Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Открытое образовательное пространство | ООП

Channel

Открытое образовательное пространство | ООП

@openeduspace

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,455subscribers

-375 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001729153903
TypeChannel
Username@openeduspace
DescriptionСреда для саморазвития, доступная каждому. Мы проводим бесплатные вебинары с экспертами из разных областей знаний на самые актуальные темы для личного и профессионального роста. Проект Правительства Москвы.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/openeduspace

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,45510,83010,642.57 August 202614 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 99 days, net -375. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,399–10,886 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 07:4510,455-4
11 Nov 2026, 09:1610,459-3
9 Nov 2026, 14:5810,462-5
8 Nov 2026, 08:1910,467-1
7 Nov 2026, 01:5510,468-2
6 Nov 2026, 02:0910,470+2
5 Nov 2026, 01:4010,468-3
4 Nov 2026, 04:1510,471+2
3 Nov 2026, 00:2510,469+2
1 Nov 2026, 23:4910,467-10
31 Oct 2026, 23:2810,477-4
30 Oct 2026, 21:3910,481-3
29 Oct 2026, 19:0810,484-2
28 Oct 2026, 18:0910,486+2
27 Oct 2026, 18:3910,484+2
26 Oct 2026, 20:2610,482+1
25 Oct 2026, 20:5710,481-7
24 Oct 2026, 19:1710,488+1
23 Oct 2026, 17:4010,487+2
22 Oct 2026, 17:0010,485first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.34%
avg views ÷ 10,455 subscribers
Avg views / post
663
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held53 (10 June 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total3,316
Reactions total70
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 23:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
532
Videos
158
Links
777

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
12m 04s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

458 reactions across 45 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11725.5%
🔥11725.5%
👍5712.4%
👏347.42%
⚡275.90%
🤩173.71%
custom 5276062023975720487163.49%
💯143.06%
🎉102.18%
🥰102.18%
🏆91.97%
😁81.75%
👀61.31%
❤‍🔥40.873%
👨‍💻40.873%
😍40.873%
👻20.437%
🤔20.437%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 458 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (60.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 14:36 UTC381 views8 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🔎Как привлечь в организацию «своих» людей? У каждой организации есть своя уникальная среда и ценности. Чтобы притягивать подходящих специалистов и сразу отсеивать тех, кому такой формат не близок, важно выстроить сильный бренд работодателя. 📅 17 ноября в 10:30 проведем вебинар на тему «Как построить бренд работодателя, который привлекает „своих“ и отсекает „лишних“». 🎙️Спикер — Иоланта Саркисян, эксперт в области…

👍4❤2🔥1🤩1

9 Nov 2026, 11:13 UTC368 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

🔸Несколько инсайтов от Виктора Бурмистрова Ссылки на полное интервью: VK Видео / RUTUBE / Одноклассники / Дзен Особенно будет полезно тем, кто сейчас находится в поиске себя😌 ➡️Больше полезной информации на канале ООП @openeduspace. #ООП_фрагмент #психология #кризис #ВикторБурмистров

🔥4👏3👍2⚡1🏆1🤩1

6 Nov 2026, 10:47 UTC741 views13 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

Что посмотреть? Скриньте экран, чтобы узнать свой вебинар на эти выходные😏 #ООП #интервью #вебинар

❤4custom 52760620239757204874😁3🔥1🥰1

31 Oct 2026, 15:39 UTC862 views27 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

🏫Кто управляет городом? 31 октября во всем мире отмечается Всемирный день городов. 🎥Наша команда подготовила короткометражный документальный фильм о тех, кто остается за кулисами города Москвы. О людях, чья работа редко попадает в объективы камер, но именно благодаря ей город живёт, развивается и становится удобнее для каждого из нас. Получилось атмосферно, ярко и познавательно! Вам точно понравится ❤️ #ООП_разн…

🔥8❤7🤩4👏2😍2⚡1❤‍🔥1👀1

28 Oct 2026, 15:33 UTC964 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

✔️✔️ Встречаемся 30 октября в 10:30 Любые организационные перемены проходят гораздо легче, если команда искренне вовлечена в процесс. Задача кадровой службы — создавать комфортные условия для диалога и помогать руководству вовремя замечать актуальные запросы сотрудников. Но как выстроить этот диалог? Где проходит грань между вовлеченностью сотрудников и их ответственностью? И когда для изменений нужен внешний эксп…

❤3👍2⚡1👀1👻1🔥1custom 52760620239757204871

15 Oct 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,360 views16 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚡️Напоминание: завтра в 10:30 новый вебинар Ссылки на трансляцию: ВКонтакте | Рутуб | Одноклассники | Дзен #ООП_анонс #прямойэфир

🔥6❤5⚡4❤‍🔥1

14 Oct 2026, 15:31 UTC994 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🫠 Опять перемены, а мы ещё к прошлым привыкнуть не успели Новые задачи, реорганизации, очередная смена ролей... В какой-то момент можно устать не столько от работы, сколько от необходимости постоянно перестраиваться. 16 октября в 10:30 в прямом эфире обсудим, что делать, когда всё меняется слишком быстро. 🎙️Виктор Бурмистров — психолог, бизнес-консультант и коуч для руководителей. Темы вебинара: — как отличить ус…

⚡4❤4👍2👨‍💻1

12 Oct 2026, 09:07 UTC627 views16 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Вот и наступила середина осени🍁 По традиции делимся атмосферными снимками от нашей команды. А какая осень у вас? Делитесь своими фотографиями в комментариях❤️ #ООП_подборка #осень

🔥8❤4🤩3😍1

5 Oct 2026, 17:15 UTC≈1,360 views20 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

📌Уроки русского языка для взрослых Чтобы прокачать грамотность речи, рекомендуем посмотреть две части интервью с профессиональным филологом Анной Валл. 🎬 «Как говорить грамотно: речевые ошибки, которые убивают вашу репутацию» Часть 1️⃣ ВКонтакте | Рутуб | Одноклассники | Дзен Часть 2️⃣ ВКонтакте | Рутуб | Одноклассники | Дзен Анна рассказала о распространённых речевых ошибках и дала советы, как сделать свою речь …

🔥8❤7👍4👏1

5 Oct 2026, 12:38 UTC890 views37 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Сколько правильных ответов у вас получилось? Ставьте реакцию: 🏆 — 6 👏 — 5 ❤️ — 3-4 👀 — 1-2 #ООП_опрос #русскийязык #грамотность #речь

👏18❤9🏆8👀1👍1

5 Oct 2026, 11:37 UTC995 viewsread 9 November 2026
Poll

Какой вариант написан верно?

  1. Их было пятеро человек15%
  2. Их было пять человек66%
  3. Ни один вариант19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Oct 2026, 11:36 UTC910 viewsread 9 November 2026
Poll

В каком слове ударение соответствует литературной норме?

  1. обеспЕчение62%
  2. обеспечЕние38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @openeduspace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@openeduspace edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @openeduspace as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
23 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
7 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Oct 2026, 11:37 UTCAnonymous Quiz116 voters

Какой вариант написан верно?

  1. Их было пятеро человек15%
  2. Их было пять человек66%
  3. Ни один вариант19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Oct 2026, 11:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz117 voters

В каком слове ударение соответствует литературной норме?

  1. обеспЕчение62%
  2. обеспечЕние38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Oct 2026, 11:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz117 voters

Какой вариант написан верно?

  1. Я сделал то же упражнение, что и вчера49%
  2. Я хочу то же самое4%
  3. Оба варианта47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Oct 2026, 11:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz124 voters

Какой вариант написан верно?

  1. Нерешенная задача76%
  2. Нерешеная задача13%
  3. Ни один вариант11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Oct 2026, 11:28 UTCAnonymous Quiz125 voters

Какой вариант написан верно?

  1. Вследствие дождя матч отменили53%
  2. В следствии дождя матч отменили26%
  3. В следствие дождя матч отменили21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Oct 2026, 11:28 UTCAnonymous Quiz126 voters

Какой вариант написан верно?

  1. Нужно чаще встречатся5%
  2. Нужно чаще встречаться92%
  3. Оба варианта3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Открытое образовательное пространство | ООП” (@openeduspace), 10,455 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/openeduspace.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.