Channel
@oproverzhenie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
343subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002121277130 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oproverzhenie |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oproverzhenie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 343 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 340 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:59 | 340 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
315 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 167 | 53.0% | |
| 👍 | 52 | 16.5% | |
| 😭 | 38 | 12.1% | |
| custom 5778223436945954171 | 27 | 8.57% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 5.08% | |
| 👎 | 15 | 4.76% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 315reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2024 to 13 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oproverzhenie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 October 2024 to 13 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Аннулирование мазхаба ашаритов Ашариты говорят, что довод, который отводит текст от их внешнего смысла - довод разума, а не другой шариатский текст (И даже, если бы он был - то тут выступят другие слова ашарита ар-Рази, аль-Амиди и аль-Иджи, о некатегоричности аятов Корана, хадисов и того, на что они указывают). И раз это довод разума, а не довод шариата, следовательно его не было ни в речи Аллаха, ни в речи Его пос…
👍11🤣8custom 57782234369459541715❤2
Админ потерял доступ к этому каналу Остался лишь я, резервный модератор Брат попросил передать что его новый канал здесь: https://t.me/arradalya Вступайте туда ! Там уже добавляются новые посты
😭11🤣5custom 57782234369459541715❤4👍1
✅ Тагут ас-Суюты: поклоняйтесь мне после смерти 📚 Сказал Абдуль Кадир аш-Шазили (ум. 946 г.х.), ближайший ученик и соратник ашаритского ученого ас-Суюты, описывая события после смерти ас-Суюты: "И он сказал членам своей семьи: когда у вас будет нужда, приходите к моей могиле, и упоминайте ее мне, и она будет удовлетворена. И просили у него свои важные нужды группа его учеников после его смерти, и они удовлетворялис…
custom 57782234369459541717❤3
File, posted without a caption
Сказал ибн аль-Мибрад аль-Ханбали: «(После упоминания слов саляфов о порицании каляма), ибн 'Асакир сказал: «Они имели ввиду - а Аллах знает лучше - калям нововведенцев, ведь в их времена был известен лишь калям нововведенцев, а ахлю-Сунна почти не входили в него, но когда были вынуждены войти, то это стал уже совсем другой калям». И сказал Ибн 'Асакир: «И эту сторону ответа упомянул аль Байхаки». Посмотри на этот н…
👍5
Следующий эфир: «Какой-то пролактиновый и низко-тестостеронный мальчик вздумал бросить мне вызов. Сегодня в эфире обсудим его ошибки»
🤣23😭5👎2custom 57782234369459541712
Все мы знаем хадис рабыни и все мы знаем о вопросе, посредством ответа на который она была охарактеризована как верующая. Итак, по мнению этих людей, Пророк - мир ему - был некомпетентен в самом важном вопросе религии, без верного ответа на который тщетны все деяния по единогласию имамов сунны. Хотя и сами ашариты при любом удобном моменте вбрасывают псевдоаргумент: «Где был Аллах до создания творений?», унаследованн…
👍11❤2custom 57782234369459541712
для начала начну с одной
🤣23👎4😭4custom 57782234369459541713👍1
Когда нибудь я обгоню Джаузи по количеству жен
🤣31👎9😭3custom 57782234369459541713
Уа алейкуму ссалям уа рахматуллахи уа баракятух Во-первых, стоит упомянуть суть вопроса- а это когда человек делает исключение в вере, говоря : " Я верующий ин ш'а Аллах" В "Аш-Шариа" Аль-Аджурри упоминает, что при Абдуллахе ибну Мас'уде однажды сказал один человек: " Я верующий (му'мин). Тогда ибну Мас'уд у него спросил: " Ты разве из обитателей Рая?" Мужчина ответил: " Я надеюсь на это", тогда ибну Мас'уд, да буд…
❤4
Ловите порцию ашаритского «рационализма». Оказывается, в хадисе о сотворении Адама по образу Милостивого, подразумевается сотворение человека по образу Адама #мемы
🤣20
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @oproverzhenie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الرد على المبتدعين” (@oproverzhenie), 343 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oproverzhenie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.