Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🌿 ReZygisk (δ) 🧬

Channel

🌿 ReZygisk (δ) 🧬

@rezygisk

Not marked by Telegram, checked 22 August 2026

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

3,719subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002223093827
TypeChannel
Username@rezygisk
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rezygisk

Growth

3,7083,7193,713.521 August 2026 β€” 3,708 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 3,708 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 3,710 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 3,714 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 3,719 subscribers21 August 20262 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 12 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,706–3,721 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 16:383,719+5
30 Aug 2026, 11:083,714+4
25 Aug 2026, 00:453,710+2
21 Aug 2026, 10:353,708no change
21 Aug 2026, 08:303,708first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 March 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

703 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀31645.0%
πŸ”₯16623.6%
❀‍πŸ”₯496.97%
πŸ‘486.83%
πŸ•Š385.41%
πŸ₯°202.84%
πŸ™192.70%
😁141.99%
⚑101.42%
🐳81.14%
customΒ 519490522818858962270.996%
πŸ†30.427%
🌚20.284%
😎20.284%
πŸ˜‡10.142%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 703 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2025 to 22 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Oct 2025, 00:12 UTCβ‰ˆ13,500 views79 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @performancorg_channel

Welcome again, it has been some time since the previous RC (Release Candidate) release. However, it is worth the wait. The fourth RC has arrived. PerformanC ReZygisk Release Candidate 4 comes with many improvements to both ReZygisk performance and modules'. It also stabilizes many core systems while also enhancing furtiveness for module loading. The most notable changes in this release candidate are: - Added global…

πŸ”₯57πŸ₯°16⚑6

21 Jul 2025, 17:14 UTCviews β€”

🌿 ReZygisk (Ξ΄) 🧬 pinned «🚫 𝗦𝗧𝗒𝗣 π—§π—›π—˜ π——π—œπ—¦π—§π—₯π—œπ—•π—¨π—§π—œπ—’π—‘ 𝗒𝗙 π—™π—”π—Ÿπ—¦π—˜ π—œπ—‘π—™π—’π—₯π— π—”π—§π—œπ—’π—‘!!! ⚠️ We, once again, urge people to stop making false claims about alternative groups having the status of ReZygisk support chats. @rezygiskchat is the only official and dedicated support formation. Everything…»

21 Jul 2025, 17:14 UTCβ‰ˆ19,600 views65 reactionsread 21 August 2026

🚫 𝗦𝗧𝗒𝗣 π—§π—›π—˜ π——π—œπ—¦π—§π—₯π—œπ—•π—¨π—§π—œπ—’π—‘ 𝗒𝗙 π—™π—”π—Ÿπ—¦π—˜ π—œπ—‘π—™π—’π—₯π— π—”π—§π—œπ—’π—‘!!! ⚠️ We, once again, urge people to stop making false claims about alternative groups having the status of ReZygisk support chats. @rezygiskchat is the only official and dedicated support formation. Everything else is only associated with the ReZygisk project in the best-case scenario. We have already made such messages; we are tired of seeing people asking primitive que…

❀57πŸ‘6πŸ”₯2

1 Jul 2025, 17:08 UTCβ‰ˆ20,400 views52 reactionsread 21 August 2026

πŸ‘₯️ Why? Because we are open and not racist! It's always good to cooperate with a fellow FOSS project. 🀝 πŸ‘‘ ReZyzyayayzyza is once again ahead of everyone! We are innovative, we are honest, we are tolerant, we are bombastic, we are brave, we are just, we are ..! Uh… Playful! 🌸 πŸ’Ž We play Minecraft and many other games, so we are concerned about cheaty-cheats! 🀩 Always play fair: don't steal diamonds, don't steal code, d…

❀39🐳8πŸ”₯5

16 Jun 2025, 23:26 UTCβ‰ˆ17,000 views109 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @performancorg_channel

Exactly one year ago, consolidated as what it is known now: ReZygisk, named by one of our maintainers and (ReZygisk) WebUI designer and creator, RainyXeon. (Special thanks!) Since then, numerous, and unpredictable, events happened with this organization and us: met a previously unbelievable amount of supporters, created alliances with important names and developed a liked and well known module in the community. Now…

❀102⚑4πŸ•Š3

8 Jun 2025, 00:15 UTCβ‰ˆ11,800 views37 reactionsread 21 August 2026

πŸ“’ Just like many of us, Perdo β€” the founder and main developer of ReZygisk β€” has a personal blog-channel of his own! ℹ️ On this channel, Perdosaurus πŸ¦– will be sharing some nerdy technical stuff on internal progress of ReZygisk, so that the community might learn. Apart from that, it is quite possible he will give a slight insight into his personal life, which is full of brownies and Brazil phonk tracks. πŸ‡§πŸ‡·

❀29πŸ”₯4customΒ 51949052281885896224

18 May 2025, 20:36 UTCβ‰ˆ12,800 views42 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @performancorg_channel

https://github.com/PerformanC/ReZygisk/commit/ed347e879e562058e8e93af53619de2243009221 For almost a year, there hasn't been a way to properly assure if the build file of ReZygisk sent by some random guy was official -- or even tampered with. Later on, signed builds were distributed by ReZygisk maintainers while asking for testing, however this would only impact machikado, which could only be used to verify whether …

❀35πŸ₯°4customΒ 51949052281885896223

18 May 2025, 16:31 UTCβ‰ˆ9,360 views30 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @performancorg_channel

https://github.com/PerformanC/ReZygisk/commit/4de1b443cf98d63b2acd5b24b612a3c5ceedcd6a I am delighted to announce that, after almost a year of almost forever going work, the ReZygisk WebUI has finally arrived to main branch. This WebUI is not yet another feature of ReZygisk, but one that more than 20 people helped come to reality, not only by testing this time, but by adding pieces of code and translations. Shall …

πŸ”₯19❀10🌚1

1 May 2025, 22:21 UTCβ‰ˆ8,170 views6 reactionsread 21 August 2026

AVENGERS, ASSEMBLE! ⏱ Hey, bombs! Give this build a try! πŸš”

❀6

1 May 2025, 19:57 UTCβ‰ˆ7,960 views8 reactionsread 21 August 2026

πŸ“’ Huh! Might be something interesting for Android developers! Give it a try, and let us know. πŸ’¬

πŸ•Š7❀1

30 Apr 2025, 19:09 UTCβ‰ˆ8,150 views22 reactionsread 21 August 2026

⚠️ Beware of scammers! Remember, nobody should be paid for FOSS products: if you see someone doing this β€” do not fall for their tricks, you are being scammed! Kernels, modules, root solutions β€” all this should only be distributed as freeware. 🚫 Report & Block similar violators!

πŸ”₯22

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rezygisk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Magisk alpha
@magiskalpha Β· 65,480
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 40 here β€” alongside 39 others β€” read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸŒΏ ReZygisk (Ξ΄) πŸ§¬β€ (@rezygisk), 3,719 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rezygisk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.