Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 막스밸류

Channel

막스밸류

@paarrrk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003711107139
TypeChannel
Username@paarrrk
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/paarrrk

Growth

1311 Aug 2026, 13:17 — 13 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 02:46 — 13 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 13:1712 Aug 2026, 02:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:4613no change
11 Aug 2026, 13:1713first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
70.9%
avg views ÷ 13 subscribers
Avg views / post
9.2
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total166
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
98
Videos
2
Links
22

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 01:50 UTC5 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @darthacking

2026.08.12 10:48:45 기업명: 실리콘투(시가총액: 2조 9,575억) A257720 보고서명: 연결재무제표기준영업(잠정)실적(공정공시) 매출액 : 4,026억(예상치 : 3,822억+/ 5%) 영업익 : 830억(예상치 : 715억/ +16%) 순이익 : 723억(예상치 : 433억+/ 67%) **최근 실적 추이** 2026.2Q 4,026억/ 830억/ 723억 2026.1Q 3,466억/ 645억/ 543억 2025.4Q 3,059억/ 424억/ 358억 2025.3Q 2,994억/ 631억/ 584억 2025.2Q 2,653억/ 522억/ 356억 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260812900140 회사정보: https://finance.naver.c

11 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC7 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

실리콘투 실발에 관해 급하게 여러가지 생각들을 정리해봤습니다. 먼저 ODM사들의 움직임입니다. 코스메카코리아, 코스맥스 각각 영익 16%, 6% 상회했는데 슈팅이 나왔습니다. 과거 ODM사들과 실리콘투의 per,eps,주가를 보면 어느정도 커플링을 해왔습니다. 근데 이번 ODM사들의 주가 반응을 보니 화장품의 센티가 확실히 강해졌다고 느낄 수 있었습니다. 별개로 파마리서치가 스트릿 컨센에 비해 좀 아쉬웠음에도 불구하고 당일에 바로 말아올렸으며 주봉이 바뀜에도 추세를 유지했습니다. 지금 시장이 이익잘나오고 현금흐름이 탄탄한 친구들을 인정해주는 분위기이고 특히 화장품 소비재쪽이 강하다 생각합니다. 그렇기에 충분히 실리콘투도 좋은 모습을 기대할 수 있는 시점이라는 생각이 듭니다. 특히, 이번주 ODM사들처럼 실리콘투가 실적이 컨센보다 조금

11 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC8 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

데일리 일부 코스메카코리아, 코스맥스 각각 영익 16%, 6% 상회했는데 슈팅나옴. 이를 통해서 화장품의 센티가 확실해진 것을 느낄 수 있음. 추가로 파마리서치가 스트릿 컨센에 비해 좀 아쉬웠음에도 당일에 바로 회복하고 주봉이 바뀜에도 추세를 유지했음. 실투가 이정도가 될수 있으려나..를 생각해보자 지금 시장이 이익잘나오고 현금흐름 짱짱한 친구들을 인정해주는 분위기라면 얘네도 충분히 그러한 애가 될 수 있다고 생각함.

11 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC7 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @haetwo

근데 이번 빅테크 실적들 보면서 느낀건...AI 프론티어 모델도 중요하지만, 클라우드 사업이 2017년때 크게 열린것처럼 그런 퀀텀점프가 한번 더 발생하고 있지 있나 생각이 들었음 너도나도 AI쓰기 시작하고, AI가 데이터를 낳고 있으면서 그 수많은 데이터를 정제, 저장될 곳이 너무나도 부족해보임 나만 해도 회사에서 하루종일 딸깍딸깍하면서 PDF파일/이미지/엑셀 몇십개씩 만들고 있는데, 이거 용량이 기하급수적으로 늘어날듯

10 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026

아직 초보니까.. 장에 대한 감각을 기록하는 용으로...(했제이런거아니고)

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @paarrrk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,129,918 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“막스밸류” (@paarrrk), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paarrrk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.