Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

METHOD • Beer & Munchies

@methodbeermunchies

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

329subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002045787916
TypeChannel
Username@methodbeermunchies
DescriptionКанал о вкусном пиве и необычных пивных закусках, которые можно попробовать в г. Москве по адресу: Товарищеский пер., 4, стр. 5
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/methodbeermunchies

Growth

3296 Aug 2026, 18:19 — 329 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 21:47 — 329 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:196 Aug 2026, 21:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 328–330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 21:47329no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:19329first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
97.0%
avg views ÷ 329 subscribers
Avg views / post
319
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026
Posts held8 (4 June 202615 July 2026)
Views total638
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
138
Videos
2
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 8 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3432.4%
1918.1%
👍1110.5%
🍓76.67%
😍76.67%
❤‍🔥43.81%
🖕43.81%
😁43.81%
👏32.86%
🎃21.90%
👎21.90%
🗿21.90%
10.952%
🍾10.952%
😇10.952%
🤷10.952%
🥰10.952%
🥴10.952%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 20:44 UTC331 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Идеальный вечер в баре выглядит так Номер для брони столов на просмотр финала чм: +7 (903) 163-22-43

😍7🔥4👏3🗿2🤷1

14 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTC307 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

WORLD CUP Внезапно сегодня решили провести трансляцию последних матчей чм, ведь метод - идеальное место для просмотра футбола. Итак: финальное расписание матчей Вторник / полуфинал/ - 🇫🇷🇪🇸 22:00 Среда / полуфинал/ - 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇦🇷 22:00 Воскресенье / финал - 22:00 Номер для брони столов: +7 (903) 163-22-43 Матчи обещают быть жаркими. Увидимся на баре ⚽️🍻

👍54👎2🔥2🥴1

6 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC412 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

На тех выходных пили пиво с ребятами из сообщества «Большой Кроссовски» Фотоотчет тут

7👍2🔥2

25 Jun 2026, 15:53 UTC768 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Для тех, кто давно мечтал стать частью команды нашего бара — разыскиваем повара! За всеми подробностями пишите @RealShitMan 🤝

4🖕4

24 Jun 2026, 13:36 UTC706 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @nuw_storePhoto

Смотрели Чемпионат мира в хорошей компании 🫶🏼⚽️ Какой? Прикрепляем фотографии! Полный отчет в другой нашей соцсети. Какой? Догадаетесь сами 👀 Находите себя и друзей по этой ссылке 👈🏻 Выражаем огромное мерси Маше за эти карточки!

👍3🔥211

15 Jun 2026, 14:34 UTC659 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

FOCACCIA ROAST BEEEEEF Спешл на ближайшие две недели: кукурузная фокачча собственного приготовления с ростбифом, печёным перцем, сыром и свежим салатом. Всё это заправили гуакамоле, чипотле айоли и перечно-медовым соусом. Большой, сочный, мясной сэндвич! Особенно хорош в компании ледяного пенного. Уже в меню

🔥11👍1🥰1😇1

4 Jun 2026, 13:15 UTC766 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Пару дней назад тестировали с командой живительный напиток — залпачи нитро-стаутов Сегодня в программе.

🔥13😁43🍾1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @methodbeermunchies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 350,392 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“METHOD • Beer & Munchies” (@methodbeermunchies), 329 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/methodbeermunchies.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.