Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Белеме вещает | DTIYS

@poli_blm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

678subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001827870126
TypeChannel
Username@poli_blm
Created16 June 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/poli_blm

Growth

677678677.56 Aug 2026, 18:03 — 677 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:23 — 678 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:037 Aug 2026, 05:23
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 677–678 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 05:23678+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:03677first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.0%
avg views ÷ 678 subscribers
Avg views / post
427
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held16 (11 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total5,981
Reactions total825
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

942 reactions across 16 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 632807491264053431413013.8%
❤‍🔥11011.7%
custom 5397593277576785319859.02%
🍓859.02%
custom 5273927438114496812656.90%
custom 5782745792695505073626.58%
596.26%
💘525.52%
custom 5346102374953917782343.61%
custom 5791850539247472817313.29%
custom 5283093877576720166282.97%
custom 5372849949509712847282.97%
custom 5240251127827557930252.65%
🔥252.65%
242.55%
🥰212.23%
🐳202.12%
🕊151.59%
custom 5377641080017662850141.49%
😍131.38%
5 further kinds161.70%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 942reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 16 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @poli_blm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC242 views112 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🧡 Нин Гуан (Genshin Impact) Ручки languo: набор Warm yellow По правде говоря в этой работе я использовала не только этот набор ручек, поэтому под эту рубрику наверняка сделаю еще один арт в такой палитре, где уже точно будут использованы только они) #арт #Genshin_Impact #Ningguang

custom 527392743811449681265custom 632807491264053431421❤‍🔥134🔥4🍓2🤩2💘1

2 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC269 views69 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✨ Адопт-рыбка Акриловые маркеры, ручки languo Сделан для ивента-хуманизации. Я выбрала себе рыбу императорский ангел. И по итогам ивента сейчас проводится лотерея, где у вас есть шанс получить этого малютку, ну или кого-нибудь другого. #арт #адопт

❤‍🔥31🐳15custom 5377641080017662850144custom 63280749126405343144🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC280 views73 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Бинсу А5: акриловые маркеры Сделана на ивент-хуманизацию. Пока продать ее не удалось. Так что возможно сделаю ей чиби-версию и отправлю в новый пак. Может быть, так зайдет лучше. #арт #адопт

custom 539759327757678531932🍓18💘14custom 6328074912640534314521🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 21:30 UTC≈1,340 views58 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🤩Условия участия: • Подписка на Белеме вещает • Репост в тгк/3 пиар-чата (от 1000 участников) • По желанию поставить лайк на мои арты (мне будет приятно :3) 🤩Призы: 🤩 1500 руб. 🤩 1000 руб. 🤩 500 руб. 🤩Обязательно прочитайте правила в комментариях. Там же будут и арты с персонажем. • Если участников будет 5 и меньше, каждый участник получит утешительный приз 200 руб. • Если участников будет 20 и больше

custom 539759327757678531928custom 63280749126405343141512🔥3

27 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC402 views55 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 539759327757678531925❤‍🔥13custom 632807491264053431411🍓2💅21🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC291 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Продвигайте свои ивенты, а также узнавайте о самых свежих интерактивах тут💝 ✨✨🤩 @Zyhash_Interactive 🤩

🍓9🐳5

25 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC347 views68 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔯 Я покажу тебе звезды А5: акриловые маркеры Мы долго к этому шли, и, наконец, звезды сошлись. Сегодня я наконец встретилась со своим дорогим другом @ugolok_azumi. В честь этого нарисовала ей небольшой презентик с нашими маскотами. Мы обязательно увидимся снова, будь то в Москве, Анкаре или Копенгагене. #арт

custom 537284994950971284728🥰17🍓13custom 6328074912640534314422🎉2

23 Jul 2026, 20:48 UTC400 views59 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Нежный спойлер А фулл когда? А вот не скажу #арт

custom 528309387757672016628❤‍🔥14😍9💘3custom 63280749126405343143🍓2

21 Jul 2026, 23:51 UTC459 views67 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤍 Ночной город (палитра) А5: акрил Сделан на ивент палитру. Давно я не рисовала неоновые города, последний раз, если я правильно помню, я практиковала подобное в этой работе. Ну, и спойлер: скоро будет еще одна работа с такой тематикой. #арт

custom 579185053924747281731custom 632807491264053431417❤‍🔥132💘21🍓1

20 Jul 2026, 05:27 UTC372 views72 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Бинсу А5: акриловые маркеры, ручки languo Этот рисунок мне еще понадобится в дальнейшем для работы, которую я пока не могу показать вам. #арт

🍓3516custom 632807491264053431412❤‍🔥71custom 57827457926955050731

18 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC440 views63 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🐾 Лесной народ А5: акрил Осознала, что в последние полгода я делала крайне мало полноценок, что конечно не очень хорошо, ведь хочется развиваться. Поэтому буду стараться выкладываться на полную, из-за чего публикаций может стать меньше. Если нравится - 🎁 #арт

custom 57827457926955050733215🔥8🍓3😍2custom 63280749126405343142💘1

17 Jul 2026, 05:54 UTC407 views47 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Внезапная мадам А5: акриловые маркеры, гелевые ручки, распадающиеся чернила Возникло желание порисовать прошедшей ночью, и даже записать видео-процесс. Озвучки я к нему не делала, так что просто слушайте песенку. #арт

custom 632807491264053431424💘10custom 5296275952546893770921🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @poli_blm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 72,733 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Белеме вещает | DTIYS” (@poli_blm), 678 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poli_blm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.