Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Университет Мышления

@tsuker_thinking

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,425subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001721616066
TypeChannel
Username@tsuker_thinking
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tsuker_thinking

Growth

2,4252,4282,426.57 August 2026 — 2,428 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,428 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,426 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,425 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,425–2,428 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:242,425-1
10 Aug 2026, 19:582,426-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:142,428no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:182,428first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 2,425 subscribers
Avg views / post
350
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held14 (2 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,849
Reactions total108
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 28s
Average length
1m 28s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

151 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5637.1%
5133.8%
👍3221.2%
👏74.64%
💯10.662%
😁10.662%
😍10.662%
🙏10.662%
🤣10.662%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
7.14%
1 of 14 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
124
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
388
over 12 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwdrwjZ17 August 20267 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC124 viewsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqwdrwjZVideo

Можно ли смотреть на бизнес не только через эффективность, но и через мастерство? Можно ли говорить о компаниях как об авторах собственного стиля? О командах – как о соавторах большого замысла? А о развитии людей – как о творческом процессе? Именно вокруг этих вопросов в этом году строится фестиваль «ПиР. Практики Развития», фестиваль с собственной идеей и философией. Почему организаторы выбрали тему «Бизнес как и

5 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC211 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему одни команды проходят через кризисы сильнее, а другие начинают разрушаться? Второй раз Аркадий Цукер стал гостем подкаста Сергея Журихина, проректора Университета Правительства Москвы. После первой встречи стало понятно, что вопросов об управлении в эпоху перемен слишком много, чтобы уложить их в один разговор. Второй подкаст начался с темы антихрупкости, а в итоге вышел далеко за ее пределы :)) В первом вып

3🔥2😍1

4 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC296 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня экосистема знаний об ИИ богата практическими решениями: презентациями новых нейросетей и инструментов, гайдами по их выбору, обучением промптам и вайб-кодингу. Однако мы наблюдаем, что на этом фоне у бизнеса повышается актуальность стратегических и концептуальных вопросов: - Как изменится моя компания на самом деле? - Какие сотрудники будут нужны в ближайшем будущем, а чьи функции безвозвратно устареют? - Ч

1👏1💯1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC308 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔴 Уже сегодня в 10:30 состоится прямой эфир с Аркадием Цукером. Это будет второе интервью с Сергеем Журихиным, проректором Университета Правительства Москвы (МГУУ), посвященное управлению в эпоху перемен. Поговорим о том, как руководителю сохранять устойчивость команды, поддерживать синхронизацию, мотивацию и адаптивность в условиях постоянных изменений. Присоединяйтесь к трансляции онлайн, эфир будет доступен ср

🔥61🙏1

2 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC324 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @openeduspace

✔️✔️ Антихрупкость команды: инструменты ежедневной синхронизации и профилактики выгорания Продолжаем разговор об управлении в эпоху перемен. Когда правила меняются быстро, руководителю важно не только ставить новые цели, но и каждый день помогать команде сохранять фокус, энергию и готовность к изменениям. 🎙Как перевести принципы современного управления в понятные ежедневные шаги и как поддерживать команду так, что

🔥75👍3

31 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC420 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀Мы анонсируем НОВЫЙ стратегический круг! Спойлер: впервые в одной дискуссии встретятся человеческое и машинное мышление. Это уникальное событие мы создаём вместе с топовым экспертом практик внедрения ИИ. С Аркадием Цукером выступит Михаил Петухов, известный как Кибер-Миша. Основатель IT-компании BlackMesa, создатель ИИ-агента Protone ai, партнер Сбера по цифровой трансформации и резидент Сколково, автор канала о п

🔥53👍2

30 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC320 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Деловые выступления не всегда случаются в строгих залах при галстуке)) Когда «Кемп фасилитаторов» выпадает на суровую новосибирскую жару, точно можно всё!) ☀ Участники кемпа - руководители, для которых фасилитация - это не профессия, а навык, который они применяют в своей работе с людьми. Что делает фасилитатор-лидер? Держит качество вопросов. Мозг ленится думать, для него это дорого по энергии, вот он и норовит б

7🔥7👏1

29 Jul 2026, 07:43 UTC388 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вопрос про лошадей, который парализует бизнес ☄️ Конец XIX века. Крупные города завалены лошадиным навозом. Все в панике: через 20 лет улицы будут завалены по самые окна. Проводятся срочные совещания. Будущее мрачно и дурно пахнет. Затем появляется автомобиль. И вся эта арифметика с подсчетом навоза просто исчезает. Кучер сел за руль. Конюх пошел в механики. Извозчичья контора превратилась в автопарк. Профессии не

👍92

27 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC404 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Смена правил игры ⌛ Сельскохозяйственная и промышленная революции меняли не просто инструменты. Они меняли саму логику выживания, разделения труда и управления. Сегодня мы находимся внутри аналогичного цифрового сдвига. И, как нам видится, то, что происходит сейчас в компаниях, — это фокусировка на тактике, на инструментах. Какую нейросеть выбрать, как правильно написать промпт и т.д. Но стратегический вызов для с

👍3🔥21

24 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC477 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Перестаньте пятиться вперед» Этой фразой Аркадий Цукер завершил интервью в программе «В центре внимания» на Общественном телевидении России во Владивостоке. После дальневосточного мастер-класса “Бизнес-неваляшка 2.0” в эфире поговорили о том, что волнует сегодня руководителей, предпринимателей и команды: ● почему не стоит жить ожиданием «возвращения прежних времен»; ● как стать «неваляшкой» в бизнесе и научиться

10👍4👏2

16 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC577 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лаборатория мышления: как мы применяем свои инструменты на себе ⚙️ В новой рубрике #внутриУМа рассказываем, как мы командой Университета Мышления применяем свои же инструменты, тестируем новые подходы, ищем решения и превращаем идеи в работающие процессы. В общем, показываем сапожника в сапогах. Для нас это новый опыт, мы впервые открываем занавес нашего внутреннего мира и хотим быть предельно честны. Друзья, для н

🔥107

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @tsuker_thinking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 83,673 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Университет Мышления” (@tsuker_thinking), 2,425 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tsuker_thinking.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.