Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мемуары Отто ⁺.⊹

Channel

Мемуары Отто ⁺.⊹

@ottohayama

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

282subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002884650117
TypeChannel
Username@ottohayama
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 September 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ottohayama

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2822862847 August 2026 — 286 subscribers20 August 2026 — 284 subscribers5 September 2026 — 285 subscribers8 September 2026 — 285 subscribers13 September 2026 — 282 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 37 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 281–287 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 00:37282-3
8 Sept 2026, 07:22285no change
5 Sept 2026, 05:41285+1
20 Aug 2026, 13:16284-2
7 Aug 2026, 03:46286first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.5%
avg views ÷ 282 subscribers
Avg views / post
165
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held8 (8 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total165
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

430 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20547.7%
🍓6815.8%
custom 52445101247724560404610.7%
💘378.60%
custom 5242478111320213806368.37%
custom 5242259806722490967194.42%
❤‍🔥71.63%
💔71.63%
😢40.93%
🦄10.233%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 430 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC165 views25 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

https://youtu.be/XTx6-BUm3fE?si=eAkuARBibh4oPFVR

10custom 524247811132021380610custom 52422598067224909674🦄1

21 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC320 views23 reactionsread 8 September 2026

я безумно сильно угорела по той части ру репа, где артисты срутся друг с другом и меряются письками в лучшие года интернета. из разряда настолько плохо что охуенно. даже не знаю, деградация это или признак всесторонне развитого вкуса https://music.yandex.ru/playlists/52230dd2-38ba-ab97-b914-5eaa9278af1b?ref_id=852F8CC6-C150-4BC9-A737-C02326462D76&utm_medium=copy_link

21🍓1💘1

20 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC294 views58 reactionsread 8 September 2026

охаешеньки датебаешеньки всем, кто меня потерял автор пережил острый психоз в тревожно-депрессивной фазе, после нее скакнул в смешанную, наконец подобрал правильное лечение с врачом и даже не рипнулся, АЛЛИЛУЯ 😭🙏 с дуркой не сложилось, потому что на нее тупо не хватило денег, лол, а в гос учереждение я даже под страхом наложить себе в руки или за новым опытом не лягу, слишком много треша там происходит, да и на уче

29custom 524247811132021380613custom 52422598067224909679💔5🍓2

15 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC471 views46 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Video

вы только посмотрите, какую невероятную красоту сделала замечательная Nani !!!

32❤‍🔥7💘3custom 52445101247724560403🍓1

14 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC400 views50 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @teumitayPhoto

恋の予感 [koi no yokan] (яп. «предчувствие любви») — ближе к любви со второго взгляда. когда ты встречаешь кого-то особенного и чувствуешь, что влюбишься в него. возможно не сразу, но это неизбежно. посвящается отто, с днём рождения 🌸

🍓30💘137

13 Jul 2026, 23:08 UTC871 views90 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

тем временем, сам автор тоже празднует свой день рождения. сегодня мне стукнуло 24 годика, хотя ментально все ещё 16 милая, приятная традиция у художников, о которой я всегда грезила, но для которой у меня никогда раньше не было аудитории лучший подарок для автора - конечно же репост его работ

55🍓17💘11custom 52424781113202138064custom 52445101247724560403

13 Jul 2026, 23:08 UTC401 views74 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

наступило 14 июля, а значит сегодня годовщина саммер тайма для меня это очень большая и важная работа, которая подарила мне всех вас, небывалое количество любви, поддержки, заботы, новых встреч и впечатлений. никогда не думала, что мое творчество может разрастись до таких масштабов, объединить вместе столько людей и откликнуться в чужих сердцах. крепко обнимаю и целую каждого, кто заглянул однажды на фикбук и дал шан

50🍓16💘8

8 Jul 2026, 19:38 UTC448 views64 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

прошу прощения у всех, кто ждет проду контента в ближайшее время не будет, автор ложится в дурку (к сожалению не рофл…)

custom 524451012477245604040custom 52424781113202138069custom 52422598067224909676😢4💔21🍓1💘1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ottohayama. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мемуары Отто ⁺.⊹” (@ottohayama), 282 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ottohayama.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.