Channel
@ozveryata
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
443subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001732348344 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ozveryata |
| Description | Природа Новгородской области и других мест, где был автор, в картинках. А также полезные и питательные рассказы о живой жизни. Для юных натуралистов от 7 до 77 лет. По всем вопросам обращаться в дупло: @e4ausova |
| Created | 18 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ozveryata |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 443 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 443 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,395 |
| Reactions total | 577 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
577 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5314741073514346217 | 200 | 34.7% | |
| 😁 | 157 | 27.2% | |
| 🔥 | 50 | 8.67% | |
| custom 5323368958437369835 | 47 | 8.15% | |
| ❤🔥 | 46 | 7.97% | |
| ❤ | 38 | 6.59% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 2.77% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 1.04% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 0.693% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 0.693% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 0.52% | |
| custom 5307900977318212503 | 2 | 0.347% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.347% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.347% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 577reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Плоды трудов моих педагогических… Вороночка Мунин жрет мыша. Он проделал нелегкий путь он «ааааа что это за пакость» до вытаскивания мышов из обеда первым делом, как самого вкусного. Похвалите его. (Ну и меня заодно можно). #варона
custom 532336895843736983520❤12🐳1👏1
Категорически антигастрономический псто. Брезгливым не читать. Я пердупердила. Птицы жрут сверчков. Они такие коричневые с бежевым по цвету. Я жру ириски соленая карамель из Лавки, они понятно какого цвета. Я, найдя у себя на руке налипшую бежевую крошку: интересно, это ириска или сверчок?.. Попробовала. Ириска. #виселицца
😁32❤7
Коммуникацые… #варона
custom 532336895843736983516🥰4👏3
Вороночка, которого уже мы все тихо бесим из-за лечения, внезапно изобразил мне воркование, которое вообще-то "только для своих", в отличие от громких карков. А когда я с ним закоммуницировала в ответ — попытался звукоподражать слова "Мунин" и "ворона". Это шо блин за внезапный прилив нежности и социальности был?.. Недоумеваю... #варона
❤🔥44🥰6😁6custom 53233689584373698355
«Яков Менелаевич вспомнил: эти чистые глаза, этот уверенный взгляд он видел в Таганской тюрьме в 1922 году». #стрижопа
custom 531474107351434621738😁12
Знач, попыталась я потрафить охотничьим инстинктам вороны Мунина… Взяла кормового таракана, отхреначила ему голову и положила вороне в миску. А он без головы убежать уже не может, но лапками дергает. Вот, думаю, эмуляция охоты… А Мунин посмотрел, как таракан дергает ногами - и решил, что эта тварь очень страшная. Поэтому начал покрадать у нее из-под носа остальную еду, осторожно подкрадываясь и быстро отпрыгивая, ч…
😁26custom 53233689584373698356🥰1
Этот пранк зашел слишком далеко, но остановиться невозможно... #стрижопа
😁42👍4❤🔥2
Я должна этим поделиться 🤣🤣🤣 @emonition гений 🔥 #стрижопа
🔥32😁10❤2💯2custom 53147410735143462171
Не верьте этим беззащитным глазам, он ровно в этот момент вцепляется в меня когтями, пытаясь заползти в полотенце на полметра вглупь. #стрижопа
😁19🥰5custom 53147410735143462174🐳1
Стриж Тишенька тренируется, чтобы подниматься вверх, но вместо этого уходит вглубь. Но потом замечательно выходит. #стрижопа
custom 531474107351434621722😁1
Для тех, кто волнуется: дристание стремительно остановлено мезимом, все хорошо. #стрижопа
custom 531474107351434621720❤4😁3
Если вам пишут "стрижа можно кормить только вот этим и только вот так, а всем остальным кормить нельзя ни в коем случае" - верьте этому безоговорочно. И вот почему... Стриж: здоров, упитанный и набирает вес, какает практически идеально, ест очень неплохо. Я: ему нужен более разнообразный корм для сбалансированного питания, добавлю-ка к сверчкам тараканов... Я: добавляю милипусечную порцию в два таракана на кормление…
custom 531474107351434621731😁6
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ozveryata. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 631,893 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Озверята им. Бианки” (@ozveryata), 443 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ozveryata.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.