Channel
@nashe_blyadstvo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
476subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001199821484 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nashe_blyadstvo |
| Created | 14 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nashe_blyadstvo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 476 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 477 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 477 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
448 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 127 | 28.3% | |
| ❤ | 115 | 25.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 62 | 13.8% | |
| 💔 | 60 | 13.4% | |
| 💋 | 30 | 6.70% | |
| custom 5330337027479051714 | 21 | 4.69% | |
| 🙏 | 12 | 2.68% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 1.79% | |
| 🍾 | 6 | 1.34% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.446% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.446% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.446% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.223% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 448reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2024 to 3 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
конец? мы приняли решение закрыть канал. под «закрыть» мы имеем в виду «эпоха прошла». мы его не удалим, а просто оставим как есть. марита переехала в питер, сейчас ее фокус — карьера. она создала личный канал, скальпель в сумочке. и вести его будет о любимом деле — медицине. я переехала в японию, сейчас мой фокус — изучение языков, поэтому хочу вести свой канал как просто аванеска, которая выживает, переводит фан…
💔60🙏12💘2❤1🔥1
Начат новый макси! 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Пролог и 1 Глава ОПУБЛИКОВАНЫ. Ангст, Драма, Дипломатия, Политика, ПостХог, Аврорат, Министерство Магии, Альтернативная мировая история, Серая мораль, Частичный ООС. В ходе выполнения задания на разрешение конфликта между двумя странами, у Гермионы Грейнджер возникают проблемы куда серьёзнее политических интриг. Теперь на кону, помимо судьбы двух государств, стоит и её жизнь. …
❤6
Signed avanesco
две новые главы перевода Various Storms and Saints/Грозы и Святые уже ждут вас на сайте! 🌩️ «— То, что ты сделала — ничто в сравнении с моим позорным прошлым. — Но я причинила тебе боль. — И я причинял тебе боль. — Я простила тебя, — серьёзно произнесла она. — Ты изменился, и я это знаю. Ты доказывал мне это раз за разом, а я лишь принесла тебе жалкое подобие извинений. — Грейнджер, я хочу, чтобы ты внимательно…
❤🔥17❤6
Signed avanesco
🦋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋 🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🦋 Мистический, нежный, обжигающий, таинственный, сказочный — вот лишь несколько определений, которые мы можем дать нашему анонсу. 🦋 Открываем сбор заявок на печать Сборника автора EtherealGlow, с иллюстрациями и обложкой от ShuangArt. ➡️В книгу войдут следующие работы: ➖ «Вечный шторм» ➖ «Обещай не исчезать с последним снегом» ➖ «Дух рождества» ➖ «Ты, я, огневиски» ➖ «Магия шёлка» ➖ «R.U.N…
😍5
Signed Марита
вот и проверили так, что теперь не помним смысл своих пометок
😁14❤4
Signed avanesco
вчера мы с Любой сидели в дискорде и проверяли грозы. так вышло, что речь зашла о драрри. минуты на три от силы. тамблер:
😁20❤6
Signed avanesco
операция «ноттпотт» активна всегда
❤14custom 53303370274790517146💋4💯2
Signed avanesco
как я представляю диалог мариты с настей, когда настя находит что-то новое с ноттпоттом 🤣
😁16❤5custom 53303370274790517145
Signed avanesco
и последнее на сегодня: если бы то, что вы читаете, было бы на ао3, вы бы читали там? (по сути, только в интерфейсе надо разобраться. и вечной рекламы не будет)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed avanesco
утолите интерес. тыкните, где читаете фанфики большую часть времени 🫶🏻
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed avanesco
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ 🥺3 глава фанфика «Falling Dark/Падая во тьму» уже на сайте! Фотография под сгибом была маленькой и сопровождалась крупным заголовком: СЕМЬЯ МАЛФОЙ ЗАМЕЧЕНА В МИНИСТЕРСТВЕ Ожидается объявление о роли в прошедшей войне. Грейнджер молча смотрела на зацикленное фото: на спины Люциуса и Нарциссы, заходящих в лифт в главном атриуме Министерства магии, и на стоящего за ними Драко, черная мантия дела…
❤12😍3🍓2custom 53303370274790517141
Signed avanesco
Драко: *флиртует с Грейнджер* Грейнджер: *отвечает на флирт* Драко: Грейнджер: ? Драко: Грейнджер: и ты ничего не скажешь? Драко: я не предполагал, что до такого дойдет #au #quotes source // рандомный тамблерный пост special for you
😁43❤13
Signed avanesco
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nashe_blyadstvo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
и последнее на сегодня: если бы то, что вы читаете, было бы на ао3, вы бы читали там? (по сути, только в интерфейсе надо разобраться. и вечной рекламы не будет)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
утолите интерес. тыкните, где читаете фанфики большую часть времени 🫶🏻
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2024 to 3 October 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 518,884 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nashe_blyadstvo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“avanesco & amortess” (@nashe_blyadstvo), 476 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nashe_blyadstvo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.