Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПавливМ

Channel

ПавливМ

@pavlivm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,908subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001878443940
TypeChannel
Username@pavlivm
DescriptionРоссийский эксперт и политтехнолог Михаил Павлив. С 1997 года в политическом анализе и консалтинге. Автор неофициальной символики Новороссии и многочисленных публикаций о Новороссии, культурной и политической самобытности Юга России, русских Украины
Created7 November 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pavlivm

Growth

10,90810,93910,923.55 August 2026 — 10,939 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,939 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,925 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,911 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,914 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,928 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,919 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,912 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,920 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,915 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,908 subscribers5 August 202615 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,903–10,944 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:3510,908-7
13 Aug 2026, 15:1910,915-5
12 Aug 2026, 18:1610,920+8
11 Aug 2026, 20:1310,912-7
10 Aug 2026, 20:0710,919-9
9 Aug 2026, 23:4110,928+14
9 Aug 2026, 01:4010,914+3
7 Aug 2026, 23:4110,911-14
6 Aug 2026, 23:5410,925-14
6 Aug 2026, 02:4510,939no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:2910,939first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.3%
avg views ÷ 10,908 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,780
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held33 (23 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total256,810
Reactions total3,677
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
602
Videos
271
Links
1,480

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,418 reactions across 30 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,96857.6%
🔥67919.9%
💯58117.0%
👏1153.36%
🤯280.819%
😡240.702%
😱140.41%
😢90.263%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,677reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 01:51 UTC≈3,310 views65 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @Abbasdjuma

🇮🇷 Хороший анализ. Вывод делаю такой - Иран готовится к серьезной заварухе. Возможно, уже осенью. И Верховный лидер страны лично занимается этим вопросом.

👍45🔥17🤯3

14 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC≈4,100 views104 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Уверен - Польша и Украина придут к реинкарнации ОУН, погромам и резне. А там и до нового захвата Всходних Крес не далеко! Публикация YouTube

🔥47👍38💯14👏5

14 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC≈4,030 views131 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @condottieros

Хорошие новости из Латвии и НАТО. Американский ИИ от Палантир, на украинских БПЛА, на столько умный, что летает там где хочет. Машина в какой то момент приняв сигнал облучения от нашего РЭБ, изменила курс и начала уклонятся проложив себе курс через Латвию. Казалось бы, но вот. ИИ не выключил боевой дрон, а начал искать пути ухода от помехи. И нашел. «В воздушном пространстве Латвии, на территории Балвского края, ис

👍98🔥20👏11😱2

13 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC≈4,460 views71 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @malekdudakov

Команда Трампа продолжает разваливаться. Теперь на выход собралась Кэролайн Левитт - пресс-секретарю Белого дома все последние месяцы было очень нелегко оправдывать провалы в Иране и на других направлениях. К тому же впереди выборы, а после них аппаратчикам Трампа придётся тяжело. Демократы в случае победы обещают сходу запустить множество расследований в отношении президента США и его окружения. Министров и чиновни

👍43🔥21👏7

12 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC≈6,950 views111 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Главари Киевского режима пока еще просто не понимают какое цунами в экономике, политике и социальной сфере накроет их зимой! Публикация YouTube

💯69👍36🔥4😢2

11 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC≈4,870 views86 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @AlexandrLazarev1

Дорогие друзья, публикую новый выпуск с Евгением Копатько. Приятного просмотра! https://youtu.be/aCDF4tDf89E?si=OPppCDXQjp5eY786

🔥47👍36😡3

11 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈7,580 views117 reactionsread 15 August 2026

О чем договорились (или нет?) Вучич с Зеленским ? Хотят ли европейцы переговоров с Россией? Умеров будущий «серый кардинал» Киева? Или сразу Львова? Ответы на ваши вопросы друзья и читатели Публикация YouTube

👍105🔥11👏1

10 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈6,300 views132 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Друзья, есть возможность сегодня для вас записать экспресс-ответы на ваши вопросы. Можете их задавать в комментариях к этой публикации. Через пару часов запишу видео

👍102🔥28👏2

9 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC≈10,800 views136 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Про ближайшее будущее незалежной Про то как в действительности относятся там к Зеленскому И есть ли предел, и конец русофобии в Нэньке Публикация YouTube

👍131🔥5

9 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC≈6,810 views167 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @topinfographicPhoto

У «стратегов» США новый нежданчик. Оказалось, что высокочистый алюминий — сырьё для создания военных самолётов и бронетехники — перестали производить в США с 2022 года, то есть с момента прошлого энергетического кризиса. Главным источником сырья для стратегической отрасли стала алюминиевая отрасль ОАЭ, поставляющая до 90% потребностей местной оборонки. В марте беспилотники Тегерана повредили крупнейшие заводы в ОАЭ

👍123🔥36👏5💯3

7 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC≈6,240 views72 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @AlexandrLazarev1

Дорогие друзья публикую новый выпуск Диалогов. В гостях Василий Вакаров! Приятного просмотра! https://youtu.be/AQKe2Yb78jo?si=V2ky4EM5l3kDQOZU

👏42👍23🔥6😡1

7 Aug 2026, 00:07 UTC≈6,910 views87 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @topinfographicPhoto

Цены на медь поднялись выше уровня 14 тыс. долларов за тонну, и перекрытие Ормуза здесь ни при чём. В отличие от нефти, в моменте в мире нет острого дефицита этого металла: все текущие потребности в меди удовлетворены. Однако красный металл — база для энергетики и ИИ, и на этом фоне «пузырится», как всё связанное с ЦОДами. Впрочем, высокие цены на медь во многом оправданы. Перспективы спроса у металла прекрасны: он

👍74😱12🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @pavlivm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 208,144 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПавливМ” (@pavlivm), 10,908 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pavlivm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.