Channel
@jabierofc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
11,123subscribers
-199 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001465692467 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jabierofc |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jabierofc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:39 | 11,123 | -28 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 11,151 | -19 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 11,170 | -23 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 11,193 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 11,204 | -63 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 11,267 | -23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 11,290 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 11,306 | -15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 11,321 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 11,322 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
109 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 | 58 | 53.2% | |
| 💯 | 51 | 46.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2025 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📝 saran kudu koleb sm sq mna 👤 @TheJendral 👤 @ofcswayzvar 👤 @thebornside 👤 @OFCRUBRIX 👤 @kobrekk 👤 urpw 👤 @kobrekk 👤 @kobrekk 👤 @kobrekk & @thekarpol 👤 @ofcbraderboys 👤 ofc lextro boys 👥 11 people have voted so far. 📖 Anonymous Board
just for information that @ofcmontexs is one of the "subun" sub-unit of @jabierofc so everything about is related to each other.
🏆5💯5
cookies🤍
– what are your complaints if you are reluctant to come to our bot @aljabier_bot
✆ ˓ before you enter the zone, please send your data @jabierofc we make sure you are a member and part of jabier's. warning to rules and attributes must be used 🔢 ⚠️ قبل دخولك المنطقة يا ، نتأكد من أنك عضو وجزء من عائلة جابير. تأكد من التزامك بجميع القواعد وارتداء الملابس المناسبة. 👥 hi @jabierofc i am a member, i joined this squad to find friends and want to be part of al - jabier. i hope this squad will shine lik…
🏆9💯9
🌟 🌟🌟
💄💄💄🇧🇪
ㅤㅤ 🚨 @jabierofc : 99,99% ** ━━━ ► ㅤㅤㅤ www.galeryaljabier.com ㅤㅤㅤ
🏆6💯3
🌟 est. II — @jabierofc there is no hope other than the same prayer every year. " happy anniversary " ®
💯3
even after you leave this virtual zone, i hope you will always remember that you were once in the home.
💯19🏆14
💋💋💋💋💋💄💄💄 @jabierofc JABIER EVENT karena vibes Ramadhan udah mulai kerasa nih, kita mau ngadain event kecil-kecilan sekalian menyambut Ramadhan. jadi buat yang Muslim, yuk ceritain Day 1 puasa kalian. Mulai dari drama sahur ( kebangun gak? sahur mepet imsak? atau malah lanjut tidur 😭 ), terus aktivitas seharian nahan lapar & haus, momen buka puasa yang paling ditunggu, sampe taraweh kalo ikut juga boleh banget. ceri…
🏆7
🤩🤩🇧🇪
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @jabierofc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 44,388 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 50 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jabierofc named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OFC AL-JABIER🇧🇪” (@jabierofc), 11,123 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jabierofc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.