5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,844–3,860 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 08:13
3,847
+1
9 Aug 2026, 14:16
3,846
-8
6 Aug 2026, 12:40
3,854
-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:22
3,858
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:30
3,858
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.40%
avg views ÷ 3,847 subscribers
Avg views / post
285
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
21 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
5,978
Reactions total
279
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
139 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
44
31.7%
👍
32
23.0%
🔥
28
20.1%
🥰
15
10.8%
❤🔥
6
4.32%
🙏
4
2.88%
🤡
4
2.88%
😢
3
2.16%
👏
2
1.44%
👾
1
0.719%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Оставить все как есть — олимпиады должны давать такие преимущества15%
Ограничить число мест, которые занимают олимпиадники33%
Ввести отдельные квоты: отдельно для олимпиадников, отдельно для поступающих по ЕГЭ35%
Олимпиадники тоже должны подтверждать знания ЕГЭ не ниже определенного порога31%
Увеличить количество бюджетных мест в топовых вузах31%
Пересмотреть систему олимпиад и льгот — она нуждается в реформе40%
Ограничить количество мест для поступающих на целевое и по льготным квотам21%
Другое (напишу в комментариях)2%
The shares total 208%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🎓 Кто должен получать бюджетные места: стобалльники или олимпиадники?
В новостях одна за другой появляются истории абитуриентов, которые набрали 300 и даже 310 баллов (с учетом индивидуальных достижений), но не смогли пройти на бюджет в ведущие университеты.
▪️ Причина — значительная часть бюджетных мест заполняется победителями и призерами олимпиад, поступающими без вступительных испытаний или с особыми преимущест…
Сегодня в рубрике «Культурный четверг НОВОЙ ЭРЫ» — подборка Терезы Плетневой, студентки факультета политологии МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова.
👀 КНИГИ
🟣 «Братья Карамазовы», Ф.М. Достоевский
Вечная классика. Последний роман великого писателя, в котором виден итог всех ключевых идей предыдущих работ. Философия выбора и психологически давящий реализм проскальзывают сквозь весь сюжет, что оставляет осадок читателю для дальн…
🤔Где приобрести журнал ОТТИСК?
Первый номер журнала всегда исключителен, с него начинается история издания и формируется его интеллектуальный и визуальный язык. Первый номер «Ценности: теория и практика» вышел ограниченным тиражом, его приобретение — возможность сохранить первый «оттиск» журнала в своей коллекции, с которого началась большая история. ОТТИСК уже представлен на книжных полках в магазинах:
📌«Москва»
М…
💬 Собрали для вас цитаты наших экспертов по международным отношениям, технологическому прогрессу и внутренней политике России.
❗️ Все они были опубликованы, среди прочих, в следующих СМИ:
🌟 Свободная Пресса;
🌟 vesti.ru.
А также звучали в двух выпусках радиопрограммы «Сигналы точного времени» и были опубликованы в нашем канале «НОВАЯ ЭРА. Позиция».
Читайте мнения Егора Зубакина, Вадима Амелина, Артура Богачёва и Ек…
💉 От Sputnik V до вакцины против рака: следующий шаг центра Гамалеи
Многие знают НИЦЭМ имени Гамалеи как создателя «Спутника V» — той самой вакцины от COVID-19, с которой все начиналось несколько лет назад. Но с тех пор команда центра переключила свои мРНК-технологии на куда более сложную задачу — рак.
Сначала появилась «Неоонковак» — персонализированная вакцина от меланомы, которую весной этого года впервые ввели …
🔥 ЭКСКУРСИЯ ПО БАСМАННОМУ РАЙОНУ
«НОВАЯ ЭРА» отправляется изучать Басманный район — один из старейших и контрастных уголков Москвы.
Здесь бывшие дворцовые слободы, купеческие усадьбы, изящное барокко и авангардные инженерные решения прошлых веков органично соседствуют с современной городской средой.
На экскурсии узнаем:
🟣 как возникло название Басманного района и какие слободы существовали здесь в эпоху Московског…
💊 Госпожа Пенициллин: как советский «грибок» спас страну
Представьте сталинградский подвал 1942 года. Вокруг — гул бомбежки и стоны раненых, умирающих не столько от пуль, сколько от сепсиса и гангрены. В этом аду работает хрупкая женщина в белом халате. В руках у нее не винтовка, а чашка Петри с плесенью. Это Зинаида Виссарионовна Ермольева, человек, подаривший жизнь сотням тысяч советских солдат и создавший отечест…
ВРЕМЯ МЕНЯТЬ СУДЬБЫ: НОВЫЙ СЕЗОН ПРОГРАММЫ НАСТАВНИЧЕСТВА
Каждый профессионал в свое время начинал с первого неуверенного шага. И почти за каждым из них стоял тот, кто вовремя смог дать необходимый совет.
Совсем скоро у нас стартует новый поток ПРОГРАММЫ НАСТАВНИЧЕСТВА, поэтому мы ищем тех, кто готов стать маяком для нового поколения специалистов.
🤍 Присоединяйтесь к программе в качестве Наставника, если вы хотите…
Даешь Сириус в Казахстане!
❗️О роли образовательной инфраструктуры по модели Сириуса, создаваемой в Астане и Алматы, президент Республики Казахстан Касым Жомарт Токаев рассказал во время встречи с Президентом России Владимиром Путиным на Форуме межрегионального сотрудничества России и Казахстана в Омске.
🗣Президенты двух стран обсудили развитие научных, гуманитарных и экономических связей. При этом они отметили нео…
💞 О всем хорошем, что случилось на прошлой неделе
🤩 Вакцина от рака уже не за горами
Ученые НИЦЭМ имени Гамалеи разработали прототип вакцины от немелкоклеточного рака легких, сообщил научный руководитель центра, академик РАН Александр Гинцбург.
🤩 Сериал о российских ученых
МГУ совместно с Институтом развития интернета запускает анимационный сериал из восьми эпизодов, посвященный выдающимся российским ученым, чьи от…
❤4👍4🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @neweraspace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Оставить все как есть — олимпиады должны давать такие преимущества15%
Ограничить число мест, которые занимают олимпиадники33%
Ввести отдельные квоты: отдельно для олимпиадников, отдельно для поступающих по ЕГЭ35%
Олимпиадники тоже должны подтверждать знания ЕГЭ не ниже определенного порога31%
Увеличить количество бюджетных мест в топовых вузах31%
Пересмотреть систему олимпиад и льгот — она нуждается в реформе40%
Ограничить количество мест для поступающих на целевое и по льготным квотам21%
Другое (напишу в комментариях)2%
The shares total 208%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 13,952 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@neweraspace named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@fp_msu named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НОВАЯ ЭРА” (@neweraspace), 3,847 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neweraspace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.