Channel
@shayisi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,306subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001249205231 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shayisi |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shayisi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 2,306 | +37 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 2,269 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 2,262 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 2,265 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 2,265 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,012 |
| Reactions total | 991 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
654 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5775889057796066870 | 182 | 27.8% | |
| custom 5235589164166032324 | 162 | 24.8% | |
| custom 5337199783922641650 | 139 | 21.3% | |
| custom 5294500430246584263 | 52 | 7.95% | |
| ❤ | 40 | 6.12% | |
| custom 5413786201930868732 | 27 | 4.13% | |
| custom 5334573699183954373 | 17 | 2.60% | |
| 🌚 | 13 | 1.99% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.765% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.612% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.612% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.459% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.459% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.306% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.153% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 991reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кстати, всех с днем пива 🐓 А давааайте накидаете мне всяких вопросиков, а я на все отвечу? Давно не было такого актива 👍 Щас опять никто не придет на фан-встречу, я все знаю
custom 52355891641660323244custom 57758890577960668704custom 53371997839226416503❤1
Ого, обнаружила, что со стикерами котика еще можно заказать в ЧГ — и цена не отличается от обычного котика 😧😧😧
custom 523558916416603232420custom 57758890577960668707custom 53345736991839543735❤1🍓1
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Здравствуйте! Как вы успеваете столько переводить? Какими инструментами пользуетесь? На самом деле, я сейчас сравнительно мало перевожу, потому что времени не так много(( Да и книжки у меня сейчас значительно меньше (последняя была на 4 алки всего!) — а сроки чуть больше. Ну и самое главное во всем этом — правильный тайм-менеджмент. Могу сказать, что со своими 100500 работами я в …
custom 523558916416603232426custom 577588905779606687011❤7custom 53371997839226416504
Мне казалось, что я писала такой пост, но пыталась найти для Ани Кей и не смогла! Итак, почему китайцы называют детей такими похожими именами? Вернее сказать — с одним и тем же иероглифом и чаще всего первым. Вы поняли, о чем я? О кошмаре переводчика О традиционном нейминге из трех составляющих: 🩷Фамилия (姓, син): общая для всего рода. 🩷Поколенческий иероглиф (字辈, цзыбэй): общий для всех членов одного поколения в …
custom 533719978392264165041custom 577588905779606687018custom 53345736991839543736❤2🤯2
Редактор говорит, так что поводов не верить нету, ждем экранизацию в Голливуде 💅 Вопрос, правда, где мои бабки
custom 533719978392264165038custom 529450043024658426322custom 541378620193086873218😁4❤2custom 57758890577960668701
❤️❤️❤️
custom 57758890577960668709
🐈 Пусть цитаты с котиком из новеллы Юй Сы «Белый кот старейшины Цунчжэ» скрасят ваш день! Томик уже в продаже: Читай-город | OZON | Wildberries #белый_кот_старейшины_цунчжэ
custom 533719978392264165029custom 523558916416603232418custom 54137862019308687329❤1custom 52945004302465842631custom 57758890577960668701
Кооооотик ❤️
custom 577588905779606687012❤1
Пытаюсь в рисование животных день ххх Почему тигры по строению морды не могут быть просто кошечками побольше? (хохо как будто я кошек рисую правильно, ну да ну да) по крайней мере он милый 😝 #в_черной_краске
custom 577588905779606687034custom 529450043024658426316custom 523558916416603232412❤6custom 53371997839226416505
— Хм-ф! — во всеуслышание фыркнул пятисотлетний Дракон, поворачиваясь к главе клана Собаки. — Нарываешься? — злобно спросил он. — Что вы, что вы, — отмахнулся Сюй Ин, а его улыбка даже не дрогнула. — Вы так злитесь из-за ранения? Не переживайте, правду ведь говорят: открытый удар легко отразить, а скрытую стрелу трудно предотвратить. Если бы до этого Юй Ху не провел с Сюй Ином некоторое время и не убедился, что тот —…
custom 523558916416603232428custom 529450043024658426313custom 53371997839226416505custom 53345736991839543732❤1
Очень долго смотрела 14-серийную дораму, и вот НАКОНЕЦ-ТО завершила ее 😠 Итак, корейская «Белоснежка должна умереть дорама» О чем: В центре истории — парень Го Чон У, которого обвинили в убийстве одноклассниц. Спустя 10 лет тюрьмы он возвращается домой, где местный детектив помогает раскрыть правду о тех событиях. Всего 14 серий, но смотрела почти месяц (но и занятость моя пипец). Мальчиков красивых тут, увы, мне …
custom 523558916416603232419custom 577588905779606687012custom 53371997839226416506🔥3❤1
Сегодня каталог Литрес пополнился очаровательной новинкой от Юй Сы 😊 🥰 «Белый кот старейшины Цунчжэ. Том 1» Аудиокнига | Электронная История, что родилась из двенадцати зодиакальных животных и старейшины, который не умеет чувствовать, и разрослась до целой вселенной, где главным себя почему-то возомнил кот. Сянься, котики и юмор – всё, как мы любим😎
custom 523558916416603232432custom 577588905779606687014❤9custom 53345736991839543734
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shayisi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 26,108 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ша исы | Алиса Атарова (Юй Сы) 18+” (@shayisi), 2,306 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shayisi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.