Russian parliamentarism in a nutshell. Ну, что ж, с Богом. Источник: телеграм-канал «Выборы в деталях». 📰 Подписаться на блог 🏢 Оставить подпись за инициативу №77Ф149506 (памятка по голосованию)
👀85❤33🔥11
Signed Maksim Vakhtin

Channel
@okolonauchniyebredni
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
779subscribers
+378 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002364355014 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @okolonauchniyebredni |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/okolonauchniyebredni |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:08 | 779 | -7 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:39 | 786 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:07 | 789 | +313 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 15:20 | 476 | +258 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:23 | 218 | no change |
| 26 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 218 | -281 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 499 | -254 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 753 | -68 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 821 | -53 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 874 | +504 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 370 | -31 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 401 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (9 September 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 282 |
| Reactions total | 129 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 20:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,067 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,453 | 56.9% | |
| 🔥 | 2,496 | 41.1% | |
| 👀 | 118 | 1.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,067 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Russian parliamentarism in a nutshell. Ну, что ж, с Богом. Источник: телеграм-канал «Выборы в деталях». 📰 Подписаться на блог 🏢 Оставить подпись за инициативу №77Ф149506 (памятка по голосованию)
👀85❤33🔥11
Signed Maksim Vakhtin
Posted without readable text
❤110🔥77
Signed Maksim Vakhtin
Posted without readable text
❤227🔥140
Signed Maksim Vakhtin
Дело было вчерашним вечером, после возвращения домой с зачёта по дисциплине «Правовое регулирование отношений в сфере закупок для государственных и муниципальных нужд» (очень важная дисциплина на выпускном курсе, by the way) в девять вечера делать было определённо больше нечего. Обсудили с коллегами, пришли к единому логичному мнению, но, тем не менее, ситуация выглядит забавно. Вопрос на логику. Решил посмотреть, к…
❤223🔥86
Signed Maksim Vakhtin
Posted without readable text
❤1,140🔥472
Signed Maksim Vakhtin
Как мог выглядеть состав Государственной Думы Федерального Собрания Российской Федерации девятого созыва — аналитика научной интеллигенции. Возвращаясь к монографии («Глава 15. Роль избирательной модели в обеспечении представительности и качества законотворческой деятельности») и результатам выборов, напомню предложенную модель: снизить проходной порог до 2,5% и использовать исключительно пропорциональную систему с …
🔥648❤373
Signed Maksim Vakhtin
Posted without readable text
❤456🔥240
Signed Maksim Vakhtin
Выборы в Государственную Думу Федерального Собрания Российской Федерации девятого созыва — главное. Результаты дистанционного электронного голосования (единый федеральный округ, 32 субъекта Российской Федерации). 🔗Источник: официальный сайт Центральной избирательной комиссии Российской Федерации. 🔗Явка: 90,8%. 🔗Всего участников по списку: 4,017 млн чел. 🔗Получили бюллетени: 3,650 млн. чел. 🔗Распределение мест: 1…
🔥160❤54
Signed Maksim Vakhtin
Выборы в Государственную Думу Федерального Собрания Российской Федерации девятого созыва — главное. ❗️Актуально на 13:31 21 сентября. 🔗Источник: официальный сайт Центральной избирательной комиссии Российской Федерации. 🔗Явка: 59,32% (на 4,51% больше, чем в 1993; на 5,44% меньше, чем в 1995; на 2,53% меньше, чем в 1999; на 3,57% больше, чем в 2003; на 4,46% меньше, чем в 2007; на 0,89% меньше, чем в 2011; на 11,44%…
🔥193❤98
Signed Maksim Vakhtin
Цифры экзитполов комментировать не хочу, так как не вижу в этом особого аналитического смысла: к ним, ровно так же, как и к ВЦИОМовским опросам, нужно относиться исключительно с пониманием к деятельности людей. А вот эта новость достаточно интересная. По закону «агитация предвыборная (предвыборная агитация» (ага, в законе именно так и написано, можете проверить сами) - это «деятельность, осуществляемая в период изби…
❤94🔥66
Signed Maksim Vakhtin
Ну что ж, избирательные участки по стране закрываются, календарь медленно, но верно движется к началу новой рабочей недели. Поэтому заряжаемся энергией (яблочки в этом году отличаются определённым вкусовым своеобразием), вспоминаем конституционные положения и покорно ждём результатов. Информационный и аналитический поток ближайших недель будет большим, так что скучать, полагаю, не придётся. Будем смотреть на результ…
❤56🔥36
Signed Maksim Vakhtin
Научная интеллигенция свой выбор сделала. А вы, уважаемые читатели? 📰 Подписаться на блог 🏢 Оставить подпись за инициативу №77Ф149506 (памятка по голосованию)
❤251🔥152
Signed Maksim Vakhtin
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @okolonauchniyebredni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Привет, это Максимович” (@okolonauchniyebredni), 779 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okolonauchniyebredni.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.