Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FakeVisit

Channel

FakeVisit

@FakeVisit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

450subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003524799611
TypeChannel
Username@FakeVisit
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 19 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FakeVisit

Growth

4444504477 August 2026 — 444 subscribers8 August 2026 — 444 subscribers15 August 2026 — 450 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 443–451 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:56450+6
8 Aug 2026, 05:04444no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:31444first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 19 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

143 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7653.1%
🔥3222.4%
🥰149.79%
👏96.29%
❤‍🔥53.50%
🤓42.80%
👍32.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 01:58 UTC190 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @obbedupdatesFile

Check this Small easy Side Project I quickly Whipped up :D We got one more Side Project today, Evil Vector/LSposed (Dump Xposed Module Information such as what Java Methods are being Hooked, and What Values are Set for Results) coming Soon ! Note, you do not need this Project if you use the Official LSPosed, as they have a "Invalidate Inline Hooks" Feature built in, this would be more so useful for LSP Forks or Frida

14🤓4🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC369 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Current update though, we are finishing up the Authentication few more Tests , that's all I'll say I'm not the best with Times but I'll say just 2 Things working on and almost Finished

17👏7❤‍🔥2👍2

10 Jul 2026, 18:39 UTC369 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Virtual Camera Testing won't be available in First release but will be coming around second release, still has a way to go but concept shows ezpz no issue, Gotta support AIDL and HAL like DRM Module

🥰106🔥4

10 Jul 2026, 18:38 UTC365 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

16🔥3👏2

28 Feb 2026, 21:07 UTC≈3,150 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👍 Not bad Completed for Now, Since there can be many Broadcasts, it has its own Seperate Tab as well as (Boot Complete) Not bad 😎💪 Sunday will be Reserved for Obfuscation Testing 🫡 Clocking out for TN

22🔥4❤‍🔥3👍1

22 Feb 2026, 00:52 UTC≈6,850 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Logging System to Track Behavior of Application Communication between other or Self App. Control how Apps talk to other Apps, with ability to Block an from Communicating to a Service/Other App. More Control over Internal Inner App Process Communication, w Logging IPC Firewall, only System Server Level though

🔥201

19 Feb 2026, 02:08 UTC≈1,630 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Note the Key / Cert is for a Device your Device, for more Devices talk of that sort we can discuss big operations what not in DMs upon or near release. For now if you are OG and want your (+1) Spot drop it in the OG Channel in the Channel Above (OG Topic , not the General Chat)

🥰4

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @FakeVisit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 66,651 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FakeVisit” (@FakeVisit), 450 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FakeVisit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.