Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Obbed

Channel

Obbed

@obbedupdates

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

622subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003786528182
TypeChannel
Username@obbedupdates
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 19 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/obbedupdates

Growth

621622621.57 Aug 2026, 15:31 — 621 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:01 — 621 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:24 — 622 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:318 Aug 2026, 15:24
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 621–622 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:24622+1
8 Aug 2026, 03:01621no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:31621first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 19 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.8%
avg views ÷ 622 subscribers
Avg views / post
403
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held11 (19 February 202622 July 2026)
Views total403
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

146 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6041.1%
🔥3020.5%
🤮3020.5%
👍96.16%
🥰64.11%
❤‍🔥32.05%
😁21.37%
👀10.685%
😱10.685%
🙈10.685%
🤡10.685%
🤣10.685%
🤬10.685%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC403 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Anyone has Latest Link / Downloads to the Following tools: Stellar AIO Bot: https://stellaraio.com/ Refract Bot: https://help.refractbot.com/ Cybersole Bot: https://cybersole.io/ If you are willing share latest Downloads for one of any please DM me, for Reverse Engineering I mean latest, not some Old Crap or GitHub Crap that is Obviously old Most likely would need an actual Subscription to these for a Download so

👍8

13 Jul 2026, 01:57 UTC882 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Check this Small easy Side Project I quickly Whipped up :D We got one more Side Project today, Evil Vector/LSposed (Dump Xposed Module Information such as what Java Methods are being Hooked, and What Values are Set for Results) coming Soon ! Note, you do not need this Project if you use the Official LSPosed, as they have a "Invalidate Inline Hooks" Feature built in, this would be more so useful for LSP Forks or Fri

9🔥4🤬1

18 May 2026, 05:43 UTC≈1,340 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Join in if your interested, not much talking unless I guess if I respond questions, more straight coding, and Clanker Coding, Need more Speed, Research so Clanker will Help us (hopefully I hope) Doing (3) Clanker Tasks, [1] for the Protection Help Get this new Fix for Resolving Xposed Types Going [2] for some Research + Stack Trace Research DEV [3] for some UI for [stackplz] Then to switch back n forth to Code, as t

10🔥1🤡1

28 Feb 2026, 22:17 UTC≈2,120 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @FakeVisitPhoto

👍 Not bad Completed for Now, Since there can be many Broadcasts, it has its own Seperate Tab as well as (Boot Complete) Not bad 😎💪 Sunday will be Reserved for Obfuscation Testing 🫡 Clocking out for TN

🔥176❤‍🔥3👍1🥰1

23 Feb 2026, 23:12 UTC≈2,310 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

CEO of Anthropic "Dario Amodei" Jan 2026: "I think I don't know we might be 6 - 12 months away from when the model is doing most maybe if all what Software Engineerers do end to end" Perhaps 😜 or ? https://youtu.be/Epp-Vz0FrPg

3👀1

22 Feb 2026, 18:38 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 8 August 2026

Be sure to Subscribe to the FakeVisitor Project channel, channel specifically focused on my current project

22 Feb 2026, 18:38 UTC888 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @FakeVisitPhoto

Logging System to Track Behavior of Application Communication between other or Self App. Control how Apps talk to other Apps, with ability to Block an from Communicating to a Service/Other App. More Control over Internal Inner App Process Communication, w Logging IPC Firewall, only System Server Level though

9🔥5

20 Feb 2026, 18:07 UTC≈1,720 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Hype, Hype, fact is they said around 2 years from 2023 A.I aka (LLMs) would replace 80% + of the work force, reality companies found it hard to replace their work force with (LLMs) and have Failed. CURL has shut down there but bounty program due to A.I Spam. Welcome to the Era of Slop Projects with Vulnerabilities and Spam P.Rs. This is just a few of the many issues brought upon the slop era . Never seek to Slopify

9🔥2😁2

19 Feb 2026, 00:54 UTC≈1,910 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

See FV Channel for this information ! https://t.me/FakeVisit

11🔥1

19 Feb 2026, 00:53 UTC≈1,820 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026

To clean this up, I use it, I don't mind people using it matter in fact I don't care though I would like to know if used if I am being dragged into something, and or even using something. It can do things faster, it can do a lot, still have major big limits that only prompts me to use it only for U.I but still is a nifty assistant at times. All this talk isn't to talk shit, if you seek this as talking shit, then be

🤮30🥰51🤣1😱1🙈1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @obbedupdates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 68,914 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Obbed” (@obbedupdates), 622 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obbedupdates.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.