Channel
@nastia_vidit_zhizn
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
303subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002136759174 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nastia_vidit_zhizn |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nastia_vidit_zhizn |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 303 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 306 | -13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 319 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 325 | -12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 337 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:51 | 348 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 349 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 2 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
86 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 41.9% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 16.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 15.1% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 8.14% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 4.65% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 4.65% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 2.33% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.33% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Много думаю о том, что хочу создавать длинный и медленный контент, и о том, чтобы улучшать свои нетворкинг скиллы. Делаю к этому первый шаг завтра - участвую в конференции вместе с шестью умнейшими женщинами. Приходите! Это мой первый опыт онлайна, буду позориться 😎 Регистрация через бот @amaya_checkerbot
🔥3
Готова первая картина из серии Таро. Вживую она гипнотизирует даже меня саму, я жутко довольна. $1770, позднее по этой серии будут принты
❤🔥7❤3🔥1🥰1
У нас тут Дуров в Тбилиси, ему от вас что-нибудь передать?
😁4🤔2
Давно не делилась своим плейлистом для прогулки. Идеально подходит для солнечного дня и не только. Послушать на спотифай
❤3
Девочки, общий сбор!!! Вы тоже заметили, что последние месяцы приходится протирать камеру айфона перед КАЖДОЙ попыткой снять что-либо, иначе кадр будет выглядеть грязным? Я спросила знакомых, все подтвердили, что раньше такого не было, и в связи с этим у меня возникла теория заговора, что это сделали специально системно. Но я не могла это доказать. Ровно до сейчас. Случайно заметила, что на макро режиме камера в п…
😱4❤2😐2💯1
Провожала вчера закат с таким видом
❤14💔7💘1
Если бы не ИИ, я бы не могла писать картины. Во всяком случае так, как делаю это сейчас. На этой картине мне нужно было перерисовать руки. Я сообразила, как сформулировать запрос в джемини, он разложил рисунок на цвета, и руки сразу стали похожи на руки.
🔥6
Ведение нескольких соц сетей, как видно, не мой конек, но я попробую снова. Привет) С момента последней публикации я успела продать картину с оленями, сделать партию пупсов (это была ошибка), сгонять в Сербию и застать самое красивее лето в своей жизни. Покажу и вам.
❤🔥6❤3🔥1
Сегодня такая доставка
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥3❤1
Однажды Хемингуэй поспорил, что напишет самый короткий трогательный рассказ. Он выиграл спор, написав всего восемь слов: Мою картину вчера чуть не купили за $1900.
❤10🤣1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @nastia_vidit_zhizn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Настя видит жизнь” (@nastia_vidit_zhizn), 303 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastia_vidit_zhizn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.