Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Несу разные мысли 💭

@nesuraznye

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

263subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002195914890
TypeChannel
Username@nesuraznye
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nesuraznye

Growth

263264263.57 August 2026 — 264 subscribers8 August 2026 — 264 subscribers14 August 2026 — 263 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 263–264 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:04263-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:03264no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:55264first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 16s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

441 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥17038.5%
10523.8%
😁7015.9%
👍296.58%
👾81.81%
😍81.81%
🤩71.59%
🎉61.36%
💅51.13%
👏40.907%
🙏40.907%
🤡40.907%
🥰40.907%
🥴40.907%
🫡40.907%
😢30.68%
🤯20.454%
🍓10.227%
💘10.227%
💯10.227%
1 further kind10.227%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 441reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2025 to 21 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nesuraznye. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2025 to 21 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Oct 2025, 17:05 UTC647 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁15🙏4

Signed Misha Kirichenko

14 Oct 2025, 16:28 UTC772 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

шрифт Брайля на сайте в версии для слабовидящих — это, конечно, сильно

😁21🥴4

Signed Misha Kirichenko

6 Oct 2025, 16:17 UTC802 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Начал пользоваться браузером Comet Сначала была реакция: дикий восторг, ничесе он умеет. Подумал научу сценарию оставления отзыва. Для этого нужно кликнуть на звезды, чтобы появилось поле ввода отзыва. Я убил 3 часа, чтобы научить его «распознавать звезды». Не получилось. Поэтому я сейчас на стадии отрицания. Все равно даю шанс и пробую другие сценарии. Еще не до всех дошел. Пока короткий вывод: он умеет что-то про

🔥15👍2🤩2

Signed Misha Kirichenko

2 Sept 2025, 18:56 UTC849 views39 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ура. Мы сделали рейтинги. Теперь можно стать легендой любимых мест ⭐️ Первыми делаем виток в развитии рынка — идем в прямые коммуникации с гостем. Дальше — больше. На этом точно не остановимся. Было очень сложно, но дотащили Все, пока 👋

🔥307👍1😍1

Signed Misha Kirichenko

22 Aug 2025, 19:27 UTC866 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

GPT-5 придумал новое доказательство Недавно GPT-5-pro справился с задачей из области выпуклой оптимизации, которая до этого оставалась нерешённой. Модель смогла придумать собственное доказательство и улучшила известную границу (до 1.5/L). Суть задачи найти минимумы у функций «правильной формы» (не берите в голову). Там часто применяют так называемые итеративные числительные методы: на каждом шаге алгоритм делает пр

14🔥9

Signed Misha Kirichenko

13 Aug 2025, 16:44 UTC≈1,510 views33 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ура, это случилось! Вышел на свет Neviju Классическая схема. Мы явно видим инцидент на проде, копаемся в логах и не понимаем, что пошло не так. Главное при решении проблемы — научиться ее воспроизводить. И вот тут начинаются танцы с бубнами. Сидишь сутками, строишь гипотезы и в итоге сдаешься от недостатка сил. Каждый раз я приходил к мысли «эх, как было бы здорово увидеть, что было на экране». Вебвизор Метрики не

20🔥8👍5

Signed Misha Kirichenko

5 Aug 2025, 17:58 UTC≈1,410 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Крах найма в IT. Советую почитать. Короткий вывод: теперь требуем у кандидатов xml версию трудовой, так как ее нельзя подделать и можно проверить на достоверность. А. Ну и конечно. Идем в оффлайн собесы. Все по старинке.

👍8🫡4😢3🤡2😱1

Signed Misha Kirichenko

16 Jul 2025, 16:27 UTC≈1,300 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Добавили Copilot Code Review. Пока полет нормальный. Он действительно умеет находить логические несостыковки в повествовательной нити кода и условиях. Подмечает узкие места, даёт рекомендации. У команды пока только положительные отзывы (или мне не приносили негативные). Есть вещи, которые мы точно бы поймали в тесте, но здорово, что копайлот помогает найти такое раньше. Это не человек — глаз у него не замылен. Пок

9🔥8👍3🤡1

Signed Misha Kirichenko

8 Jul 2025, 18:43 UTC≈1,070 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @it_gonzalesPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁18🥰41💯1🔥1

Signed Misha Kirichenko

1 Jul 2025, 16:54 UTC≈1,210 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я — CTO нетмонет Для меня это очень волнительный и ответственный момент. Но в то же время — большие возможности. Я точно понимаю: главное в IT-компании — это люди. А с этим мне повезло! В нетмонет сильная команда, мотивированная на результат и дорожащая им. А значит, мне будет проще помогать достигать поставленных целей. У меня куча идей. Буду аккуратно их «продавать» и продвигать. Как только увижу горящие глаза в

35🔥22👾8🎉6

Signed Misha Kirichenko

22 Jun 2025, 09:12 UTC≈1,290 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Когда создавал телеграм-канал, то собрал, кажется, все возможные ошибки. Подсвечу некоторые из них, чтобы вам было проще решиться. 1. Включите реакции и комментарии чтобы понимать как заходит/не заходит ваш контент. 2. Не пишите длинные посты. Даже если кажется, что тут все по делу и ничего не сократить — все равно не надо. Лучше тогда делить на части. Тем самым еще повысите заинтересованность аудитории. 3. Не бойте

🔥1110👍6

Signed Misha Kirichenko

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nesuraznye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,178,938 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Несу разные мысли 💭” (@nesuraznye), 263 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nesuraznye.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.