Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ро

Channel

Ро

@nekijzlonamerennyj

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4subscribers

-1,259 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002089026869
TypeChannel
Username@nekijzlonamerennyj
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nekijzlonamerennyj

Growth

11,274637.56 August 2026 — 1,263 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,262 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,273 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,270 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,274 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,272 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,273 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,272 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,267 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4 subscribers46 August 202615 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 40 days, net -1,259. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 19:364+3
8 Sept 2026, 10:161-1,266
3 Sept 2026, 00:541,267-5
28 Aug 2026, 04:041,272-1
25 Aug 2026, 09:521,273+1
22 Aug 2026, 17:241,272-2
19 Aug 2026, 13:481,274+4
16 Aug 2026, 22:141,270-3
13 Aug 2026, 09:241,273+11
7 Aug 2026, 09:541,262-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:321,263first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 7 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4837.5%
custom 52738334255753555713829.7%
custom 592051559608825024397.03%
👍86.25%
🤝86.25%
🔥64.69%
🌚43.13%
custom 499716621807596435521.56%
😁21.56%
custom 500821238862997194910.781%
custom 527409932270568268010.781%
🤯10.781%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC109 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На подумать. А пару лет назад я как-то кидал это видео: https://youtu.be/zGedwEYNh70

custom 52738334255753555714🤯1

6 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC57 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @tolk_tolk

У западных социальных антропологов всё больше вижу осознания опасности того, что мужчины-аутасйдеры лишаются возможности создания семьи и даже просто отношений с женщинами. В истории уже были и есть примеры, к чему это может привести – примерно так обстояло и обстоит с мужчинами-аутсайдерами в обществах с полигамией, где ресурсные мужчины забирают себе не одну женщину, а больше. Если в исламе ресурсный мужчина имеет …

❤5

5 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC270 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @BuchenkovGAPhoto

Вчера на канале МОСКВЫБОРЫ вышел пост об организации политических дебатов. Я откликнулся и вызвал представителей партии «Новые люди» подискутировать на тему их инициативы о криминализации «домашнего насилия». Ожидаемо НЛ на дебаты не спешит. Может, сказать нечего, а, может, и сами в большинстве своем не поддерживают «людоедскую» инициативу Горячевой. Мой вызов в чате массово поддержали и «залайкали». И всё же нек…

custom 527383342557535557120👍5😁2

5 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC331 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Во всю работаю на работе, параллельно пилю контент для бусти МЛ, своего канала и вместе с этим пытаюсь немного лайферством заниматься. Потому оригинальные посты пока малость забуксовали. Возможно в пятницу, возможно на выходных выкачу несколько лонгридов не просто про биопроблемы, а скорее про что-то около философское, что немного перекликается с этим всем. Честно, биопроблебная тематика настолько надоела сама по се…

custom 527383342557535557114🤝8

4 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC293 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @conspirolog_dedPhoto

Сторонницы идеи сажать людей на 2-3 года за шлепки, толчки или щипки: - Большое насилие начинается с малого! Если не сажать за разовые побои, то побиватель почувствует безнаказанность, войдет во вкус, с ним случится оборзение, и побои перерастут в убои! Реальная статистика по убийствам и причинению вреда здоровью от МВД РФ: - Да херЪ там плавал! После декриминализации разовых побоев в 2017 году число убийств и случа…

❤31👍1

4 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC302 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mosvybory

⚡️⚡️ПЕРВАЯ ПАРА ОППОНЕНТОВ НА ДЕБАТЫ НАШЛАСЬ⚡️⚡️ Сразу 2 кандидата по Чертановскому округу №209 откликнулись под нашим постом. Это Игорь Жилин (Яблоко) и Егор Коськов (ЛДПР). Кирилл Гончаров из федерального списка Яблока также согласился на дебаты с депутатом МГД от Новых Людей Александром Даванковым. Ждем ответа от Даванкова. Также из кандидатов в комментариях в дебатах хотели бы поучаствовать: Вера Мысина (КПРФ…

❤7🔥6👍2

4 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC350 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Небольшая подборОчка его других работ

custom 59205155960882502439❤5🌚4custom 49971662180759643552custom 50082123886299719491custom 52740993227056826801

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @nekijzlonamerennyj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ро” (@nekijzlonamerennyj), 4 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nekijzlonamerennyj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.