Channel
@naumovets_me
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
844subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001095946001 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @naumovets_me |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/naumovets_me |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 844 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:55 | 843 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 845 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 842 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 846 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 847 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:59 | 847 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 29 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
109 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 52.3% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 39.4% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 8.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2021 to 26 January 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня наш подкаст «Предоставленные неудобства» преодолел отметку в 2000 подписчиков на Яндекс.Музыке. До сих пор вспоминаю, что первоначальная цель в 300 подписчиков казалась нам очень даже амбициозной. До сих пор удивляюсь, что наши разговоры и шутки могут увлекать совершенно незнакомых нам людей. До сих пор восхищаюсь обложками наших выпусков в первом сезоне. Спасибо нашей прекрасной команде. Спасибо нашим прек…
❤55🔥15
Мокап, макет, модель и муляж Так как уже четыре месяца моя должность официально называется «руководитель отдела текстов и дизайна», могу себе позволить писать и про дизайн тоже. Тем более что в области дизайна я полнейший дилетант (как, впрочем, и в области текстов). Зато мне всё интересно, и всё в новинку🙃 Вот, например, узнал слово мокап. Мокапы — это изображения, которые используют, чтобы показать заказчику диз…
🔥19
Бот в помощь! Канал «Адовый UX» написал про редизайн мобильного приложения Альфа-Банка — мол, стало заметно хуже. Что сделал Альфа-Банк? Нагнал в комментарии к посту десятки ботов без аватарок, которые написали реплики в поддержку банка друг за другом с разницей в 5 минут. 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️ #ненадотак! Никогда не надо так делать!
😢9
Яндекс.Кью и Марина Великанова рассказывают, что такое мондегрин. Захотелось собрать полный список мондегринов на русском — красавица Икуку, повесика, скрипка-лиса... что ещё вспоминается? #великиймогучий
🔥9❤1
Билайн или билайн?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
И как теперь писать «билайн»? Сегодня Билайн (ой, то есть теперь уже билайн) представил обновленный бренд: В последние годы люди все больше склоняют и пишут с маленькой буквы многие слова. И это не потому что они не знают, как правильно. А потому что так удобнее и быстрее. Мы стремимся быть ближе к людям. Поэтому название бренда теперь всегда имеет строчное написание — билайн. Так мы делаем акцент на человечности,…
❤1
Антикризисный процесс: что делать и кто виноват, когда в соцсетях про вас не пишут ничего хорошего А вот и видеозапись моего недавнего доклада на конференции Social Intelligence Day: https://youtu.be/OsneLfn5d5I Для меня это очень важное выступление. Во-первых, интересно рассказать о чём-то свеженьком — о том, чем занимался последние полгода. Во-вторых, это последнее моё выступление в качестве руководителя отдела в…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @naumovets_me. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Билайн или билайн?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2021 to 26 January 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“naumovets.me” (@naumovets_me), 844 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naumovets_me.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.