Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

no consensus yet | Alex Alekhin

@no_consensus_yet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

62subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003042949672
TypeChannel
Username@no_consensus_yet
DescriptionЛогирую мысли, идеи и наблюдения. В основном про технологии и crypto. tg: @alexalekhineth
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/no_consensus_yet

Growth

627 August 2026 — 62 subscribers10 August 2026 — 62 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:1662no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:3862first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
22
Videos
2
Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

261 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7227.6%
7026.8%
👍3513.4%
👀207.66%
❤‍🔥114.21%
💯103.83%
🤓103.83%
🤔62.30%
🤩62.30%
😁41.53%
🥰41.53%
🆒31.15%
🕊20.766%
😱20.766%
🤯20.766%
🏆10.383%
👏10.383%
🙏10.383%
🤝10.383%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 December 2025 to 12 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 May 2026, 17:33 UTC158 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Очень полезное интервью: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iU1TY30dmI P.s. Медийная деятельность Оскара Хартмана - это лучшее, что могло случиться с предпринимательством в русскоязычном сегменте

👍4👀32

29 Mar 2026, 20:20 UTC253 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Потихоньку пробираюсь через такты по выходным. Теперь точно уверен, что осилю. Глаза боятся, руки делают..

8🔥6❤‍🔥1🕊1🤩1

10 Mar 2026, 20:41 UTC300 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Только что прошла вторая лекция в Академии Внешней Торговли. Обсуждали стандарты токенов: 1) ERC-20 2) ERC-721 3) ERC-1400 4) ERC-3643 Если вам интересно разобраться в архитектуре, а также понять потенциальное применение разных стандартов, то будет полезно посмотреть. Ссылка на запись: https://disk.yandex.ru/d/ky_J6IVi9wamjQ Презентация в приложении. P.s. Вопросы, на которые обещал ответить, загружу в Q&A в то

9🔥4🏆1👍1

8 Mar 2026, 19:13 UTC221 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Во вторник прошла первая лекция. Она была посвящена основам технологии блокчейн. Вот дошли руки написать😬 Тут ссылка на всю папку с материалами и видео: https://disk.yandex.ru/d/oD4Fm7EuKfTERw Вопросы, которые прозвучали по теме лекции, сгружу в Q&A папку. Пока из самых важных: 1) Что такое протокол? 2) Что такое консенсус? P.s. Если хотите что-то узнать по этой теме, смело пишите в комменты (или лс, если стесняе

9👀2🔥2

2 Mar 2026, 18:24 UTC239 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Завтра читаю лекции в Академии Внешней Торговли. Когда-то давно мы с @k_ikonostasov начинали делать курс, но тогда мир его так и не увидел. Сейчас адаптирую его в академический формат. Материалы: 1) Лекция №1 - Матчасть 2) Лекция №2 - Криптоактивы и стандарты Доп. материалы (что такое хэширование, приватный ключ, адрес): 1) Презентация 2) Вот тут будут все видео c разъяснениями Буду постепенно докручивать презент

13🔥4

28 Feb 2026, 17:25 UTC176 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я не могу перестать слушать это: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_Klu8YTub8&list=RDn_Klu8YTub8&start_radio=1 Попробую выучить

3👀3😱2

27 Feb 2026, 16:36 UTC257 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Все, выдохнул. Конечно, пока еще тяжело про что-то сложное говорить на английском (особенно про консенсус Ethereum🤪), но вопрос количества подобных выступлений. Спасибо @cyberwider за пушинг в этом направлении. Слайды по сегодняшней презентации: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/144XghJFvF0aoKdfF0sJXV2qVF4vkJkDDW-mVXQzvj-w/edit?usp=sharing Кому интересно, задавайте вопросы, обсудим⚡️

🔥14👍2👏1

25 Feb 2026, 21:13 UTC165 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

⚡В эту пятницу (27.02) выступаю на онлайн-ивенте Вот ссылка: https://luma.com/b97meitp Лекция посвящена сравнению сетей Ethereum и Solana по разным критериям (экономическим и техническим). Кажется, презентация получилась насыщенной. Регистрируйтесь, буду рад всех видеть🤗

🔥9👀3👍3

19 Feb 2026, 17:37 UTC166 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥104🥰4🕊1🙏1

19 Feb 2026, 17:35 UTC161 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

2026 год будет посвящен внедрению и осмыслению искусства маленьких шагов. Казалось, что на интересные/важные грани жизни нет времени. Но это все вредный самообман. Если чего-то не хватает, то именно дисциплины. Плюсы: процесс легко измерим. В музыке тактами, в спорте секундами/повторениями, в работе деньгами и.т.д. Минусы: чтобы внедрять дисциплинированность, нужно быть дисциплинированным. Какие-то шажочки будут

👍6👀4💯4

31 Jan 2026, 12:56 UTC190 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

💧Блокчейн Sui: общие мысли про консенсус Несмотря на то, что в деталях работа Ethereum, BNB, Solana отличается, есть одно общее свойство - блоки в таких блокчейнах генерируются линейно друг за другом. И по сути, мы всегда знаем, что "в такой-то временной слот такой-то валидатор должен сформировать блок и распространить его в сеть, если не сделает - заберем у него часть залога, чтобы раздуплился и пришел в тонус".

🤓5🔥4👍2

30 Jan 2026, 16:34 UTC139 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Несколько топовых сетей использует DAG-консенсус под капотом (Sui, Avalanche, Aptos, Sonic и др.). Но при детальном рассмотрении оказывается, что это не какой-то там один концепт, а целый класс (я бы сказал зоопарк, где Sui - лев 🦁) абсолютно разных реализаций. Очень крутой метаобзор на DAG-системы подобного рода: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.06128 P.s. Я начал смотреть на Sui чуть более внимательно, даже вроде разо

👍74🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @no_consensus_yet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 848,066 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“no consensus yet | Alex Alekhin” (@no_consensus_yet), 62 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/no_consensus_yet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.