Channel
@obraz_real
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
7,420subscribers
-4,203 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003597039841 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @obraz_real |
| Description | Меняем будущее. Инсайды, мысли, разговоры о власти, бизнесе и людях. @obraz_real_bot № 7058761189 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/obraz_real |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @ostorozhno_starosti/32630 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC | @obraz_real/220 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ai_lilu/22430 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC | @obraz_real/220 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC | 1.00 | 6.9 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @ostorozhno_starosti | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @ostorozhno_starosti (3–2) |
| @ai_lilu | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 67 minutes | @ai_lilu (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 121 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:34 | 7,420 | -4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:08 | 7,424 | -6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:15 | 7,430 | -14 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:51 | 7,444 | -1,358 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:01 | 8,802 | -11 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:27 | 8,813 | -1,328 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 10,141 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:49 | 10,143 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:01 | 10,144 | -7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 10,151 | -1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:04 | 10,152 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 10,155 | -3 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 07:44 | 10,158 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 07:27 | 10,161 | -2 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 10,163 | -2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 19:09 | 10,165 | -5 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 07:38 | 10,170 | -8 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 10,178 | -25 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 10,203 | -5 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 10,208 | first reading |
122 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 122 (30 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 95,590 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 05:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥱 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 122 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 122 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 48 posts held from the last 30 days (18.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇸🇰 Фицо рассказал о крике Мерца из-за санкций против России Премьер-министр Словакии Роберт Фицо заявил, что канцлер Германии Фридрих Мерц накричал на него из-за блокировки антироссийских санкций Евросоюза, сообщает Denník N. «Я что, должен сейчас бояться того, что говорит немецкий канцлер? Я помню наш первый разговор, когда он позвонил мне и кричал, что я себе позволяю, блокируя санкции против России, потому что э…
🛡 НАТО перестраивает стратегию под противостояние с Россией Альянс готовит крупнейшую за два десятилетия перестройку военной стратегии, пишет Politico. 32 страны — члена НАТО определят, какие силы и вооружение предоставят союзники в случае конфликта с Россией и кто возьмёт на себя расходы. Ключевое изменение: от участников больше не будут ожидать одновременного ведения крупной войны в Европе и нескольких малых мис…
Онлайн-продажа вина: удобство или новая угроза? Госдума рассматривает законопроект о дистанционной продаже вина через «Почту России». Депутат Марина Ким выступила против: «Я, как многодетная мать и как депутат, который ежедневно борется за безопасность наших детей, категорически против инициативы онлайн-продажи вина через “Почту России”. Этим законом мы сделаем алкоголь более доступным для людей. Для чего, зачем? Вс…
Почта не винная лавка Депутат Амир Хамитов выступил категорически против дистанционной продажи вина через инфраструктуру «Почты России». По его словам, это «опасный шаг назад» и расширение каналов сбыта алкоголя, а не мера поддержки отечественного виноделия. Хамитов обращает внимание на несоответствие формата. «Почта» — социально значимая инфраструктура: пенсии, документы, посылки. Её функция — обеспечивать доверие…
Дефицит бюджета как цена структурного маневра Минфин отчитался о дефиците федерального бюджета за январь–октябрь: 5,23 трлн руб. Доходы составили 33,18 трлн руб. (+11% к прошлому году), расходы — 38,41 трлн руб. (+13,4%). Внутри доходов картина разнонаправленная. Ненефтегазовые поступления выросли на 19,1%, до 26,73 трлн руб. Нефтегазовые, напротив, просели на 14,1%, до 6,44 трлн руб. Минфин прямо связывает это с с…
📍От Пскова до Якутии: почему регионы возражают против алкоголя онлайн У территорий разная ситуация, но общий вывод: дистанционная торговля может ослабить действующую систему ограничений. 🔹 Томская область сомневается в надёжности онлайн-проверки возраста и не поддерживает инициативу даже в экспериментальном формате. По мнению заместителя председателя правительства Светланы Грузных, недостаточная проработка механизм…
⚖️ Иностранцам в российских СИЗО разрешили общаться с консулами по видеосвязи Госдума приняла закон, который позволяет находящимся под стражей иностранцам проводить видеосвидания с представителями консульств. Для встречи потребуется письменное разрешение органа, ведущего уголовное дело, и ходатайство заключённого или консула. В свидании могут отказать, если оно затрагивает права других лиц или интересы уголовного с…
Северная модель: пьют меньше, но тяжелее Сеченовский университет подсчитал: в 2025 году злоупотребление алкоголем обошлось России в 1,484 трлн рублей — это 0,7% ВВП. Прямые затраты здравоохранения составили почти 85 млрд, но основная часть — 1,399 трлн — это непрямые потери: преждевременная смерть трудоспособных, снижение производительности, содержание детей погибших и заключенных. Любопытный парадокс: потребление …
Алкогольный эксперимент не пройдёт, регионы – против Неоднозначную инициативу – легализацию онлайн-продажи алкоголя через «Почту России» обсудили «в полях». Как сообщает депутат Нина Останина, уже 34 региона выступили против или выразили серьёзные опасения. Аргументы приводят разные, но веские, из собственной практики: 🔴 Дагестан предупреждает о рисках покупки через посредников и передачи заказов несовершеннолетним…
💧 Почти 700 млн рублей направят на модернизацию водной инфраструктуры регионов Курганская область и Пермский край получат дополнительное финансирование из федерального бюджета на развитие систем водоотведения. Средства направят на строительство современных очистных комплексов и насосных станций, а также реконструкцию существующих сетей. Как отметил премьер-министр Михаил Мишустин, реализация проектов позволит повы…
🇷🇺 Лавров обсудил ситуацию на Украине с главой МИД Перу Министр иностранных дел России Сергей Лавров проинформировал перуанского коллегу Карлоса Эспу о последних оценках развития ситуации на Украине. Стороны также обсудили обстановку в зоне специальной военной операции. Об этом Лавров сообщил на итоговой пресс-конференции по результатам встречи. Мы на связи везде: Telegram | VK | OK
Пени за неуплату налогов начнут капать со 2 декабря Со 2 декабря за каждый день просрочки по имущественным налогам начисляются пени. Долг будет расти примерно на 47 копеек в день с каждой тысячи рублей, сообщил глава комитета Госдумы по малому и среднему предпринимательству Станислав Дружинин. Последний день оплаты — 1 декабря. Депутат рекомендовал не тянуть до последнего: в этот день и накануне сайты и банки бываю…
Showing the 12 most recent of 122 posts we hold for @obraz_real. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@obraz_real edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 1 post on @obraz_real as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Образ настоящего” (@obraz_real), 7,420 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obraz_real.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.