Channel
@nia_beads
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003317090968 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nia_beads |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 28 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nia_beads |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 17 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 16 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 16 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 28 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
77 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 76.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 7.79% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 7.79% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 7.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Мне так нравится вайбик этой фотки🌟 Как только попала в тест, сразу появилось желание сделать его нежным, в сером и белом цвете☺️ Сплела достаточно быстро, но тянула с плетением из-за подготовки к экзаменам😴 Спасибки, что взяла в тест на такую милоту, @Vladonyka, была рада протестировать😘
❤3💘2🔥1
Доплела куколку🥺 Начинала плести еще вроде в начале мая, ооочень долго не могла определиться с цветом платья, но решила, что зелёный будет лучше всего🩷 Спасибо, Блуми, за тест🩷
🔥3❤2
Ещё не проснулась, в голову текст не лезет😇 Но мне очень нравится этот пёсик😙 Доделала вчера вечером, он не сильно большой и быстро сплелся Мась, большое спасибо за тест, была рада помочь🤭
❤3🔥1
Как же я балдею с этой лягухи💕 Она вышла прям крупненькой и в процессе уже решила, что хочу ее сделать в 3 оттенках 🐈⬛ Плела на тест для Маши, спасибо большое что взяла🤍
❤4❤🔥1
О да, я начинаю вылазить с выгорания Плела этого милашку на тест для @evqlla, спасибо за доверие💗☺️ Хотела сделать его сначала бежевым/коричневым, как реального мишку, но попался на глаза этот цвет и как раз хватило🥹
❤3🔥1
Ровно в полночь закончила доплетать ее😈 Очень необычная кошечка получилась, окрас с голубым придумался сам собой и я довольна как вышло Со стороны спины есть серые мини-пятнышки, на рысь похоже, но сейчас не могу сфоткать🥲 Ну, а плела в тест для любимой Блуми, большое спасибо за доверие💗
❤5💘1
Вновь немного отвлекаюсь от плетения тестов☺️ На самом деле, я кайфую когда их много, просто решила отдохнуть😇 Захотелось поучаствовать в марафоне на Крошика от @alinochkarr_art, нарисовала достаточно быстро, туториал мега понятный был💗🌸 А завтра снова берусь за плетение
❤3
Дошли руки до этой лапули🥹 Безумно понравилось плести, решила его сделать из матового зелёного и не пожалела Плела на тест для @kamabiser, спасибо большое за доверие💗
❤4💘1
Немного вчера отвлеклась от тестов, т.к хотела сделать подарочек для бабули на день рождения ☺️♡ Сплела очень быстро, сама не ожидала Автор схемки: @Beads_li 💗
❤5
Ещё один тестик☺️ Сделала эту малютку очень быстро Изначально думала сделать пингвинчика чёрным, но пакет с этим бисером где-то испарился🥲 нашла только на реснички) но мне нравится как вышло☺️ Тестик от @biserbeadssh, спасибо большое 💋💋
❤3
Иии я нашла силы и настроение доделать большую ламу, наконец-то 🙃 Теперь есть мама и дочка☺️ Ооочень была рада поучаствовать в тесте на этих красавиц @Masha_rykodelki, спасибки💋💋
❤3💘1
Иии, наконец-то закончила эту красоту💗 Автор зайчика - @beads_linpi спасибо огромное за тест и доверие☺️
❤🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @nia_beads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,044,277 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nia_beads named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“nia☕️” (@nia_beads), 17 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nia_beads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.