Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

невежда

@newezha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

224subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001419658710
TypeChannel
Username@newezha
Created5 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/newezha

Growth

223224223.56 August 2026 — 223 subscribers7 August 2026 — 223 subscribers13 August 2026 — 224 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 223–224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:38224+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:03223no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:16223first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.1%
avg views ÷ 224 subscribers
Avg views / post
153
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (19 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,899
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1539.5%
😁1128.9%
🔥410.5%
👀25.26%
💯25.26%
🗿25.26%
🤨12.63%
🥰12.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чудовищные новости для моей жены, которая нашла фильм «I saw the TV glow» скучным и претенциозным (это лучший фильм в истории человечества)

1

5 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC100 viewsread 7 August 2026

Под гнетом социального стыда, Под звуки нестареющего вальса…

4 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC111 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Моя новая гиперфиксация — подкаст Chapo Trap House. Невероятно злые левые люди, сосредоточенные на ненависти к окружающей политике, они достигают пика, когда обозревают медиа, которое им чудовищно не нравится. Обзоры на фильмы Captain Vigilante и/или Ladyballers — храни вас бог, если вы не знаете, что это за фильмы — это золото, но ещё большее золото — их девятилетней давности обзор на сериал "Newsroom / Отдел новос

1

4 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC107 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Елена Борщева готовит стендап-концерт. А что готовит Елена Стендапова-Концертова я даже говорить не буду, сами догадаетесь

😁7🥰1

3 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC117 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы вообще мало говорим о том, насколько Максим Малевич похож на молодого Дэвида Боуи. И, уверен, будь в юности Боуи столько компьютеров — он бы тоже ими всю комнату заставил.

3 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC115 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

shoutout to one of my favorite genders: белые мужчины, которые издеваются и ебут тебе мозги Гейб Казилло (создатель ape out, игры, где ты обезьяна, сбегающая из тюрьмы под джазовую музыку, подстраивающуюся под твои движения) и Беннетт Фодди (человек, в честь которого БУКВАЛЬНО назвали жанр видеоигр) пришли в гости к IGN. чем они пришли заниматься? ебать IGN мозги. дело в том, что у IGN есть такой формат — геймдев

👀2🤨1😁1

3 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC116 viewsread 7 August 2026

сложно осознать трек sp4k — самара лет 10 назад Полина Н. (тогда К.), главредка "бигвилладжа", форсила понятие "волжский гедонизм" лет 15 назад она же (и Кирюша Ч.) познакомили меня с книгами Эрленда Лу "Наивно. Супер" и "Допплер" — страдающий от мегаполиса и лейт-стейдж капитализма человек пытается жить простую мысль и говорит о своих бедах просто, понятно, по-людски. вижу в этом некоторую параллель, которую можн

30 Jul 2026, 23:06 UTC172 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Выдающийся альбом Славы КПСС, в котором он снова продемонстрировал свои лучшие стороны — смешные барсы, умение подстраиваться под абсолютно все стили во вселенной, и, конечно же, грустный трек в конце — буду думать, что это посвящение уехавшему в Берлин Андрею Андреевичу В последнем выпуске ЛПНЛ Артём Моргунов вспоминает свою бытность "поэта без усов", и, конечно, я погрузился в воспоминания вместе с ним — если аль

3

30 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC164 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У российских политиков, нейросетей и половины айтишников одна и та же проблема — невозможность ответить на любой вопрос фразой «Честно говоря, я не знаю». Собственно, Леонид Волков принадлежит ко всем трём категориям, потому иногда получаются такие вот чудеса https://t.me/micromedia666/59893

💯2

30 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC158 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Поделюсь старым текстом про Мастера и Маргариту, раз уж он выходит в зарубежный прокат. Не уверен, что что-то из этого можно перевести — вся ирония и отчаяние, заключенные в использовании Кантором западного киноязыка, едва ли будут понятны западным зрителем без дополнительного контекста. Не говоря уж о финальных трех минутах, которые очень страшные, и при этом очень предвосхитили всех этих последних Колобков богатыр

1

29 Jul 2026, 22:20 UTC139 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

— Шо за идея с конём? — Мы планировали спрятаться в деревянном коне и подарить его вам — В рамках договорняка? — Да. — Но не вышло договорняка — Ну да... Агамемнон был в ярости, когда мы послали грифонов на Микены. — Это когда мы сожгли вам Агору? — И склады с греческим огнём. — Шо-то ваши же боги не покровительствуют вам совсем. — А я не знаю... Гермес отключил нам связь с Олимпом. Троянские молитвы проходят, а греч

🔥1😁1

28 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC131 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @apolloniaVideo

ВСТРЕЧАЯ ВОЙНУ БЕЗ ТЕБЯ | перформанс в восьми письмах; премьера 10 августа https://vlsv.gay/wwy

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @newezha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 332,438 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“невежда” (@newezha), 224 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newezha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.