Channel
@osamaHashemR
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
455subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002111776415 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @osamaHashemR |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/osamaHashemR |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 455 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 457 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 June 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,231 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 71.4% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 28.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
يواجه الإنسان في حياته الكلام المسيء والأذى، وتكمن الحكمة في التعامل مع ذلك بالتغاضي والمرور عليه دون الوقوف عنده؛ لأن كثرة التفكير في الإساءة تُثقل القلب وتجعل الفرد سريع الغضب والانفعال. ويتحقق هذا التسامي عندما نفهم طبيعة البشر وما فيهم من ضعف وقصور، مما يجعل الصبر على أذاهم تدريباً يُقوّي النفس ويجعلها أقدر على مواجهة الشدائد وفي النهاية، يجد المرء راحته وعزاءه في العدل الإلهي؛ حيث يتحول هذا الأذى الباطل إلى خير…
❤1
غريزة إدراك الغاية ينطلق الوجود الإنساني في تفاصيله اليومية من أنشطة اعتيادية تحركها مبررات مباشرة وغايات جزئية، غير أن هذا الاستقرار الظاهري سرعان ما يتبدد عند العثور على طارئ يُربك التوقع، أو حين يداهم المرءَ الشعورُ بالملل؛ إذ يتجاوز العقل حينها حدود الفائدة العاجلة ليسأل عن الفائدة الكلية وراء هذا السعي برمته. إن هذا النزوع نحو البحث عن "المعنى الكلي" ليس ترفاً ذهنياً، بل هو استجابة لشرط إنساني أصيل يتطلع دائماً…
Sticker, posted without a caption
تزوّج ممّن يشبهك في العادات والطباع؛ فالقيم التي تراها أنت أصلًا ثابتًا، قد يراها غيرك تشددًا والتحرر الذي يحسبه البعض تحضرًا، قد يراه آخرون انحلالاً، وحتى المروءة التي تعدّها فضيلة، قد ينظر إليها غيرك كضعف! تشابهُ المفاهيم هو أساس الاستقرار.. فتزوج من يشبهك، إن أردت راحة بالك. وصدق من قال : وتأنَسُ النّفسُ في نفْسٍ تُوافِقُها بالفكرِ والطّبعِ والغاياتِ .. والقيمِ
👍2
Sticker, posted without a caption
عبدالله رشدي وأضرابه أضرّ على القضيّة من أدوات الصهاينة الإعلاميّة أحيانًا.. المروّجون لهذه الأقيسة السخيفة، المنهمكون في خلط الملهيات بالمهِمّات، تجاوزوا إلى إلحاق الأذى بأهل غزّة بمسالك التثبيط، وصرف الأمّة عن القواطع والواجبات الكفائية إلى مضايق الملهيات والترّهات، إذ يوهمون النّاس بأنّ نصر القضايا الكبرى يُنال بلا كلفة ولا جهاد ولا تدبير. فتعليق النصر بغير مظانّه الحقيقيّة من إعداد القوة وتدبير السياسة وبذل الوس…
إياك أن تجعل علاقتك بالله قائمة على مبدأ "المقايضة" وانتظار مقابل عاجل لكل عبادة؛ فمن يعبد الله بناءً على شرط الإجابة، يهتز إيمانه عند أول ابتلاء. العبودية الحقيقية هي تسليم مطلق في السراء والضراء، وعلينا دائماً مراجعة أنفسنا وتطهيرها من هذا التفكير؛ لئلا تزلّ القدم فنخسر الدنيا والآخرة، وذلك هو الخسران المبين. غفر الله لنا وهدانا.
Sticker, posted without a caption
عن عطاء الخراساني رحمه الله قال: ما من عبد يسجد لله سجدة في بقعة من بقاع الأرض، إلا شهدت له يوم القيامة، وبكت عليه يوم يموت.
❤1
معركة الوعي في زمن القوة الناعمة. لو تأملنا في شكل الصراعات المعاصرة، سنجد أن الحروب لم تعد تُحسم بالطائرات والدبابات كما كانت في السابق، بل أصبحت تُدار بقوة أخرى أشد عمقاً وأطول أثراً، وهي ما نسميها "القوة الناعمة" هذه القوة باختصار هي القدرة على جعل الآخرين يريدون ما تريده أنت، ليس بالإجبار أو لغة السلاح، بل بالإقناع والجاذبية الثقافية وبناء الصورة الذهنية ولعل هذا ما أدركه صناع القرار في الولايات المتحدة بعد أحدا…
❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
-النقاشات التراثية بولغ فيها ومزقت الصفوف! -فماذا ترى أنت؟ -كل الثورة العلمية من صنع الشياطين ومن خالفني في هذا من المسلمين أدعوه للشِّجار الجديد! سيرة ثقافة معاصرة
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @osamaHashemR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 785,731 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة | أسامة بن محمد هاشم 📖” (@osamaHashemR), 455 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osamaHashemR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.