Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

only human™

@onlyHuman_tm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

817subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001929713035
TypeChannel
Username@onlyHuman_tm
DescriptionHANDMADE INTERIOR STUFF^ ⏎ MOSCOW Креативные предметы для интерьера ← Link: https://onlyhuman.moscow FAQ: @only_human_admin
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/onlyHuman_tm

Growth

8158178167 Aug 2026, 15:18 — 815 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 00:24 — 817 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:32 — 817 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:188 Aug 2026, 01:32
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 815–817 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 01:32817no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:24817+2
7 Aug 2026, 15:18815first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 23 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.1%
avg views ÷ 817 subscribers
Avg views / post
540
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (23 December 20256 August 2026)
Views total540
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
106
Videos
12
Links
36

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
33s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

354 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11532.5%
🔥8624.3%
custom 52110771716274373008524.0%
154.24%
custom 5408880430155836385123.39%
😍92.54%
🫡71.98%
👍61.69%
👏51.41%
❤‍🔥41.13%
💅41.13%
😨30.847%
🥰20.565%
🐳10.282%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 354reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 16 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @onlyHuman_tm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 December 2025 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC540 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔑 ID: RED-SOLO-001 🔄 :// NO PLASTIC 📎 { LINK }

23🔥8❤‍🔥4

8 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC689 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔴Sold out Через пару недель примерно будут еще

custom 5211077171627437300157🔥5😨3

6 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC≈1,010 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⏰ "FRAGILE" - УЖЕ НА САЙТЕ: → go to store

custom 521107717162743730019108

4 Jul 2026, 09:09 UTC630 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BigKrossowskiPhoto

Это не учебная тревога! Мы соскучились по кроссовочным тусовкам и в эту субботу собираемся в баре Method в своих самых бешеных кроссовках! План на вечер: Классная компания, много пива, розыгрыши ценных и памятных призов, мини-маркет, а так же спешл вечера!

🥰1

2 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC≈1,600 views34 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

💬 Продолжаем расширять коллекцию предметов бытового абсурда. На этот раз - керамический стакан в виде того самого красного пластикового стаканчика. Да-да, именно того, который десятилетиями мелькал в фильмах, сериалах и на каждой легендарной студенческой вечеринке. На этот раз всё как в старые добрые, сначала оффлайн-дроп. 🗓 В эту субботу (04.07) замечательный Артур собирает всех в 📍 METHOD Баре. Будет тёплая ат

🔥208custom 52110771716274373006

16 Jun 2026, 15:47 UTC690 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @svyatoemolodoeFile

nook zine 001 Вторая серия моих наблюдений о предметах для дома постепенно трансформировалась в небольшой зин. Здесь — локальные бренды, небольшие студии и объекты, за которыми стоит ясная идея и внимание к деталям. Каждый объект — это ссылка, которая ведёт прямо к предмету. Можно воспринимать это как подборку идей для подарков или как набор вещей, которыми просто приятно наполнять свое пространство. Дальше я пла

🔥10👍6👏41custom 52110771716274373001

5 Jun 2026, 09:31 UTC≈1,180 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎥 - иногда вещи настолько плотно вшиваются в культуру, что становятся больше, чем просто брендом. Эта небольшая тестовая серия - требьют одному из самых узнаваемых символов спортивной и стиртвир индустрии. → store

11💅4🔥3

5 Jun 2026, 09:05 UTC682 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

•снова в наличии вазы "SPRAY CAN / GRAFFITI" в чёрном и оранжевом цветах 🧡🖤 // пополнение небольшое, так что кто спрашивал - усппевайте. •после этого будет пауза примерно на 1–1,5 месяца — хочу немного переделать форму и выпустить обновлённую версию баллонов [2.0]. upd:^ еще остались две вазы-баллона в черном цвете - они вообще последние, из-за путанницы решил отказаться от ваз в таком исполнении, потом будут со

6custom 52110771716274373002🐳1👏1custom 54088804301558363851

14 May 2026, 17:10 UTC781 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💬 >💭 Пздц, как давно меня не было в уличных гонках. Я не пропал - просто объём работы был на уровне «посплю когда-нибудь потом» 💤 ____________ Из хорошего: впереди ресток старых айтемов + новые штуки для дома. Медленно, но уверенно превращаю всё это в маленький культ бытового абсурда. ____ Плюс хочу сделать отдельный тг-канал. Да, звучит как оху&@#ая идея, особенно после блокировки телеги. Но зато там не будет нич

19🫡7custom 52110771716274373005

23 Feb 2026, 07:27 UTC≈1,210 views23 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

HBD 2 ME^ др у меня, а подарки для вас! Сегодня, до конца дня скидки на все 🛒

custom 5211077171627437300173🔥3

19 Feb 2026, 18:20 UTC≈1,280 views36 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Такс, чутка апдейта, пока новостей мало → ◉ 2К26 - мддааааа...новые приколы уже всех задели или пока прошли мимо? Я слегка в а**е, честно говоря ◉ Сейчас думаю, как оптимизировать все рабочие процессы, чтобы оставаться в прежнем формате. Поднять ценник - самый простой вариант, но это оставим на крайний случай. ◉ Ждём марта и нового закона для брендов. Реалии могут заставить делать полный ребрендинг - старый неймин

22custom 52110771716274373009custom 54088804301558363853😍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @onlyHuman_tm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 306,166 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“only human™” (@onlyHuman_tm), 817 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onlyHuman_tm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.