Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ГОРИТ И ПАХНЕТ

Channel

ГОРИТ И ПАХНЕТ

@andflame

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,936subscribers

+70 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001658182162
TypeChannel
Username@andflame
DescriptionБаяны. Вопросы, жалобы, предложения: @andflamebot Сказать спасибо: Сбер 2202 2050 9733 4376
Created12 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/andflame

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,8668,9428,9046 August 2026 — 8,866 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,868 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,872 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,870 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,878 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,876 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,886 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,893 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,895 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,901 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,906 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,920 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,923 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,924 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,942 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,940 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,938 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,934 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,933 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,932 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,929 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,933 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,941 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,935 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,936 subscribers8,9366 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 93 days, net +70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,855–8,953 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 14:168,936+1
4 Nov 2026, 08:368,935-6
29 Oct 2026, 10:318,941+8
26 Oct 2026, 18:308,933+4
23 Oct 2026, 13:278,929-3
20 Oct 2026, 22:188,932-1
17 Oct 2026, 22:348,933-1
14 Oct 2026, 21:408,934-4
11 Oct 2026, 22:378,938-2
5 Oct 2026, 15:568,940-2
27 Sept 2026, 21:198,942+18
18 Sept 2026, 16:368,924+1
14 Sept 2026, 11:588,923+3
10 Sept 2026, 15:598,920+14
5 Sept 2026, 02:388,906+5
1 Sept 2026, 14:548,901+6
29 Aug 2026, 12:378,895+2
26 Aug 2026, 05:258,893+7
22 Aug 2026, 20:148,886+10
19 Aug 2026, 00:458,876first reading

Engagement

344 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 8,936 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,560
100 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
100
of 344 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held344 (4 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total156,289
Reactions total4,556
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 23:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈27,500
Videos
≈3,090
Links
≈655

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 05s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,808 reactions across 328 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11,45689.4%
💩1,35210.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 344 of the 344 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,388 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 344 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
0.291%
1 of 344 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
939
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,450
over 343 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGH3cwj122 August 202622 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 344 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 100 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 11:20 UTC≈1,130 views42 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥42

10 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,190 views53 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥53

10 Nov 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,160 views47 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥36💩11

10 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,140 views59 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥58💩1

10 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,140 views34 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥34

10 Nov 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,300 views34 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥34

10 Nov 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,310 views49 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥49

10 Nov 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,440 views52 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥52

9 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,510 views35 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥35

9 Nov 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,580 views51 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥44💩7

Showing the 12 most recent of 344 posts we hold for @andflame. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

ВИДЕОМЭМЫ
@videomemes333 · 6,340
9 posts
Коробка с котами
@korobkaskotami333 · 7,489
4 posts
Долбильня 24/7
@MemDoze · 12,287
2 posts
Ящик Пандоры
@Pandora62 · 2,437
2 posts
портал мемов
@meme_port · 1,784
2 posts
Мемологическая Дева
@memo_deva · 4,921
2 posts
Мемные мародёры
@mmaroders · 6,513
2 posts
ОтсосискА
@otsosiska · 24,172
2 posts
Человек собаке друг
@sobachkazz · 1,773
2 posts
Голландский штурвал ⚓️
@Dutchhelmeme · 5,363
1 post
🎙Галстукова On Air🔉
@Galstukovaonline · 10,045
1 post
местные
@Podmoskold · 3,258
1 post
СЛАВА БОГУ У НАС ЕСТЬ МЕМЫ
@SBUNEM · 25,810
1 post
Абубинск
@abubinsk · 1,913
1 post
Addicted to Pi
@addicted_to_Pi · 3,445
1 post
Ириш, алё
@aleirisha · 3,179
1 post
Анальный ответ
@analanswer · 7,992
1 post
Дверной проем
@bezdonnyy · 2,365
1 post
cats, i love cats
@catsilcats · 5,218
1 post
Улыбок тебе дед Макар
@doingwithgrandpa · 4,331
1 post
HornyFunny
@hornyfanny · 6,065
1 post
Howtowashacat
@howtowashacat · 14,585
1 post
Славянский зоопарк
@jabckomemes · 8,744
1 post
как в том меме помнишь
@kak_v_meme · 4,152
1 post
Мамкина булка
@mamkinabulk · 4,578
1 post
ОТЕЦ МЕМÈСНЫЙ
@memesnyi · 3,339
1 post
Zhemafu
@memidlyanaroda · 1,870
1 post
mem moment
@memmomentss · 28,217
1 post
Daria Dontsova Club
@teleDDC · 3,279
1 post
Трое в даме не считая собаки
@thresomewhitout · 12,955
1 post
🍆 Southern Western Gothic Union (ЮЗГС)
@who_fuckin_knows · 4,669
1 post
🐸Пролетая над гнездом лягушки🐸21+🇷🇺
@zhabztvo · 7,562
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Три мема внутривенно
@trimema · 18,866
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 October 2026
Склад годноты
@GodnoSklad · 22,792
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 19 September 2026
Святой отец
@svyatoy_otec_memes · 35,207
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
Приколюшечки - позитив каждый день
@greenhoody · 27,756
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026
ЦП🐴
@tsi_po · 21,125
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ГОРИТ И ПАХНЕТ” (@andflame), 8,936 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andflame.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.