Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🕹СВОБОДЕН БЫТЬ СОБОЙ

Channel

🕹СВОБОДЕН БЫТЬ СОБОЙ

@neskazhulopnu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

171subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002108166041
TypeChannel
Username@neskazhulopnu
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/neskazhulopnu

Growth

170171170.58 August 2026 — 171 subscribers8 August 2026 — 171 subscribers8 August 2026 — 170 subscribers15 August 2026 — 171 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 170–171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:44171+1
8 Aug 2026, 20:32170-1
8 Aug 2026, 15:00171no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:15171first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 12s
Average length
3m 04s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

141 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4431.2%
❤‍🔥4229.8%
🔥3625.5%
💯96.38%
👏64.26%
🦄42.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2025 to 5 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @neskazhulopnu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 March 2025 to 5 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Dec 2025, 13:51 UTC446 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Еще пара отзывов вдогонку ❤️

👍1🔥1

5 Dec 2025, 13:50 UTC447 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Йоу! Вот он, красавец — инструмент для руководителей отдела продаж и самих продавцов. который точно упростит жизнь и повысит доход. Получилось вкусно и эффективно. Зацените демку интерфейса 😎 И конечно мне очень интересно услышать мнение тех, кто причастен к теме продаж (биз.тренеры, руководители и продавцы, предприниматели). Кстати уже первые пользователи отмечают рост конверсии в продажах на 20-25%. Прикиньте!!

7 Sept 2025, 15:09 UTC546 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вытекающее следствие Цена стремления к беззаботной жизни — зависимость от заботящегося. Думаю, это и так понятно. Но не очевидное для меня следствие — автоматическая программа, толкающая адаптироваться под желания и оценки значимых (а потом просто всех) людей. И это тоже легко объяснить. Ведь, если хочется быть под заботой и ни о чем не париться (казалось бы), то придётся подчиняться воле тех, кто определяет достан

🔥3👍2

3 Sept 2025, 08:26 UTC428 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

О ВЗРОСЛОСТИ Размышлял о взрослости. И так, и сяк этот вопрос крутил, но тяготило меня быть взрослым. Это ж груз ответственности, обязательств, долженствований и сплошная работа-работа-работа 😤😫 Спрашивает меня партнёр как-то, мол, а какой жизни хочешь? Хочу платье и на ручки Хочу беззаботной, радостной, весёлой жизни, чтобы все само и наилучшим образом, отвечаю я. Отвечаю уверенно! Ведь так должен жить настоящий

👍5🔥3

17 Jun 2025, 21:59 UTC457 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В тему внутренней свободы делюсь постом любимой Ирины Мальцевой (дом Некеле). Мы не должны никому давать объяснения и отчитываться, пока наши действия не причиняют боль или не посягают на других. Сколько жизней было разрушено этой необходимостью «объяснять», которая обычно подразумевает, чтобы вас «поняли», то есть оправдали. Пускай судят по вашим поступкам, и по ним — о ваших истинных намерениях, но знайте, что с

❤‍🔥2💯2

13 Jun 2025, 18:00 UTC316 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я там с кейсом про адаптацию новых сотрудников буду выступать. Приходи к 11 утра

🔥2

13 Jun 2025, 17:59 UTC321 viewsread 8 August 2026

🗓 18 июня 2025 года — онлайн-конференция «Продажи + ИИ: честный разговор о возможностях и границах» 📍 В Telegram-канале «Цифровой переворот» 🎟 Участие бесплатное ⚡️ Тема конференции: Как изменились продажи в реальных компаниях после внедрения ИИ. Где технологии приносят результат, а где — остаются игрушками. ИИ в продажах — это сумма технологий, из которых каждый пытается собрать сегодня свой собственный набор инст

4 Jun 2025, 12:17 UTC222 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Проще говоря, признание проблемы/факта есть хорошее начало для запуска перемен.

👍3

4 Jun 2025, 07:04 UTC221 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Свобода быть собой не началась с принятия себя. Она началась с точного, почти хирургического взгляда: а кто, собственно, я? Недавнее наблюдение: одной из самых незаметных, но мощных тюрем оказалось моё собственное желание быть взрослым, «проработанным» и независимым. Парадоксально, но именно эта установка долго мешала увидеть простую вещь — местами я незрел. Инфантилен. Реагирую не как автор своей жизни, а как авто

❤‍🔥3👍3🔥1

13 May 2025, 06:09 UTC292 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ВЛАДЕНИЕ Первая попытка «замутить бизнес» пришла в голову ещё 2005 году. Тогда работал в Альфа-Банке и грезил палаткой с шаурмой 🌯 Шеф тогда пропал моё заявление на увольнение со словами о важности набраться опыта (потом ещё 3 раза отговаривал). Мысль не отпускала до конца и в 2012 году я открыл ООО. Не, не так — о-о-о-о-о! Казалось, что сам факт регистрации компании делаем меня небожителем и сейчас перевернёт всю

🔥7❤‍🔥5👍4

12 May 2025, 08:46 UTC236 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🌿 Кто-то должен быть просто рядом О зелёных людях. Или, как говорит Адизес, об Интеграторах Иногда, когда долго работаешь с людьми, начинаешь видеть в командах тех, кого почти не видно. Они не кричат, не спорят, не лезут первыми. Но стоит им исчезнуть — и становится как-то пусто. Воздух другой. Холоднее. Недавно мне на тренинге задали вопрос: — А как понять, кто в команде незаменимый? Я улыбнулся. Не потому, что з

❤‍🔥6

8 May 2025, 05:33 UTC216 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ни разу ещё не получалось что-то сделать толково, когда к делу подходил серьёзно и с напряжением⚡ Играючи, налегке, припеваючи и с чувством беззаботности — мой рецепт хорошего результата (не путать с безответственностью и раздолбайством 🤪). Ну ещё хорошенько приправить Смелостью. Без неё совсем никак, пресно и невкусно.

👍7💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @neskazhulopnu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 728,984 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🕹СВОБОДЕН БЫТЬ СОБОЙ” (@neskazhulopnu), 171 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neskazhulopnu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.