Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for የሀበሻ Girls

Channel

የሀበሻ Girls

@only_video_secret

6 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

7,624subscribers

+692 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002950130847
TypeChannel
Usernames@amhara @ethio @hot_ethio @only_video_secret @oromia @wesib
Created29 August 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/only_video_secret

Growth

6,9327,6247,2785 August 2026 — 6,932 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,942 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,942 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,941 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,974 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,981 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,981 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,013 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,019 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,034 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,034 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,036 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,040 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,060 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,162 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,224 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,230 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,256 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,258 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,253 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,386 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,390 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,419 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,450 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,453 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,470 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,624 subscribers5 August 202615 August 2026
27 measurements spanning 10 days, net +692. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,828–7,728 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:357,624+154
13 Aug 2026, 13:087,470+17
13 Aug 2026, 10:147,453+3
13 Aug 2026, 05:367,450+31
12 Aug 2026, 20:537,419+29
12 Aug 2026, 12:167,390+4
12 Aug 2026, 05:087,386+133
10 Aug 2026, 05:537,253-5
10 Aug 2026, 04:117,258+2
10 Aug 2026, 02:117,256+26
9 Aug 2026, 21:537,230+6
9 Aug 2026, 21:127,224+62
8 Aug 2026, 21:547,162+102
7 Aug 2026, 19:177,060+20
7 Aug 2026, 13:017,040+4
7 Aug 2026, 07:317,036+2
7 Aug 2026, 06:307,034no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:217,034+15
6 Aug 2026, 23:067,019+6
6 Aug 2026, 22:157,013first reading

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 29 August 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4,559 reactions across 1 post, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,67058.6%
👍4139.06%
3938.62%
🥰3908.55%
😍1443.16%
❤‍🔥1062.33%
🔥1042.28%
🤩1042.28%
🎉962.11%
🗿701.54%
🕊691.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,559reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2025 to 29 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2025, 13:33 UTC≈786,000 views4,559 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Join our channels and groups 🔠🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 🎸 🎸 👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾 For Full length video Subscribe premium 🎸 🎸 Star 🌟 https://t.me/+PbA5VK5lRX9iNGM0 🫂 Now you can send the gifts and you get the VIP ❤️ አዳዲስ ተለቀዋል 👇🏾 ⭐️ Telegram star payment ⭐️ ይ🀄️ላ🀄️ሉን👉https://t.me/addlist/ut3JxRo8g8g4NDNk 🫶 https://t.me/addlist/ut3JxRo8g8g4NDNk new habeshan>>https://t.me/habeshaz

2,670👍413393🥰390😍144❤‍🔥106🔥104🤩104

Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @only_video_secret. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@only_video_secret edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 41,842 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“የሀበሻ Girls” (@only_video_secret), 7,624 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/only_video_secret.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.