Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

oneemo.花🌱

@oneemooo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

562subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001657218018
TypeChannel
Username@oneemooo
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/oneemooo

Growth

5626 Aug 2026, 20:18 — 562 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:38 — 562 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:187 Aug 2026, 02:38
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 561–563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:38562no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:18562first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 9 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
120.8%
avg views ÷ 562 subscribers
Avg views / post
679
1 post measured
Reaction rate
14.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held18 (9 April 202529 July 2026)
Views total679
Reactions total98
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,227 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
72722.5%
🍓60918.9%
🍌48515.0%
🔥48515.0%
💘2277.03%
custom 52107558092894451941865.76%
🥰1725.33%
custom 5256237983945732909842.60%
custom 5361987466117000927762.36%
custom 5254006610996507915712.20%
🕊491.52%
custom 5422351225712552359441.36%
❤‍🔥90.279%
💋30.093%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,227reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
330
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 18 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
57
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oneemooo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 April 2025 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC679 views98 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

всем привет дорогие паписчики! Увезли меня на рисовые поля далеко далеко, работала за миску риса и два юаня, жестко меня там туда сюда…. на долго пропала, кое-как сбежала чтоб к вам вернуться рисовать красивые картинки 😧

🍓72🍌26

21 May 2026, 14:59 UTC499 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @asianfant_eksmoPhoto

🐈 Рады представить новинку от Юй Сы – новеллу «Белый кот старейшины Цунчжэ»! ❞ Самое классическое сянься на свете: секта заклинателей, совершенствование, полеты на мечах и огромный мир. • обложка от oneemo; • 10 ч/б иллюстраций от Shell; • бонус за предзаказ – стикерпак от oneemo; • всего 2 тома; • ожидаем в июле! Десять тысяч лет назад Нефритовый император изгнал предателей с Небес, заточил за Барьером и поставил

🍓28🍌10

27 Mar 2026, 15:13 UTC773 views179 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мобейчик🙂

🍌106custom 525400661099650791545🍓28

9 Mar 2026, 14:54 UTC913 views182 reactions11 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

С прошедшим 8 марта дамы! 🌹

🍌104🍓52custom 525400661099650791526

14 Feb 2026, 11:13 UTC988 views149 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

С Днём Святого Валентина 🌸💕 Поиграла в игрульку на днях, не думала, что так понравится, но гиперфикс на старость лет получила👍 В коммах бонусом закину скэч этого артика

🍓101custom 536198746611700092731🍌17

1 Feb 2026, 17:37 UTC≈1,010 views179 reactions15 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Скетчики 🤩

🍌106custom 536198746611700092745🍓28

25 Jan 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,190 views289 reactions11 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😏

173🍌58🍓45custom 52562379839457329098🔥5

4 Jan 2026, 14:49 UTC≈1,200 views187 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Первая випка в новом году, всех с опозданием поздравляю! 🍾 🎉

🔥11150🍓23💋3

27 Dec 2025, 12:46 UTC≈1,240 views174 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Откапала доисторический скетч (скину в коммы) и захотелось закончить, как же стиль поменялся с того времени….

💘106🍓3826🔥4

11 Nov 2025, 16:00 UTC≈1,660 views220 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Первый арт по мдк на этом канале, ура!

🍓12649🍌31❤‍🔥8🔥5🥰1

14 Oct 2025, 14:03 UTC≈1,220 views191 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Октябрь 2024 -2025🫡

🔥11739🕊22🍓7💘5❤‍🔥1

17 Sept 2025, 16:09 UTC≈1,440 views169 reactions50 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну какой же он………………………😫

🔥118🍌25custom 5210755809289445194233

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @oneemooo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 515,298 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“oneemo.花🌱” (@oneemooo), 562 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oneemooo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.