Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Гордей в деле

Channel

Гордей в деле

@spravedlivost_MGD2024

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,061subscribers

-45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002037076784
TypeChannel
Username@spravedlivost_MGD2024
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/spravedlivost_MGD2024

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,0612,1062,083.56 August 2026 — 2,106 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,106 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,105 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,101 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,096 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,097 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,093 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,092 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,087 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,082 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,078 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,074 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,070 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,061 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,054–2,113 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 06:392,061-9
13 Sept 2026, 04:372,070-4
9 Sept 2026, 05:382,074-4
3 Sept 2026, 15:402,078-4
31 Aug 2026, 11:352,082-5
28 Aug 2026, 13:242,087-5
25 Aug 2026, 18:362,092-1
22 Aug 2026, 09:552,093-4
19 Aug 2026, 05:572,097+1
16 Aug 2026, 14:142,096-5
12 Aug 2026, 22:042,101-4
10 Aug 2026, 08:352,105-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:002,106no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:182,106first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 30s
Average length
2m 15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

474 reactions across 19 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 536651333085485222627157.2%
❤275.70%
👍234.85%
💯214.43%
😨194.01%
🤬163.38%
😱153.16%
🤯142.95%
🍾122.53%
🙏91.90%
👏71.48%
😁61.27%
🔥51.05%
🤮51.05%
🤝40.844%
🎉30.633%
🤔30.633%
🥰30.633%
❤‍🔥20.422%
😢20.422%
6 further kinds71.48%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 474 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @spravedlivost_MGD2024. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC29 views10 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mensleagueruVideo

Поддержать ассоциацию «Мужская Лига» можно на официальном сайте нашей организации: мужскаялига.рф. Вы можете единоразово поддержать нашу деятельность или оформить ежемесячный платёж. Также рекомендуем подписаться на закрытые информационные платформы Мужской Лиги в boosty или Вконтакте.

custom 53665133308548522269❤1

7 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC116 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, сегодня отмечаем Международный день холостяка! Кстати, обратили внимание как изменилось в обществе восприятие холостяка? Из немытого потребителя пельменей в мятой рубашке холостяк превратился в уверенного в себе мужчину, знающего себе цену, идущего к своим собственным целям, умеющего жить в моменте и наслаждаться жизнью. Такие вот дела;) Всех причастных с праздником! Ура!!!🥳 #гордейвделе #мужскаялига

🍾12custom 53665133308548522267🎉3❤1🥰1

7 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC93 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nekijzlonamerennyjPhoto

Приветствую маленьких любителей радикализма. Тут меня интересные мыслишки посетили. А что это у нас имеется множество исследований по связи или корреляции сторонников всякого рода радикальных идеологий (и даже тех же инцелов) с аутизмом, аспергером, ОКР, депрессией и прочими психическими расстройствами, но вот академическое сообщество в упор отказывается упоминать в своих исследованиях тех же радикальных феминисток? …

custom 53665133308548522265🔥4❤2🤯1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC178 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SOBR_MLPhoto

⚔️ СОБР | НАБЕГ - ИТОГИ 💪 Набег в чат канала МОСКВЫБОРЫ прошел архи-успешно! Подробности будут во внутреннем чате СОБРа. 🏆 Мы обратили внимание канала, организовывающего дебаты между представителями разных политических сил, на необходимость обсудить инциативу депутата Горячевой о криминализации побоев. И настолько качественно это сделали, что даже получили нужную обратную связь. И это еще не всё! ❗Выражаем огромн…

custom 536651333085485222619❤1

6 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC266 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Джаред Лето лишился роли в фильме из-за обвинений в сексуализированном насилии Он должен был сыграть роль в фильме Барри Левинсона «Убийство». Однако после последних обвинений эту роль Джаред потерял, пишет Page Six со ссылкой на источники. Его участие в фильме было уже почти согласованным, но громкие обвинения «стало невозможно игнорировать», поэтому от участия Лето пришлось отказаться. ——— Друзья, чтобы сломать …

😨16🤬7💯4🤔3❤1🗿1🤯1

6 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC231 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SOBR_MLPhoto

⚔️ СОБР | РЕЙД - ИТОГИ 💪 Рейд в канал Николая Старикова завершен. 🏆 Мы обратили внимание Николая Старикова и его аудитории на проблему разного наказания для мужчин и женщин за одни и те же преступления. Поэтому возобновление смертной казни коснётся только мужчин и не поможет в борьбе с терактами, совершаемыми женщинами. ❗Выражаем огромную благодарность всем принявшим участие в этой интернет-акции. Парни,так держа…

custom 536651333085485222615❤3🤝1

5 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC301 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, завтра мы продолжим разбирать демографическую историю Румынии. Ранее мы уже выяснили, что романтиков к власти допускать нельзя - из-за них фашизм и Чаушески случаются. Теперь пришло время разобраться, какими именно мерами (спойлер: абсолютно не романтическими) удалось поднять рождаемость в условиях социалистической Румынии. Демографический андеграунд: каждый четверг в 18:00. У микрофона - Михаил Филиппов.…

custom 536651333085485222620❤2

5 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC132 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BuchenkovGAPhoto

Вчера на канале МОСКВЫБОРЫ вышел пост об организации политических дебатов. Я откликнулся и вызвал представителей партии «Новые люди» подискутировать на тему их инициативы о криминализации «домашнего насилия». Ожидаемо НЛ на дебаты не спешит. Может, сказать нечего, а, может, и сами в большинстве своем не поддерживают «людоедскую» инициативу Горячевой. Мой вызов в чате массово поддержали и «залайкали». И всё же нек…

custom 536651333085485222620👏7👍4❤‍🔥2❤1🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC274 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, я правильно понял - условка за поджёг военкомата? Серьезно?!😳 - а что, так можно было? - конечно, но только если ты женщина Никак не пойму: это патриархат или уже равноправие? 🤔 Помогите разобраться. Пишите комментарии⬇️⬇️⬇️ #гордейвделе #мужскаялига

😱15🤬9😨3❤1🫡1

4 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC255 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, наши в городе! Мы и впредь будем использовать любую возможность, чтобы придать защите прав мужчин общественный резонанс. Следите за новостями. Всё только начинается. Работаем! #гордейвделе #мужскаялига

custom 536651333085485222622❤3🔥1🫡1

4 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC261 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, если есть кто-то, кто каким-то странным образом ещё не подписан на Boosty Антона Сорвачёва - «Феминостратегия», искренне рекомендую посмотреть этот стрим на YouTube. P.S. тем, кто подписан на Boosty и в курсе Феминостратегии, во избежании ментальной травмы, настоятельно не рекомендую читать комментарии под этим видео. #гордейвделе #мужскаялига

custom 536651333085485222612❤3👍2🤮1

4 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC181 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SOBR_MLPhoto

⚔️ СОБР | ЭКСТРЕННЫЙ НАБЕГ ❗ Мужская Лига выступила против инициативы К.А.Горячевой о криминализации «домашнего насилия» и вызвала партию на дебаты. В канале МОСКВЫБОРЫ предложили организовать дебаты между московскими политиками. Член правления Мужской Лиги Григорий Бученков поднял тему дебатов с Новыми Людьми. 🎯 Цель набега: Поддержать предложение Григория Бученкова о дебатах, рассказать аудитории паблика, чем оп…

custom 536651333085485222619❤2⚡1👍1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @spravedlivost_MGD2024. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Депутат Дмитрий Кузнецов
@deputatdvkuznetsov · 21,074
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 September 2026
Татьяна Буцкая
@TatianaButskaya · 23,816
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
СОЮЗ ОТЦОВ РОССИИ
@soyzotcov · 98,897
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гордей в деле” (@spravedlivost_MGD2024), 2,061 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spravedlivost_MGD2024.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.