Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анастасия Кириленко | Дыхательные практики

Channel

Анастасия Кириленко | Дыхательные практики

@nastia_krlnk

Not marked by Telegram, checked 20 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,537subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002182130956
TypeChannel
Username@nastia_krlnk
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nastia_krlnk

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,5364,5864,56128 August 2026 — 4,586 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,575 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,573 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,558 subscribers8 September 2026 — 4,544 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,536 subscribers16 September 2026 — 4,537 subscribers4,53728 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 19 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,529–4,594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 01:384,537+1
12 Sept 2026, 14:584,536-8
8 Sept 2026, 23:404,544-14
3 Sept 2026, 19:214,558-15
31 Aug 2026, 12:444,573-2
28 Aug 2026, 20:234,575-11
28 Aug 2026, 06:464,586first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 16s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

404 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31177.0%
🔥4410.9%
👍215.20%
❤‍🔥102.48%
💯61.49%
👀30.743%
👌30.743%
👏20.495%
😍10.248%
🙏10.248%
🤝10.248%
🦄10.248%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 404 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nastia_krlnk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC706 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Я очень хочу, чтобы как можно больше женщин перестали страдать этой херней по отношению к себе Потому что эти отношения с едой - это лишь верхушка айсберга. Под низом очень много внутреннего недовольства, и чтобы с ним справиться, тело формирует «лишний» вес. Всё может быть намного проще 🥹

31❤‍🔥5💯2

23 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC695 views37 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Если ты хочешь съесть что-то вредное, лучше приготовить белковую или ПП версию 🫴🏻 Звучит здраво… и калорий меньше, и полезнее, и поем 😛 КТО ВООБЩЕ ПРИДУМАЛ ЭТОТ БРЕД??? 🙄 Я регулярно вижу подобные рекомендации у фитнес-блогеров. Это люди, на которых подписаны тысячи. Которые повторяют и следуют им методикам. Методикам людей с расстройствами пищевого поведения, орторексией(делением еду на хорошую/плохую, правильн

28🔥5💯4

20 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC≈1,010 views77 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Спасибо за вашу активность 🙏 вижу ваши ответы, и подготовила для вас немного пояснительной информации 👇 1️⃣ Тип живота «Барабан» Живот выпирает равномерно. Часто здесь дело не в прессе, а в том, что диафрагма и глубокие мышцы живота не включаются как нужно. 2️⃣ Тип живота «Нижний валик» Основной объём — внизу живота. Такое может быть связано с напряжённой диафрагмой и неправильным распределением давления внутри жив

62👍9👀3👌3

19 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC940 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Жду ваших ответов, чуть позже распишу вам про каждую из причин 👌

16

19 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC980 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Посмотрите картинку 👆🏻 Какой вариант больше похож на ваш?

  1. 119%
  2. 255%
  3. 321%
  4. Не могу выбрать6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC974 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Почему живот не уходит, даже если вы стараетесь? 👀 Это ТОП вопрос в моем директе сейчас 🙈 Часто причина не в питании или тренировках, а в том, какой у вас тип живота. У разных типов — разные причины и подход.

7

14 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC≈1,370 views54 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Я очень радуюсь, когда я вижу ваши результаты ❤️ Каждый ваш результат - это ваша заслуга, и я действительно счастлива, что могу быть к этому причастна, я делюсь с вами системой- вы делаете результат. А вообще, у меня очень много ваших отзывов, я все их пересматриваю и читаю 🫂

35🔥8👍6❤‍🔥2👏2😍1

11 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,470 views24 reactionsread 28 August 2026

ТОП вопросов за последнюю неделю 👀 «Настя, почему утром лицо отёкшее?» «Почему тело будто налитое, хотя я не ем много соли?» Я об этом уже много говорила, но повторюсь: Отёки — это не про воду или еду. Когда тело долго живёт в напряжении, дыхание становится поверхностным, диафрагма хуже двигается, а телу сложнее расслабляться и запускать нормальное движение жидкости. Поэтому начинать нужно не с гуаша, массажей и

15👍6🤝1🦄1🙏1

8 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC≈1,430 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Сейчас цифра, когда активно начинает теряться мышечная масса — 25 лет Ещё раз! Наше состояние тела — это не генетика в 80% Нам нужны мышцы 💪🏻 Чтобы они были изначально: 1. Работаем с дыханием 2. Работаем с мобильностью суставов 3. Силовые Первые два пункта закрываются на моем курсе. И дальше, когда сформирован фундамент и вы умеете осознавать тело в пространстве, когда мышцы уже включены в работу — мы прогрессиру

🔥1614❤‍🔥3

8 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC≈1,370 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Часто светятся такие картинки мне, хочу чтобы вы тоже видели Это к вопросу «у меня с возвратом метаболизм замедлился и гормональный фон изменился» По факту — меняется количество мышц. Именно они потребляют много энергии, защищают костные структуры от ломкости, дают объем

10

18 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC≈2,130 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10

18 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC≈2,000 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

9

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @nastia_krlnk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTCAnonymous Poll243 voters

Посмотрите картинку 👆🏻 Какой вариант больше похож на ваш?

  1. 119%
  2. 255%
  3. 321%
  4. Не могу выбрать6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 23 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

растяжка с Дашей 🧘🏼‍♀️
@stretchfitdashaa · 45,771
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
annesoul про питание
@annesoul1 · 45,346
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анастасия Кириленко | Дыхательные практики” (@nastia_krlnk), 4,537 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastia_krlnk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.