Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

277 π’πŠπˆππƒπ€π™

@ofcskindaz

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

827subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002007409152
TypeChannel
Username@ofcskindaz
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ofcskindaz

Growth

827830828.56 Aug 2026, 09:23 β€” 830 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 15:16 β€” 830 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:57 β€” 827 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:237 Aug 2026, 07:57
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 827–830 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 07:57827-3
6 Aug 2026, 15:16830no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:23830first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 22 March 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

26 May 2026, 14:20 UTC210 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @OFCGOSBLARRPhoto

β™‘γ€€ ❍  βŒ²γ€€ β€’β€’γ€€ βŽ™ Liked by @Injectoors and 99 others. @OFCGOSBLARR proudly presents its first collaboration with the circles listed below πŸ•·πŸ•· Thank you to everyone who participated and became part of GOSBLARR’s opening journey. Your support and presence truly mean a lot to us. We hope this collaboration continues in a positive and solid way moving forward. ⛓️‍πŸ’₯⛓️‍πŸ’₯ πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ SPECIAL TAG ; @KASEPOFFICIAL @fesfur @viusboy…

1 May 2026, 14:51 UTCβ‰ˆ4,080 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

γ…€ γ…€β™‘ ❍ ⌲ β€’β€’ π—Ÿπ—Άπ—Έπ—²π—± π—―π˜† @ofcskindaz and 21.122.023 others. βž₯COLLABORATION Big thanks to all partners who made this collaboration a success, your participation is very valuable to us. ✷Special Tag✷ @JobesOfc @wardoettpride @masexiest @tracoxx @baceno @thecabolers @berculley @thefoger @ofcjabrix

28 Apr 2026, 03:55 UTC804 viewsread 6 August 2026

Selamat pagi skindie! admin skindaz telah melakukan pembersihan, bagi yang merasa masih menggunakan atb skindaz silahkan di lepas dan bisa mengikuti oplink skindaz selanjutnya, terimakasih. – all crew skindaz

17 Apr 2026, 09:23 UTC706 viewsread 6 August 2026

πŸ“ LIST NAMA SQUAD yang di ajak collab nama squad+usn squad πŸ‘€ @thefoger πŸ‘€ @ofcbossride πŸ‘€ @masexiest @baceno πŸ‘€ culley @berculley πŸ‘€ Cabol @TheCabolers πŸ‘₯ 5 people have voted so far. πŸ“– Anonymous Board

10 Apr 2026, 09:15 UTC751 viewsread 6 August 2026

πŸ¦‹ Selamat sore skindie! admin skindaz telah melakukan pembersihan, bagi yang merasa masih menggunakan atb skindaz silahkan di lepas dan bisa mengikuti oplink skindaz selanjutnya, terimakasih. 🀩 – all crew skindaz βœ”οΈ

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ofcskindaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 271,427 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 42 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œ277 π’πŠπˆππƒπ€π™β€ (@ofcskindaz), 827 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ofcskindaz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.