Channel
@nvsenling
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002383942082 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nvsenling |
| Description | 美女写真，日常分享 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nvsenling |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 31 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 31 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 May 2025 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤔 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢欧博百家乐 亚星百家乐 ... 📢月诗 📢美女诱惑|高冷御姐|性感... 📢欧博私网 欧博包杀 亚星... 📢处女 开苞 破处 📢马德里黑羽 📢玄子 📢福布斯平台 福布斯真人 ... 📢Dev.to开发者学习社... 📢奇怪的仙人掌|灵异|恐怖 📢丝足 足交 足控 📢世俱杯--体育电竞--欧... 📢环球360代理 环球36... 📢巨乳-大奶 📢天机推演 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢 TGFind🚀Telegram最高效的搜索平台！ 📢东南亚今日头条|新闻|爆料|悬赏|通缉|吃瓜缅甸妙瓦底大揭 📢 X-panel 一站式拉人增粉平台 📢 TeleTop 中文索引 📢⚽️注册送138🧧百家乐/棋牌/电竞体育信誉平台 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000+频道进行互推曝光，实现订阅快速增长。
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢八卦现场（娱乐大赏） 📢新盛公司开户--新盛会员... 📢神剧|古装|青春励志|一... 📢曼陀铃艺术之路 📢💕YoYo全国高端外围 📢体育 -电竞 -赛事-世... 📢BBC News 中文 📢美女|热舞|性感|热辣 📢抖音快手直播裸舞-头条-... 📢美食盘点|我是吃货|翻车... 📢菲律宾|越南女孩|高端外... 📢缅甸正规赌场线上赌博平台 📢AG百家乐-DB百家乐-... 📢老高與小茉 Mr & M... 📢办公室小野 Ms Yea... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢球速体育相信品牌的力量、老品牌值得信赖、不限ip、免实名。 📢💎85.CC电子百家乐0审核包出款支持汇旺提U 📢XX789🔞成人资源一站式导航 📢🅾️免费试玩✅大客必备✅注册送158🅾️ 🥇西湖娱乐城✅老品牌包出款✅出款超10亿U 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot…
来自Ton流量小助手推荐 📢文不叮清纯性感温柔美女 📢少女清純學生🔞蒐羅JK... 📢未来天空 📢女明星分享 📢禁忌公开|两性情事|渣男... 📢动态IP/静态IP-光速... 📢日本写真偶像集锦 📢国漫伍六一 📢槟城修车 槟城外围 槟城... 📢🅰️V故事汇🥷🏼 📢不严肃问题研究室👁 📢短剧|破解|免费看|歪嘴... 📢AV|女优|成人|高清 📢思维引力 📢TG看世界|杂谈|故事会 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢小夜数据🔥一手源头 📢在 Telegram 中拥有属于自己的商店，开启您伟大的事业。 📢 TeleTop 中文索引 📢官方收量🔥诚邀站长SEO流量大佬合作 📢蕾丝舞社官方频道 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000+频道进行互推曝光，实现订阅快速增长。
有個吃貨伴侶是什麼體驗
以為只是擦擦邊，沒想到實力不可小覷...
頭一次見二胡拉的這麽騷氣的
醫生一看就知道的秘密，真有這麽神嗎？
“有心者有所累，無心者無所謂”
瑜伽褲背後的秘密，她說對了嗎？
為什麼男朋友會反感“儀式感”，她說的對嗎？
為了免費肉串也是拼了！
這是表演給兒童節辛苦帶孩子的爸爸們看的吧！
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nvsenling. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 609,012 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nvsenling named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“女森林” (@nvsenling), 31 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nvsenling.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.