Channel
@nocommentsstories
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,891subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001243169002 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nocommentsstories |
| Created | 12 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nocommentsstories |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 2,891 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 2,896 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 2,897 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 2,897 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
130 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 32 | 24.6% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 20.8% | |
| 💯 | 22 | 16.9% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 15.4% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 9.23% | |
| 🥴 | 6 | 4.62% | |
| 🤷♂ | 4 | 3.08% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 2.31% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 1.54% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.769% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.769% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2022 to 13 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Когда-то я искала мужа, а теперь ищу няню для своего ребенка. В принципе пока квест все с тем же хэштегом #гдетыихберешь А где вы ищите хороших людей в Минске?🙂 А историями поделилась на канале https://t.me/promaterinstvobezprikras/59
🔥12
Немного про отношения захотелось репостнуть. А вы как думаете?
👍26💯22💩2❤1👏1
Long time no see Во-первых, давно не виделись! А тем временем те, кто долго искали любовь, возможно, уже стали мамами )) А тут такой небольшой проект в соавторстве намечается. На днях открыла и парочку своих заметок в стол. Это же лучшая психотерапии. Работает на 💯. Как говорит моя подруга: «Захотел проораться, написал пост и как-то сразу полегчало». А детки растут и радуют мам. Моей сегодня 2,5, кстати. В общем…
❤9🥴6👍1
Из жизни нейросетей
😁27🤷♂4🤯3🤬1
Забавный рассказ о свидании ресторане, не теряет актуальность с ходом времени ) https://teletype.in/@alekstories/UumGG425DqJ
❤8
Посмотрела Барби. Давно я не была так озадачена фильмом… Весь сеанс сгорала от кринжа, и меня не покидало ощущение, что король-то голый, но все боятся об этом сказать вслух. За красивой картинкой не скрывалось примерно нихуя – настолько жидкие идеи, непроработанные линии, лицемерная игра на повестке. Такое ощущение, что авторы сами запутались, где жирно троллят патриархат и капитализм, а где пытаются донести какие-то…
👍4
Новости, так сказать Первый чемпионат Европы по сексу состоится в Швеции. Швеция первой зарегистрировала секс как вид спорта и решила устроить турнир. Он состоится в Гетеборге 8 июня 2023 года. Участие примут 20 представителей из разных стран Европы. Чемпионат продлится несколько недель, а соревнования будут ежедневно по 6 часов. Будет 16 дисциплин, в которых участники будут набирать очки. Среди них: проникновение…
Скажем, что познакомились в библиотеке Так часто пишут в Тиндере парни, которые считают, что у них классное чувство юмора (на самом деле, нет). Очень скоро этим диванным стендаперам действительно придется знакомиться в библиотеке и местах не столь отдаленных, потому что Тиндер в России – всё. В приложении началась финальная ликвидация: все, кто сидел здесь годами, лениво пописывая «чё как?» и бесцельно разминая больш…
❤2
Про классику Потянуло меня на классическую литературу. Решила выровнять баланс: меньше соц сетей, больше времени на чтение 📖 Только что завершила книгу "Униженные и оскорбленные". Читала и дивилась, как такое может быть) Забавные истории любви, мне кажется такого сейчас не бывает. Такие странные надуманные проблемы в отношениях...Гордость красной линией в ущерб всему. Но книга остается современной. Истории разных …
Смотришь на жуткие кадры из Турции, как же хрупко человеческое благополучие. Как легко все рушится. И какое же безумие, когда люди устраивают такое сами, намеренно. Руины - трагедия и руины - преступление, в ленте вперемежку. Сил всем.
По себе знаю, как сложно и страшно начать новую главу в жизни. При этом, если задуматься, страшнее не начать. Мы все умрем - в этом ни у кого нет никаких сомнений, гарантия 100%. Вероятность облажаться же значительно ниже - всего лишь 50/50:) Пока мы думаем, что мы еще все успеем, что все еще впереди, и ничего не меняем, мы просто медленно, но верно, приближаемся к неизбежному финалу. Если это приближение наполнен…
И давайте о позитивном. О чем мечтаете в новом году
The shares total 255%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nocommentsstories. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
И давайте о позитивном. О чем мечтаете в новом году
The shares total 255%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вы боитесь следующего года?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что выберете на романтик вечер?
The shares total 174%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2022 to 13 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,170,892 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#гдетыихберешь” (@nocommentsstories), 2,891 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nocommentsstories.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.