Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

No fix here

@nofixhere

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

887subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002122677821
TypeChannel
Username@nofixhere
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nofixhere

Growth

8878 Aug 2026, 06:01 — 887 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:57 — 887 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:018 Aug 2026, 09:57
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 886–888 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:57887no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:01887first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

323 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14244.0%
🔥9429.1%
👍4614.2%
103.10%
🏆61.86%
😭41.24%
🙏41.24%
👌30.929%
👏30.929%
💯30.929%
🤯30.929%
❤‍🔥10.31%
😱10.31%
🤔10.31%
🤝10.31%
🤡10.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 323reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2024 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 18 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nofixhere. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 October 2024 to 17 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Jun 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,310 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

♨️Мы активно врываемся в ЛЕТО (опоздали на 5 дней) с новым курсом по архитектуре (системному дизайну)! 🚀 Ну как новым...курс изначально был частью продукта и распространялся только внутри моего сообщества, обучающихся системному анализу, как некие тайные знания, из уст в уста и на скрижалях. Но больше НЕТ СИЛ держаться Мы обкатали его на учениках и выяснили, что конверсия в офферы для сеньорских позиций подскочила

🔥6🤯32👍1💯1

9 May 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,740 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☠Аналитический путь☠ Достаточно частый вопрос, который мне задают до старта обучения - а что мы будем изучать и как это всё вместить в 3 месяца? Непонимание четкого пути достижения цели порождает страхи и закладывает зерно сомнения, что путь к успеху слишком далек от тебя Поскольку основная ценность ментора не в программе обучения и роадмапе, а в понимании процессов найма и потребностях рынка, то не вижу проблемы

10🔥7👍4

4 May 2026, 16:18 UTC≈1,270 views39 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❔И чё там по трудоустройству? Последние несколько месяцев слышу, буквально из всех щелей, информацию о том, что айти загнулось и больше не трудоустроиться Об этом говорят: 1️⃣ Опытные специалисты в больших айти каналах на 10к+ человек 2️⃣ Новички, которые не могут найти работу в течение полугода 3️⃣ На ютубе, в инстаграме (запрещенная на территории РФ организация), в тик-токах этих ваших... Буквально везде Однако,

🔥2012👍6👌1

17 Apr 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,360 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мой карьерный путь В голову пришла мысль, что наверное сложно довериться человеку в обучении, если совсем не знаешь его путь. ⬇️Давайте знакомиться⬇️ ❓Как было раньше (Раньше было лучше) Началась моя карьера с позиции инженера-конструктора на заводе по проектированию больших надводных кораблей (тот самый типичный заводчанин). Со временем стало понятно, что работа инженера достаточно скучная и рутинная и тяготит

49🔥14👍7👌1

29 Mar 2026, 12:14 UTC787 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnalystConsultPhoto

Сейчас достаточно часто можно услышать, что рынок стагнирует или вообще «мертв». Для тех, кто не умеет правильно презентовать себя на рынке и искать работу - это действительно может вызывать такие болезненные ощущения. Но результаты конкретно моего подхода к обучению и поиску работы говорят о другом. По крайней мере лично в нашем тесном кругу на 220 человек. 📈 По понятным причинам не раскрываю подробностей по компа

8🔥6👍2

7 Feb 2026, 13:36 UTC902 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnalystConsult

🔟 Может ли ИИ заменить в будущем профессию бизнес или системного аналитика? В основе работы аналитика лежит не просто сбор требований (переписать слова заказчика в блокнот), а именно выявление, что конкретно хочет заказчик, даже если он сам этого не осознает или не может точно сформулировать. 💡 Цель - не просто выполнить запрос, а попасть в потребность заказчика и его ожидания. ИИ, к сожалению или к счастью, может

🏆63👍2🔥2❤‍🔥1👌1🤝1

16 Jan 2026, 08:13 UTC730 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnalystConsultVideo

При выборе обучения мы хотим как можно удачнее вложиться в себя и максимально качественно оценить насколько эти вложения в свое образование окупятся 📢Ниже я раскрою вам ответы на те вопросы, которые волнуют вас больше всего при выборе обучения: 1️⃣Сколько в среднем длится поиск работы после окончания курса? - Срок поиска первой работы в среднем составляет 1–2 месяца после активного старта собеседований. - Рекорд с

🔥54👍2

19 Dec 2025, 19:06 UTC702 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

3👍2🔥2

19 Dec 2025, 19:04 UTC≈1,490 views14 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#бэтмен #анализ #IT 🦇 Этому городу нужен новый микросервис 🦇 Микросервисная архитектура… Это не просто подход. Это дисциплина. Дисциплина – это всё. Я видел системы... огромные, как Киллер Крок . Медленные. Неповоротливые. Одна уязвимость — и всё падает. Как карточный домик на окраине, выложенный из карт Джокера. Твой монолит — как единый костюм без модулей. Уязвим. Негибок. Мы разбиваем его. На обособленные микр

8🔥3💯2👏1

7 Nov 2025, 11:28 UTC≈1,710 views17 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2IaA-nVxhc&t=952s

🔥94👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nofixhere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 840,014 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“No fix here” (@nofixhere), 887 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nofixhere.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.