Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,470–23,602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 13:59
23,485
-26
17 Sept 2026, 01:01
23,511
-6
15 Sept 2026, 03:00
23,517
-2
13 Sept 2026, 12:17
23,519
+10
11 Sept 2026, 18:58
23,509
-16
9 Sept 2026, 05:16
23,525
+7
5 Sept 2026, 18:16
23,518
+11
3 Sept 2026, 19:37
23,507
+2
2 Sept 2026, 09:58
23,505
+4
1 Sept 2026, 06:58
23,501
-2
31 Aug 2026, 03:47
23,503
-13
30 Aug 2026, 03:28
23,516
-16
29 Aug 2026, 05:04
23,532
-7
28 Aug 2026, 03:05
23,539
+3
27 Aug 2026, 02:57
23,536
+14
26 Aug 2026, 02:54
23,522
-2
25 Aug 2026, 05:36
23,524
+8
24 Aug 2026, 04:04
23,516
+24
22 Aug 2026, 08:45
23,492
+3
20 Aug 2026, 20:38
23,489
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.2%
avg views ÷ 23,485 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,150
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
41 (24 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
73,810
Reactions total
6,146
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 11:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
25s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22,602 reactions across 41 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
15,731
69.6%
🍓
1,874
8.29%
🔥
1,410
6.24%
🥰
1,113
4.92%
👍
644
2.85%
💯
566
2.50%
🙏
348
1.54%
😍
336
1.49%
💔
160
0.708%
😢
153
0.677%
😁
113
0.5%
👏
93
0.411%
🤩
43
0.19%
🤯
18
0.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,602 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 41 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @natalina_maller. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
На прошлой неделе клиентка сказала мне: «Я полтора года собиралась записаться к психологу. А когда наконец пришла, то не смогла объяснить, зачем. Просто сидела и говорила: ну, у меня вроде всё нормально, но что-то не так.»
Я это слышу постоянно. И каждый раз отвечаю одно и то же: «что-то не так» — это и есть запрос. С ним можно прийти. С ним можно работать. Никакого доклада готовить не нужно))
Первые сессии обычно …
Влюбить за 40 минут❤️
В 1997 году социальный психолог Артур Аран провел эксперимент. Он посадил в лаборатории совершенно незнакомых мужчин и женщин друг напротив друга и дал им список из 36 вопросов. Задания были разбиты на три блока — от простых и нейтральных до глубоких, откровенных и очень личных.
Суть эксперимента была простой, но гениальной: постепенное, взаимное и искреннее раскрытие выстраивает между людьми …
Клиенты
Каждый раз за несколько минут до начала сессии я делаю паузу, чтобы настроить свой внутренний инструмент.
В терапию приходят абсолютно разные люди. С уникальным жизненным опытом, своим темпом, защитными механизмами и представлением о том, что для них означает «безопасность». Одному клиенту прямо сейчас необходимы четкая структура, понятные границы и логика. Другому — мягкая тишина и возможность просто попла…
Я готова бесконечно признаваться в любви осени! Для меня это самое таинственное, уютное и особенное время года, с искренним трепетом жду его наступления🤩🤩
Воздух становится прохладным и прозрачным, хочется немного замедлиться, достать любимые уютные вещи, взять согревающий кофе и просто наблюдать, как меняется всё вокруг. Последние несколько лет осень приносит мне чувство особого обновления, тихой радости и внутренн…
Иногда я ложусь и думаю о том, какое счастливое у меня было детство…
Если бы можно было выбрать абсолютно любую эпоху, чтобы родиться заново, я бы без колебаний снова выбрала нулевые.
Помню, бесконечные прогулки после школы с одноклассниками и салки на переменах. Помню, как папа каждую неделю после работы покупал мне журнал «Веселый художник». Помню горячий бутерброд с докторской колбасой и расплавленным сыром…
В …
Долгое время я вообще не могла читать художественную литературу. И только недавно осознала, что за этим стопором стояла повышенная тревожность (+ отдельное спасибо за это коротким видео) и, как следствие, полная невозможность сосредоточиться. Мозг просто отказывался долго удерживать фокус.
В какой-то момент я решила попробовать мягкую дисциплину и договорилась с собой читать всего по 15 минут в день. На удивление, с…
5 типов людей от которых НАДО БЕЖАТЬ!
1. Безответственные незрелыши
Это люди, которые не способны брать ответственность за свои слова и поступки. Они абсолютно не считаются с чувствами собеседника и обожают прикрывать невоспитанность фразами вроде: «Я не могу тебя обидеть, ты просто сама решила обидеться». Они используют дешевые манипуляции, чтобы сдвинуть фокус с собственного некрасивого поведения на вашу «чрезмер…
Мотивация на понедельник ✨💐
Чужой успех — это прекрасный маркер того, что в этом мире вообще возможно. Он расширяет наше представление о доступном, дает дерзость мечтать и подсвечивает новые ориентиры. Но попытка точь-в-точь скопировать чужой путь почти всегда приводит к разочарованию.
Когда мы смотрим на чей-то результат, мы видим лишь вершину айсберга. За скобками всегда остаются скрытые переменные: стартовые усл…
Как вам еще и такой подгон?
https://youtu.be/kx7F1YVKQzo?si=NIxFvMouXHDZVJzZ
❤233🍓45🔥29🥰9
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @natalina_maller. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
poluska @poluskavas · 241,327 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 15 September 2026
мысли о жизни | алина солопова @alinasinspiration · 31,083 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
Kristina Laktionova @laktionovaaaaa · 53,703 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
МАЛЫШКА ПО @polyaam · 28,295 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 9 September 2026
Дмитрий Компаниец / Mindset @dmitrykompaniets · 40,871 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
Златушка🍑 @babbiebuttt · 128,990 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“малина маллер 🩶” (@natalina_maller), 23,485 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natalina_maller.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.