Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Очевидец

@ochevidets_LPR

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

168subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002790086027
TypeChannel
Username@ochevidets_LPR
DescriptionКто ты на этой войне? Солдат, журналист... Или просто - очевидец? Авторский канал с воспоминаниями и размышлениями.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ochevidets_LPR

Growth

1687 Aug 2026, 17:00 — 168 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:32 — 168 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:008 Aug 2026, 15:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 167–169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:32168no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:00168first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
800.6%
avg views ÷ 168 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,340
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held15 (13 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total18,829
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
104
Videos
66
Links
73

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
48s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1737.8%
1022.2%
🔥613.3%
👏511.1%
🤣511.1%
💯24.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC32 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mig41

⚡️Автора тг-канала "Повёрнутые на войне" и разработчика дрона "Упырь" Владимира Т. подорвали в его Mercedes-Benz под Екатеринбургом — сработало взрывное устройство, заложенное под автомобиль. — MASH Всё произошло в посёлке Большой Исток Сысертского округа. Водитель-охранник Ткачука погиб на месте. Самого разработчика забрала скорая, его состояние сейчас не известно. Он и его родные не отвечают на звонки.

27 Jul 2026, 18:58 UTC≈1,470 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чечня умеет удивлять. Рэд Булл в бутылке - Австрия. Рэд Булл в банке - Тайланд. Кола ваниль - США. Кола в жб 0.5 - Великобритания. 🙈

🔥2

26 Jul 2026, 20:24 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 8 August 2026

Хохлы хуярят Крым изо дня в день. Проблемы с электричеством, водоснабжением, топливом. Что делать? - потратить деньги на оснащение/увеличение числа МОГов - вложиться в оснащение местных Барсов и иже дронами-перехватчиками - озаботиться повышением безопасности сухопутного коридора или Крымского моста - подкинуть деньжат крымским барыгам от турбизнеса, которые даже с учетом всех рисков ломят цены и с недовольным е

26 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC≈1,370 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не знаю, как насчет эффективности массового применения такого подхода - но это банально интересно. Над морем, над степью - воздушные МОГи могли бы снизить число пролётов вражеских БПЛА. А это уже результат. Ещё один заслон, дополнительный фильтр неба - не будет лишним точно. У нас огромная база подготовки пилотов, которая из года в год выдает нагора лётчиков и штурманов. У нас остался без дела после начала СВО внуш

💯2

26 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC≈1,570 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Возвращаясь к вопросу РСЗО на базе НРТК "Импульс" - немного видео.

🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,530 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всем нам иногда не хватает такой простой, старой доброй перестрелки. Чтоб не вот это вот все дроновое, а нормальный общевойсковой бой, пусть даже в масштабе отделения... Эх, верните мне мой 2022-й. Ну а админам канала Минобороны очередной лайк за годный контент. https://t.me/mod_russia/65896

🔥2

24 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC82 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Итак, отпуск. Происходящее в акватории Чёрного моря, плюс нелюбовь к курортам Краснодарского края в целом сподвигли меня проехать лишние несколько сотен километровой и приехать в Дагестан. Из путевых заметок - ехал в ночь, где-то около 22:00-23:00 заправился на объездной Ростова на Лукойле совершенно без проблем, 50 литров (больше было не нужно) по нормальной цене. В течение ночи, пока ехал через Ставропольский к

23 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю, что происходит, но мне это нравится 😎

20 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,600 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Это просто что-то запредельное) Хохлы ТЦК ругают - а они вот как работают, везде уклонистов ищут. Не ругайтесь в играх, пацаны, Вы ТЦК всегда нужны 🙈 Очевидец

🤣5

19 Jul 2026, 20:59 UTC≈1,520 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На фоне увлекатальной новости выше, поломался даже админ канала Минобороны)))

👍2👏1

19 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC≈1,530 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Когда укропы пытаются в антикриз - всегда получается что-то такое. 4-я бригада как всегда дает врагу прикурить, причем уже не только на земле, но и в информационном пространстве. Когда укроп врет? Каждый раз, когда открывает рот.

👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ochevidets_LPR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Очевидец” (@ochevidets_LPR), 168 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ochevidets_LPR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.