29 measurements spanning 30 days, net +1,146. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,950–27,449 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 22:36
27,269
-7
4 Sept 2026, 11:01
27,276
+31
3 Sept 2026, 02:16
27,245
+18
2 Sept 2026, 00:13
27,227
+47
1 Sept 2026, 01:38
27,180
+41
31 Aug 2026, 01:14
27,139
+33
29 Aug 2026, 21:57
27,106
+12
29 Aug 2026, 01:28
27,094
+19
27 Aug 2026, 22:44
27,075
+56
26 Aug 2026, 20:09
27,019
+60
25 Aug 2026, 23:04
26,959
+68
24 Aug 2026, 19:33
26,891
+204
23 Aug 2026, 05:24
26,687
+34
21 Aug 2026, 14:08
26,653
+25
20 Aug 2026, 13:14
26,628
+32
19 Aug 2026, 15:35
26,596
+55
18 Aug 2026, 16:26
26,541
+46
17 Aug 2026, 19:54
26,495
+73
16 Aug 2026, 19:47
26,422
+91
15 Aug 2026, 07:08
26,331
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.5%
avg views ÷ 27,269 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,680
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held
38 (31 July 2026 – 4 September 2026)
Views total
180,430
Reactions total
7,394
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 11s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,990 reactions across 38 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5221935403002515642
4,759
47.6%
custom 5454306851841658449
2,367
23.7%
custom 5282966682120242722
1,241
12.4%
custom 5255832002162087842
935
9.36%
custom 5264721652456902658
427
4.27%
custom 5327943210276776618
261
2.61%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,990 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 38 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nuanyn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 4 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
с утра после основного приема пищи съела эту углеводную бомбочку с чаем, просто безумно вкусно, как тортик 😭💔 идеально в день тренировки
ингредиенты:
🌫️белевская пастила с вишней 130г
🌫️ греческий йогурт — 130г
🌫️ какао-порошок дополнил
разделите пастилу на несколько пластов >> промажьте каждый слой йогуртом >> сложите пласты в тортик >> посыпьте сверху какао >> в холодильник на ночь
БЖУ // 15,6 г / 2,6 г / 90,5
сейчас нахаживала шаги и параллельно слушала лекцию с обучения. глобально нового узнаю не так много, но какие-то нюансы слышу с другого «угла», будто раньше присутствовал туман, а сейчас больше ясности. появляется желание снова разбирать в канале неоднозначные темы качалки / питания
еще вас стало тааак много и я не совсем понимаю уровень осведомленности моей аудитории. мне кажется, большинству хочется какого-то прос…
🌫️любимые, поздравляю под вечер всех с первым сентября!! <ЗЗ желаю легкого учебного года, а главное, чтобы нужные знания остались в голове надолго (а ненужное легче сдалось и забылось)
сегодня была только дистанционная лекция, на практические занятия уже иду завтра, вышел +- свободный день, успела сгонять на кардио и нашагать шаги
несмотря на временами напряжную учебу в меде, мне правда нравится то, чем я занимаюс…
вообще введу в курс дела о боте-конструкторе рациона, потому что давно не рассказывала о нем, хочу показывать процесс как он есть
если честно, мы не ожидали, что будет так сложно
как говорится, база любой работы: недооценить ее сложность 🤣 бот долгое время выдавал не очень корректное кбжу, а затем граммовку в рецептах
на картинках мы😇🥰
логика такая: бот составляет вам меню под ваше кбжу, чтобы вы смогли приготовит…
девчата, помните, мы с вами выбирали название для бота-конструктора рациона? мне понравилось название menuanyn / менюанюн (основное название на английском), вы что думаете? нравится?🥹 реакцию, если дааа
@evtushenkoo
@causewenevergooutofstyle, девчатам огромное спасибо, обе написали такое название (одно на русском, другое на англ), решила обеим подарить к боту бесплатный доступ на месяц, мы с вами свяжемся 🫶🌫️🌫️
на…
weekendsss
🌫️сходили с Ильей на паучка //
мой любимый персонаж кстааа
🌫️2 тренировки на пилоне
очень разгружают альтернативные виды активности, ощущаешь новизну и успеваешь соскучиться по залу! еще хочу похвастаться, действительно горжусь собой, последние два месяца тренируюсь максимально регулярно, не пропускаю ни одной силовой, так еще держу питание
наполнилась, пора воркать!
не люблю находить уход по принципу «собрала 15 банок и теперь пытаюсь понять, что с ними делать», стараюсь придерживаться минимализма во всем, поэтому посмотрела ETAT PUR и отметила для себя 3 продукта
🌟сыворотка с салициловой кислотой — хорошо подойдет, если кожа периодически выдает высыпания и есть склонность к забитым порам
🌞солнцезащитный флюид с минеральными уф-фильтрами — легкий вариант на каждый день, когда…
кардио-кардиоооо 🌫️🌫️
не могу сказать, что испытываю к нему ненависть, но не фанат. с моей бытовой активностью (реально низкой) два пути, чтобы поддерживать хорошую форму и не скатиться в увеличение жирового% :
1 // урезать калораж (не хочу)
2 // больше двигаться / гонять на кардио, если не могу нашагать шаги
выбрала второе, мне так легче, вообще, я бы с удовольствием гоняла на танцы (а не вот эта лестница ваша), н…
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @nuanyn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@nuanyn edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Златушка🍑 @babbiebuttt · 129,293 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АНЯ, ДЕЛАЙ БОЛЬШЕ * ੈ‧₊˚” (@nuanyn), 27,269 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nuanyn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
