했제해도되나요??

Channel
막스밸류
@paarrrk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003711107139 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @paarrrk |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/paarrrk |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 13 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 13 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 70.9%
- avg views ÷ 13 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 9.2
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 166 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 98
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 22
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
2026.08.12 10:48:45 기업명: 실리콘투(시가총액: 2조 9,575억) A257720 보고서명: 연결재무제표기준영업(잠정)실적(공정공시) 매출액 : 4,026억(예상치 : 3,822억+/ 5%) 영업익 : 830억(예상치 : 715억/ +16%) 순이익 : 723억(예상치 : 433억+/ 67%) **최근 실적 추이** 2026.2Q 4,026억/ 830억/ 723억 2026.1Q 3,466억/ 645억/ 543억 2025.4Q 3,059억/ 424억/ 358억 2025.3Q 2,994억/ 631억/ 584억 2025.2Q 2,653억/ 522억/ 356억 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260812900140 회사정보: https://finance.naver.c…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
실리콘투 실발에 관해 급하게 여러가지 생각들을 정리해봤습니다. 먼저 ODM사들의 움직임입니다. 코스메카코리아, 코스맥스 각각 영익 16%, 6% 상회했는데 슈팅이 나왔습니다. 과거 ODM사들과 실리콘투의 per,eps,주가를 보면 어느정도 커플링을 해왔습니다. 근데 이번 ODM사들의 주가 반응을 보니 화장품의 센티가 확실히 강해졌다고 느낄 수 있었습니다. 별개로 파마리서치가 스트릿 컨센에 비해 좀 아쉬웠음에도 불구하고 당일에 바로 말아올렸으며 주봉이 바뀜에도 추세를 유지했습니다. 지금 시장이 이익잘나오고 현금흐름이 탄탄한 친구들을 인정해주는 분위기이고 특히 화장품 소비재쪽이 강하다 생각합니다. 그렇기에 충분히 실리콘투도 좋은 모습을 기대할 수 있는 시점이라는 생각이 듭니다. 특히, 이번주 ODM사들처럼 실리콘투가 실적이 컨센보다 조금…
데일리 일부 코스메카코리아, 코스맥스 각각 영익 16%, 6% 상회했는데 슈팅나옴. 이를 통해서 화장품의 센티가 확실해진 것을 느낄 수 있음. 추가로 파마리서치가 스트릿 컨센에 비해 좀 아쉬웠음에도 당일에 바로 회복하고 주봉이 바뀜에도 추세를 유지했음. 실투가 이정도가 될수 있으려나..를 생각해보자 지금 시장이 이익잘나오고 현금흐름 짱짱한 친구들을 인정해주는 분위기라면 얘네도 충분히 그러한 애가 될 수 있다고 생각함.
Channel name was changed to «막스밸류»
진짜 기가막힌 휩쏘...
Channel name was changed to «맥스밸류»
노돌) 내일 실리콘투 실적 800억 예상
근데 이번 빅테크 실적들 보면서 느낀건...AI 프론티어 모델도 중요하지만, 클라우드 사업이 2017년때 크게 열린것처럼 그런 퀀텀점프가 한번 더 발생하고 있지 있나 생각이 들었음 너도나도 AI쓰기 시작하고, AI가 데이터를 낳고 있으면서 그 수많은 데이터를 정제, 저장될 곳이 너무나도 부족해보임 나만 해도 회사에서 하루종일 딸깍딸깍하면서 PDF파일/이미지/엑셀 몇십개씩 만들고 있는데, 이거 용량이 기하급수적으로 늘어날듯
아직 초보니까.. 장에 대한 감각을 기록하는 용으로...(했제이런거아니고)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @paarrrk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,129,918 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“막스밸류” (@paarrrk), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paarrrk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.