Channel
@neqahravan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
308subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 9 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003909070913 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neqahravan |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neqahravan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 10:38 | 308 | +6 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 13:22 | 302 | no change |
| 9 Oct 2026, 12:47 | 302 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (1 October 2026 – 9 October 2026) |
| Views total | 760 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
10 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 تخفیف ویژه + پرداخت اقساطی! 📚 پایاننامه، مقاله و تحلیل آماری با کیفیت بالا ✅ مشاوره رایگان قبل از سفارش 💳 اقساطی طبق شرایط خودتون https://t.me/+Yfi6f-sLJHk0YjY0 🍓مثل بلبل انگلیسی صحبت کن ❍@grobp1 🍓درخواستpdfرایگان کتابهای روانشناسی ❍@ravan_book 🍓رویکردهای درمانی تخصصی روانشناسی ❍@psycho_approaches 🍓قبولی کنکور با برترینها ❍@ravaan_yaar 🍓انگلیسی کودکان و نوجوانان Kids English ❍@englishkidsenglish 🍓کافه م…
گاهی مشکل از امروز نیست... گاهی آدمی را بیش از اندازه میترساند از دست دادن، چون یکبار در گذشته، ماندنِ آدمهای مهم زندگیاش قابل اعتماد نبوده. گاهی بیش از حد کوتاه میآید، چون یاد گرفته برای دوست داشته شدن باید خودش را نادیده بگیرد. گاهی از صمیمیت فرار میکند، چون نزدیک شدن را با آسیب خوردن تجربه کرده. و گاهی مدام دنبال تأیید دیگران است، چون هنوز صدای درونیِ «کافی نیستی» را با خودش حمل میکند. در طرحوارهدرمانی، ای…
اگه من با احساساتم روبرو نشم چه اتفاقی میوفته🤔 @neqahravan
❤2
طرحواره و ذهنیت این فصل ⁉️ @neqahravan
❤1
رفتار نگهبان خودآرام بخش @neqahravan
❤1
🔶 دوشنبه های تحلیل کتاب 📚 منبع : کتاب روایت یک خود یکپارچه 📝 نویسنده: دکتر محمد فغان پور گنجی بخش ملاقات با نگهبان خود آرام بخش @neqahravan
دوره جامع آسیبشناسی روانی | روانشناسی مرضی بر اساس DSM-5-TR اگر میخواهید اختلالات روانشناختی را از تشخیص تا شناخت و درک بالینی بهصورت جامع و ساختارمند یاد بگیرید، این دوره برای شماست. 🎓 مدرس: دکتر کوثر انصاری دکتری تخصصی روانشناسی مدرس دانشگاه طرحوارهدرمانگر 📌 دوره ۶ ماهه 📜 همراه با گواهی معتبر 💻 حضوری و آفلاین 📅 شروع: هفته اول آذر 🗓 پنجشنبهها ⏰ ساعت ۱۶:۳۰ تا ۱۹ 📍 ساری-کلینیک بهار 📞 جهت رزرو و کسب اطلاعات …
بنظرشما کدام اختلال است؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
تاریخچه روانشناختی: والدین دنیل شخصیت عجیب و غریب داشتند، و در کودکی با دنیل سرد رفتار میکردند و او را طرد میکردند، از همین رو دنیل بیشتر وقتها از اجتماع فاصله میگرفت و با دیگران ارتباط نمیگرفت، والدینش صحبتی از جنس صمیمیت و محبت با دنیل نداشتند و بیشتر درمورد روح،قدرت جادویی و طلسم صحبت میکردند. طی بررسی ها دنیل کودکی شاد و نرمالی نداشته است. https://t.me/neqahravan
#کیس_ریپوت مشخصات بیمار: اسم:دنیل(فرضی) سن:۳۳ساله تحصیلات:سوم راهنمایی تمام نکرد شغل: سی دی فروشی،شغل ثابتی نداره وضعیت تاهل؛نامزدی دنیل به شدت در رعایت نکات بهداشتی و غذا خوردن بی توجه هست. با جمع ها از نظر آداب و رسوم همخوان نیست، ذهنش دائما درگیر روح و احضار آن هست، به علت عدم همخوانی با آداب و رسوم جاری جامعه نامزدش بشدت احساس نارضایتی و نگرانی دارد اما برایش مهم نیست، معمولا جمع هایی را دنبال می کند که به قدرت…
🛑یکشنبه های کیس ریپورت🛑
🎬 A Beautiful Mind | ذهن زیبا – ۲۰۰۱ ژانر: درام، زندگینامهای، روانشناختی موضوعات روانشناختی: اسکیزوفرنی، ادراک واقعیت، توهم، روابط عاطفی و سازگاری. 🧠 خلاصه داستان فیلم داستان جان نش، ریاضیدان نابغهای را روایت میکند که در مسیر زندگی و حرفهاش با تجربههایی پیچیده دربارهی واقعیت و ادراک مواجه میشود. فیلم نشان میدهد این تجربهها چگونه بر روابط، زندگی شخصی و مسیر حرفهای او تأثیر میگذارند. ✨ نکته روانشناختی ف…
🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @neqahravan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بنظرشما کدام اختلال است؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2026 to 9 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نِقاهِروان|دکتر کوثر انصاری” (@neqahravan), 308 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neqahravan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.