https://t.me/rtyivbnmij11

Channel
槟城修车 槟城外围 槟城上门
@Penangbincheng
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
218subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002840957044 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Penangbincheng |
| Description | #槟城修车 #槟城外围 #槟城上门 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Penangbincheng |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 218 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 218 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.459%
- avg views ÷ 218 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1.0
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,250
- Videos
- ≈556
- Links
- ≈619
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
近期因为有人冒充潇湘阁修车 新老客户有上当 我们修改了联系方式 尽量避免再被模仿 和 减少新老客户上当 😍 菲-泰-等..国 (助理) :@XXGE8 🥰 新-马-等..国(助理):@XXGE888 @lxl168 此号将慢慢不再接待 ⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ 近期有冒仿着 下单请认准 此频道联系人 助理 ❤️ 认 准 👆 ↑ 上方三个 ⚠️⚠️⚠️除此以外 都是假的
Nini 02 167 98 双一流研究生 可纯可御 开朗性格好 真🐻D 1-2小时 1次 5000马币 8小时2次 直✌️8500马币 10小时2次➕陪酒✌️9500马币 留下免上门费
艺名:喵喵C01 产地:越南🇻🇳 年纪:25 身高:165 体重:100 胸围:D真胸 是否有生育:无 是否会喝酒:会 是否会嗨:会 是否会服务:会 口爆,69是否可以:可以 45分钟1次 700 90分钟2次 1000 8小时4次 3000 上门+100 偏远另算
艺名:妮可T99 产地:福建 年纪:25 身高:170 体重:49 胸围:D真胸 是否有生育:无 是否会喝酒:会 是否会嗨:不会 是否会服务:会,无纹身,性格温柔,御姐 口爆,69是否可以:可以 45分钟 1次1800 90分钟 2次2700 8小时 4次6000
短期逗留 提前预约 其他照片视频 咨询经纪人 身高167。体重100斤。胸F 60分钟一次1500 90分钟二次2500 6 小时 小包夜5000 12小时大包夜8000
林一 170.50kg 真🐻模特艺术生 1-2小时 1次 5000马币 8小时2次 直✌️8500马币 10小时2次➕陪酒✌️9500马币 留下免上门费
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Penangbincheng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 636,539 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@aIGCArT · 401 post哎呀喂
@aiyawei1 · 251 post拜托了,小翔哥
@baituolexiaoxiangge · 271 post开云体育|百家乐电子棋牌 金沙飞投
@baogeli1221 · 591 post女子世界杯--2026年国际足联世界杯--欧洲杯
@fage88180 · 91 post风辰
@fengchen112 · 91 post全网搜资源搜索-学生-公益-网红秘密-赌场-百家乐棋牌
@hao44444bot · 91 post【荷花数据】源头dpi-sdk-国内外博彩
@hehuahaochoou · 201 post皇冠代理 皇冠体育 皇冠足球 皇冠开户
@huangguan0013 · 61 postUG环球平台 UG环球真人 环球平台 环球真人
@huanqiu3x · 61 post动画|搞笑|篮球🏀
@jiangxinlanqiu · 3171 post利博代理 利博百家乐 利博官网 万利代理
@libozx · 31 post利博百家乐 万利百家乐 UG环球百家乐 福布斯百家乐
@majiangfuzhu12 · 41 post皇冠招商 欧博招商 亚星招商 利博招商
@mmokfe · 61 post欧博网址 欧博注册 皇冠网址 皇冠注册
@oubo1j · 41 post环球360代理 环球360官网 线上百家乐 环球360私网
@oubo2022 · 8231 post欧博包赢 亚星包赢 欧博杀猪 亚星杀猪
@oubo3233 · 71 post台灣TW.zp🔞
@twzp666lld · 3031 post大膽科學 - What If Chinese
@WhatIfChinese · 1181 postPG娱乐/全球新平台/官方网站/真人百家乐
@xsyl16 · 561 post线上百家乐 欧博百家乐 亚星百家乐 利博百家乐
@yaxing11v · 41 postPG电子_麻将胡了_顶级博彩盘口
@yiyang002 · 71 post🔰云吞导航频道🔰
@YUNTUNDH · 101 post皇冠招商 欧博招商 亚星招商 利博招商
@zhongwenbaoma · 51 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“槟城修车 槟城外围 槟城上门” (@Penangbincheng), 218 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Penangbincheng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.