Channel
@npenergy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
490subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001429402271 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @npenergy |
| Description | Официальный канал Центра компетенций НТИ при ИПХФ РАН по новым и мобильным источникам энергии |
| Created | 5 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/npenergy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 490 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 490 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (13 April 2026 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 840 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Центр компетенций НТИ ФИЦ ПХФ и МХ РАН выступил партнёром Летней инженерной школы «Инжир» — 2026 В 2026 году Центр компетенций НТИ «Новые и мобильные источники энергии» ФИЦ ПХФ и МХ РАН традиционно выступил партнёром Летней инженерной школы «Инжир». Летняя инженерная школа «Инжир» — ежегодный интенсивный образовательный проект для школьников и студентов, ориентированный на решение реальных инженерных задач. Школа …
👍2
ИНЖИР-2026: старт дан Сегодня студенты-финалисты проектно-образовательного интенсива ИНЖИР-2026, партнером которого вот уже четвертый год подряд стал наш Центр компетенций, начали свою работу на мероприятии. Наши сотрудники за время его работы прочитают ребятам немало образовательных и научно-популярных лекций, будут курировать решение кейса, который мы предоставили на ИНЖИР, судить финальные доклады, а 15 июля Цен…
ФИЦ ПХФ и МХ РАН принял участие в конференции по популяризации науки 23 июня на площадке РТУ МИРЭА состоялась конференция по популяризации науки, которая прошла под эгидой Министерства высшего образования и науки России. В конференции приняли участие пресс-секретари и сотрудники пресс-служб организаций, подведомственных Минобрнауки, которые приехали, чтобы обменяться опытом и послушать рассказы о лучших практиках. …
Вертолет на водородном топливе совершил полноценный испытательный полет Постепенно водородная авиация переходит от первых демонстрационных полетов к выполнению реальных задач. Сначала самолеты, потом дроны, а теперь очередь дошла и до вертолетов. 10 апреля в Канаде модифицированный вертолет Robinson R44 выполнил первый в мире пилотируемый полет по кругу на водородных топливных элементах. После завершения всего цикла…
28 и 29 апреля в Москве состоялся форум «Новые технологии энергетики: фабрика проектов», организованный Национальным нефтегазовым форумом при поддержке Министерства промышленности и торговли Российской Федерации. Мероприятие объединило ведущих специалистов отрасли, представителей научного сообщества и деловых кругов. В рамках форума руководитель Центра Алексей Левченко выступил с подробным докладом, посвященным разра…
❤1
Оксид железа вместо графита: новый подход к анодам литий-ионных аккумуляторов Химики из Южного федерального университета (Ростов-на-Дону) и ФИЦ проблем химической физики и медицинской химии РАН (Черноголовка) предложили улучшения свойств анодов литий-ионных аккумуляторов – заменой графита на наночастицы железосодержащего маггемита. При этом синтезировать маггемит микрофлюидным методом, который позволяет достаточно т…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @npenergy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 154,620 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Новые и мобильные источники энергии” (@npenergy), 490 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/npenergy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.