Channel
@pasokhtext
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
285subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001143515174 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pasokhtext |
| Description | کانال پاسخ متنی به شبهات : https://t.me/pasokhtext کانال دیگر ما حاوی پاسخ صوتی به شبهات: https://t.me/pasokhvoice https://t.me/pasokhvoice لطفا ما را به مومنین معرفی کنید |
| Created | Between 1 May 2017 and 30 June 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pasokhtext |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @shenakhtehadis/77110 Dec 2025, 20:33 UTC | @pasokhtext/487 · this entry10 Dec 2025, 20:33 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @pasokhtext/490 · this entry2 Jan 2026, 16:31 UTC | @shenakhtehadis/7772 Jan 2026, 16:31 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @shenakhtehadis/7793 Jan 2026, 18:54 UTC | @pasokhtext/492 · this entry3 Jan 2026, 18:55 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @shenakhtehadis/7783 Jan 2026, 18:54 UTC | @pasokhtext/491 · this entry3 Jan 2026, 18:55 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @shenakhtehadis | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @shenakhtehadis (4–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 September 2025 to 9 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @shenakhtehadis. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 285 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 285 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
✅ «خالقبودنِ ائمه» حتی با اذنِ خداوند غلط است علامه محمدباقر مجلسی(ره): «و لا تَعتقِد اَنَّهم خلقوا العالَمَ بامرِ اللهِ تعالی، فإنّا قَد نُهینا فی صِحاح الأخبار عن القول به و لا عِبرةَ بما رواه البُرسیُّ و غیرُه من الأخبار الضعیفة». 📚 رساله اعتقادات علامه مجلسی #غلو #غلات @Nardebane_feghahat
🤔مناظره عالییییی در شناختن حق👇👇👇 ✅ چفیه قرمزی بر سر و با ریش های دراز و با صدایی بلند🎤 و با آب و تاب بسیار هر شب در مسجد، ابوبکر، عمر و عثمان را بر امیرالمومنین علیهالسلام برتری میداد. جوانی برومند از گوشه مسجد برخواست و گفت... بشنوید:👇 👹 مولوی عمرو: سیدنا ابوبکر رض، عمر و عثمان برتر از سیدنا علی رضی الله عنه هستند،ابوبکر و عمر پیران بهشت هستند و عثمان مظلوم این امت! 👱 سید محمد از گوشه مسجد: جناب مولوی از مح…
آتش بس از نظر قرآن کریم: سوره انفال: آیات ۶۱ و ۶۲ : وَإِن جَنَحُوا لِلسَّلْمِ فَاجْنَحْ لَهَا وَتَوَكَّلْ عَلَى اللَّهِ ۚ إِنَّهُ هُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْعَلِيمُ ﴿٦١﴾ وَإِن يُرِيدُوا أَن يَخْدَعُوكَ فَإِنَّ حَسْبَكَ اللَّهُ ۚ هُوَ الَّذِي أَيَّدَكَ بِنَصْرِهِ وَبِالْمُؤْمِنِينَ ﴿٦٢﴾ ترجمه: و اگر [دشمنان] به صلح تمایل داشتند، [تو نیز] تمایل نشان بده و بر خداوند توکل کن. همانا او شنوا و داناست. (۶۱) و اگر بخواهند تو را…
آتش بس با دشمن از نظر امیرالمؤمنین علی علیه السلام: از امیرالمؤمنین(ع) نقل شده که در بخشنامه خود خطاب به مالک اشتر فرمودند: « ... وَ لَا تَدْفَعَنَّ صُلْحاً دَعَاكَ إِلَيْهِ عَدُوُّكَ و لِلَّهِ فِيهِ رِضًا فَإِنَّ فِي الصُّلْحِ دَعَةً لِجُنُودِكَ وَ رَاحَةً مِنْ هُمُومِكَ وَ أَمْناً لِبِلَادِكَ وَ لَكِنِ الْحَذَرَ كُلَّ الْحَذَرِ مِنْ عَدُوِّكَ بَعْدَ صُلْحِهِ فَإِنَّ الْعَدُوَّ رُبَّمَا قَارَبَ لِيَتَغَفَّلَ فَخُذ…
ما و این رسمهای خودساخته مردمی که انتظار دارند حجاب و مَهر و روزه و همۀ واجبات و حرام های الهی متناسب با شرایط روز تغییر کند و به گفتۀ خودشان روزآمد شود؛ حاضر نیستند از رسم و رسوم خودساختۀ خودشان سَرِ سوزنی کوتاه بیایند. خرید سرویس طلا و گرفتن تالار و بردن شبچلهای و دادن هدیههای گوناگون به مناسبتهای رگباری زن و پدر و پسر و دختر و معلم و تولد و ازدواج و زایمان، در این اوضاع سرخ اقتصادی چه ضرورتی دارد؟ این روزها …
بقیه پاسخ به سؤال در مورد استفاده از لقب رزاق برای امیرالمؤمنین علیه السلام نتیجه: ادب توحیدی و پیروی از شیوه گفتاری معصومین(ع) میطلبد لقب «رازق» و «رزّاق» را - حتی در اشعار و مداحی - برای معصومین(ع) به کار نبریم زیرا تشبّه به گروههای منحرف مثل غُلاة و مُفَوِّضه و تأیید ضمنی و ترویج ادبیات و عقاید آنان یا «قباحت زدایی از انحرافاتشان است اما به کار بردن فعل «رزق» به معنای «پرداخت نفقه ی افراد تحت تکفّل» مانعی ندارد…
پرسش: در جشن مربوط به امیرالمؤمنین(ع) یکی از مداحان گفت: «دست دعا به سمت رزّاق جهان امیرالمؤمنین(ع) بلند کنیم». آیا این سخن از نظر شرعی درست است؟ پاسخ: الف) رزّاق جهان و رازِق حقیقی، فقط خدای بزرگ است ولی مخلوقاتش اگر «وسیله رسیدن روزی به انسان» باشند، به صورت مجازی میتوان فعل «رَزَقَ» را برای آنها به کار بُرد. به همین خاطر فعل «اُرزقوا» در موارد نادری در قرآن برای «تأمین زندگی افراد تحت تکفّل (توسط غیر خدا)» هم …
پرسش: اخیرا یکی از سخنرانهای مذهبی به جای «إنشاءالله»(اگر خدا بخواهد) میگوید: «ان شاء الله و علي بن ابي طالب»(اگر خداوند و علی بن ابيطالب بخواهند)!! وقتی برخی از مؤمنین به او اعتراض کردند مدعی شد که روایتی در کتاب «القطره» در این مورد آمده است. آیا این کتاب، معتبر است و چنین حدیثی واقعاً در آن ذکر شده است؟ پاسخ: 1 - استفاده عبارت «إن شاءالله و علی بن ابیطالب» از آن جهت که عُرفاً به معنای «مساوی قرار دادنِ خالق و …
صهیونیستها خیرخواه مسلمانان نیستند خداوند در قرآن میفرماید: مَا يَوَدُّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنْ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ وَلَا الْمُشْرِكِينَ أَنْ يُنَزَّلَ عَلَيْكُمْ مِنْ خَيْرٍ مِنْ رَبِّكُمْ ۗ وَاللَّهُ يَخْتَصُّ بِرَحْمَتِهِ مَنْ يَشَاءُ ۚ وَاللَّهُ ذُو الْفَضْلِ الْعَظِيمِ (سوره بقره: آیه ۱۰۵) ترجمه: کسانی از اهل کتاب و مشرکان که کافر شده اند، دوست ندارند که هیچ خیری از سوی خدای شما بر شما نازل شود، اما خداوند، هرکس…
استاد ما مرحوم علامه محقق استاد جعفری حقيقتا از برجسته ترین استادان تاریخنگاری صدر اسلام در میان چند عالم دینی بود که به تاریخنگاری در 60 سال گذشته عنایت داشتند. علامه سید مرتضی عسکری هم نمونه دیگر بود. این دو محقق برجسته درک تاریخی داشتند و در شناخت منابع سیره و تاریخ صدر اسلام و تشخیص سنت های مختلف روایات تاریخی و توجه به انگیزه ها و زمینه های نقل روایت حقیقتا در طیف علمای دینی انگشت شماری که به تاریخنگاری پرداخته …
معنای نام فاطمه(س) پرسش: آیا صحت دارد که نام فاطمه یعنی «خانمی که بچه اش را از شیر گرفته است»؟ پاسخ: اینکه بگوییم «فاطمه یعنی زنی که نوزاد خود را از شیر گرفته» یک تعریف نامناسب است زیرا به جنبه مثبت موضوع توجه ندارد و بر نیمه خالی لیوان تمرکز میکند. از نظر لغوی، کلمه فاطمه یعنی مادری که نوزادش را کاملا (به مدت دو سال) شیر داده و سیراب کرده و وظیفه مادری را در حق فرزندش تمام و کمال به جا آورده و اکنون زمانی رسیده ک…
❌❌ هیچ منبع معتبری درباره #شهادت حضرت ام البنین وجود ندارد ❌❌ ❌👆همه این منابع متاخر و برای سالهای اخیر هستند و اصلا منبع دست اول قدیمی در این باره وجود ندارد ❌❌
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pasokhtext. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 915,433 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پاسخ به شبهات و پرسش ها - متن” (@pasokhtext), 285 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pasokhtext.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.