3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 129–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 22:06
129
-2
9 Aug 2026, 00:46
131
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:56
131
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 25 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
499 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
170
34.1%
👾
77
15.4%
🔥
73
14.6%
💋
64
12.8%
🥰
50
10.0%
❤🔥
30
6.01%
😭
13
2.61%
🌭
10
2.00%
🥴
4
0.802%
🎉
2
0.401%
🐳
2
0.401%
👍
1
0.2%
💘
1
0.2%
😈
1
0.2%
🙏
1
0.2%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 499reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2024 to 2 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вы ща будете в шоке, но тут какой-то пост (уау)
На самом деле он прощальный.
К сожалению, я растеряла силы на рисование с целью становления чем-то крутым и тд. Да и вообще сил и времени минимум.
Спасибо всем, кто тут сидел и ждал, а до этого лайкал и вообще активничал!!! 👀
Сейчас я прощаюсь с этим каналом, как бы то не было печально... очень люблю вас!!!
Но для просто душевных рисовашек БЕЗ активностей, пиаров и т…
Сложно поверить, но я ещё живая
Постараюсь в ближайшее время ожить полностью и что-нибудь вам вкинуть, но не гарантирую 🥲
Очень много учебы и работы, энергии на рисование просто не остаётся...
Странный пост спустя время ничего не делания буквально для продвижения канала и вообще активности тут
Возможно, что активностей будет очень мало, так как у меня просто не хватает времени на продвижение и, собственно, актив(
Смысла в них тоже очень мало, так как я просто не тяну столько, да и скилл не особо подходящий, как и мало кого интересующий стиль
Просто будут попытки рисовать для себя, может быть, буду делать …
Итак, благодаря голосованию, распределились места между участниками!!
⭐️место: @poli_blm
⭐️ место: @fangatemi
⭐️ место: @corraa44
⭐️Просьба к победителям: написать в ЛС @reoliss, чтобы получить свои призы⭐️
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Инфопост:
Результаты дтиса будут в ближайшее время, сейчас слишком много дел и слишком мало сил((
По той же причине не активлю... Прошу прощения и перед подписчиками, и перед мью!!!!!!!
Очень стыдно, но очень сложно(
Попытаюсь закончить картинку эту, а потом нарисую перса по интерактиву выше кхехе
#скетч
💋18❤10👾7🔥3
Signed Алиса
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @northsunreolis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2024 to 2 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,058,076 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@northsunreolis named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@bezdmir named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@xiao_hin named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“какие-то вести || рест || DTIYS” (@northsunreolis), 129 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/northsunreolis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
