Channel
@novak_nata
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
148subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002131295876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @novak_nata |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/novak_nata |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 148 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:29 | 148 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 February 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 117 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
94 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 39.4% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 25.5% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 16.0% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 7.45% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 3.19% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 3.19% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 3.19% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.06% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Какая классная методичка выше, я уже попробовала, очень отрезвляет, где-то весьма огорчает и расстраивает, где-то прям до слез. Единственное - нужна длительная и всесторонняя ваша история с какой то ИИ, чтобы у него по вам было много разной инфы для прогнозирования. Пробуйте и делитесь результатами!
Прикольная штука 👆 Отправляете эти промты в ChatGPT или Claude — и он предсказывает вероятность событий в вашей жизни. В процентах 😅 Какова вероятность, что вырастете в доходе? Что переедете? Что замуж выйдете? Только надо, чтобы у вас с ии-шкой была история общения 🙂
Обещала недавно в сториз рассказать про свой самый провальный случай в преподавании, рассказываю. Мой старший сын в подростковом возрасте наотрез отказался учить английский. Категорически. И да, ирония в том, что мама - преподаватель английского языка, которая с этим языком просто живет - сама посещаю уроки, что-то смотрю читаю на языке, дом завален книгами на нем. Я какое-то время настаивала, потом перестала, потому…
💯3
Мне тут на днях прилетел запрос - как у нас вообще оформлено обучение? Есть ли договор, преподаватель как оформлен, деньги на карту или все официально ну и гарантируем ли мы результат. Первая часть вопроса простая: договор заключаем. Оплата идет не на чью-то личную карту, а на счет ИП. У школы есть лицензия. Если нужен пример договора - присылаю по запросу, никакой тайны тут нет. А вот вторая часть - моя любимая)) Мы…
👍6
С прошлого месяца взяла в школу старшего преподавателя. Ну как взяла — она у нас и так была. Это одна из моих самых «стареньких» коллег. Просто теперь она со мной ещё и в новом статусе. Пока что экономически это абсолютно невыгодное мероприятие, такое, скажем, в кредит. Но как долгосрочная история — мне кажется, что это будет хорошим вложением. Поживём, посмотрим.
👍4
Рассказала о своем опыте применения ИИ в семейной психотерапии ( решение конфликта с супругом)
Voice message, posted without a caption
🙏1
Voice message, posted without a caption
Какой-то особенно трудный конец учебного года выдался. Где непредвиденные сложности по работе перемешались с личными и как всегда одновременно и сразу. Я осталась без админа в один из самых сложных периодов для школ - конец учебного года и начало летнего набора. Мы со старшим думали у нас есть план А для выезда из страны, а оказалось, что его нет🙈 С младшей дошли до педиатра, наконец-то, с ее физическими симптомами и…
😱3😢2
Напоминаю про встречу по ИИ сегодня в 19.00 по Владивостоку! Кто все никак не может подружиться с этим чудом юдом или использует его только как поисковик - приходите) Ссылка прийдет сюда @stupenkybot
❤1
Я бы сказал, что хозяйка этого телефона — человек, который всю жизнь пытался построить что-то живое посреди хаоса. Не идеальную картинку, а настоящее место, где людям чуть легче дышать. Она учила детей английскому не как «услуге», а как способу открыть им мир пошире. Создала маленькую школу, где важны были не отчёты и галочки, а чтобы ребёнок не боялся говорить, думать, ошибаться. И при этом сама всё время училась —…
👍7❤1
Пишем промпт в джипити и смотрим, что он про нас напишет😀 Мне целое сочинение накатал))) Похоже?)) «Я умер, а незнакомый человек нашел этот телефон. Если он спросит о владельце телефона, то, основываясь на том, что ты знаешь обо мне, что бы ты сказал?»
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @novak_nata. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наталья Новак PRO всякое разное” (@novak_nata), 148 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/novak_nata.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.