Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 37 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 364–370 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 03:37
367
-1
4 Sept 2026, 16:00
368
-1
29 Aug 2026, 00:12
369
+3
22 Aug 2026, 18:33
366
+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:24
365
no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:17
365
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
71 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
30
42.3%
❤
10
14.1%
👍
9
12.7%
💯
6
8.45%
custom 5341291474711498169
4
5.63%
custom 5233730869256016719
3
4.23%
🙏
3
4.23%
❤🔥
2
2.82%
👀
2
2.82%
😁
1
1.41%
🥰
1
1.41%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я исследую карьерные треки руководителей и сама стараюсь прокачивать управленческие навыки и видение, общаюсь с руководителями разных уровней и сфер бизнеса. Например, эти исследования можно почитать в канале в рубрике #ROADtoHEAD.
Сейчас многие руководители чувствуют, что привычные подходы уже не работают, а как действовать по-новому, пока непонятно.
У Любы Яровой вышел бесплатный курс «Какие навыки нужны руководи…
Анализ вакансий CRM-маркетологов по данным hh.ru за июнь 2026 г.
❗️Новое: соотношение удаленки, офиса и гибрида, средние зарплаты в зависимости от опыта работы.
#рынокCRMвакансий
Мой TGK | Сообщество ВК | MAX
Как работает акцент на УТП. Разбор ТВ-кампаний ВТБ: почему один креатив работает, а другой сливает бюджет
#марком_лаб_храмцова
Проанализировала два свежих ТВ-ролика ВТБ. Казалось бы, один банк, один медиаканал, но с точки зрения маркетинговых коммуникаций это два принципиально разных подхода (скрины в комментариях).
🔴 Кампания №1: «Зачисляй, храни, трать»
https://rutube.ru/video/fa146ba4e1c2bb855ead4fc59a373c30/
К…
Хотите вебинар с разбором ваших кейсов/ответами на вопросы?
Хочуnot shown
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
Коллеги, актуальная информация по инфраструктуре каналов в этот четверг, 18 июня, участие бесплатное. Можно будет задавать вопросы в эфире. Держим руку на пульсе.
📩 Когда SMS дорожают, часть каналов работает нестабильно, а прогнозы меняются быстрее, чем успеваешь обновлять презентации, вопросов становится больше, чем ответов 😅
Что сейчас вообще происходит с коммуникациями?
Куда уходит трафик?
Какие каналы реально работают, а какие существуют уже скорее по привычке? 👀
Мы решили не гадать, а разобраться нормально.
📅 18 июня в 12:00 делаем вебинар и зовём в гости Максима Кюрег…
Миф о «других KPI»: почему B2B и B2C говорят на одном языке
На днях у меня случился любопытный диалог с CRM-эксперткой из эдтеха. Я услышала утверждение о том, что
в B2C другие KPI.
Это вызвало у меня недоумение. Я возражаю, и вот мои аргументы.
Что важно для бизнеса на обоих типах рынков?
На верхнем уровне у любого бизнеса цели одни и те же:
✔️Деньги (выручка, маржа). Вряд ли b2c работает "за улыбки".
✔️ Количест…
Дорогие друзья!
Сейчас я работаю над своим профессиональным позиционированием и развитием и хочу попросить вас заполнить форму и ответить на 10 вопросов обо мне и моей деятельности: https://forms.gle/nzKpvFRa9K7umBr96.
Мне важно получить такую обратную связь, чтобы понимать свои перспективы и построить план действий на профессиональный трек. Форма анонимная, поэтому я попрошу вас быть максимально честными, именно э…
custom 52337308692560167193👍2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @natalia_khrm_crm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хотите вебинар с разбором ваших кейсов/ответами на вопросы?
Хочуnot shown
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
В пятницу Mailing Day. Хотите репортаж? Какие темы интересны - напишите, пожалуйста, в комментариях.
Хочу репортаж89%
Не нужно, спасибо11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наталья Храмцова про CRM-маркетинг и рост🌱” (@natalia_khrm_crm), 367 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natalia_khrm_crm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.