Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Афедрон

Channel

Афедрон

@narliesteam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

145subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001097082763
TypeChannel
Username@narliesteam
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/narliesteam

Growth

144145144.56 August 2026 — 144 subscribers8 August 2026 — 144 subscribers13 August 2026 — 145 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144–145 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:37145+1
8 Aug 2026, 21:17144no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:59144first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 11 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2934.9%
🔥1922.9%
👍1619.3%
🤮67.23%
👏33.61%
💩33.61%
🏆22.41%
💋22.41%
💯22.41%
11.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2025 to 8 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 7 we hold a reading for · 57%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @narliesteam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 November 2025 to 8 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 May 2026, 08:55 UTC126 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мам, смотри, я эксперт. И у меня есть пиджак)

11🏆1👍1👏1💋1🔥1

8 May 2026, 08:55 UTC129 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @depot_brandingPhoto

👣 Цифрово наследим вам тут сейчас Бренд для алгоритма — форматирование правды, а бренд для человека — настоящая причина выбора — с этой мысли началось выступление Дмитрия Еремеева на Российском Интернет‑Форуме в сессии АБКР о брендинге технологий. Дима показал, почему в эпоху ИИ нельзя полагаться только на большие данные и почему живые исследования остаются незаменимыми. 🖱 Что творится в диджитале, показываем в к

3👍2🔥2👏1💋1💯1🤮1

10 Mar 2026, 22:23 UTC206 views17 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Цифровой дизайн, который не пережил время Раньше я вполне всерьёз верил в «цифровой дизайн как конкурентное преимущество» в продуктах. Типа: сделаем визуально смелее, необычнее, «вау-интерфейс», и пользователь выберет нас, даже если по сути продукт плюс-минус такой же. И это реально работало: на несытом рынке красивый UI мог добавлять ценность, оправдывать цену, быть обсуждаемым и выигрывать внимание. Люди были скло

6💩3🤮3🔥2👍1👏1💯1

7 Feb 2026, 15:49 UTC160 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Конкуренция формируется в головах людей, а не на диджитал площадке. Конкурируют решения проблем людей, а не фичи и диджитал продукты. «Да, отличный продукт работает как надо. Но отличный бренд всегда будет отличным продуктом и работать как надо, неизбежно сталкиваясь с проблемами в продукте»

1🏆1👍1🔥1

7 Feb 2026, 15:49 UTC214 views11 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @depot_brandingPhoto

😨 Digital branding НЕ существует! 31 января в ВШБ прошла открытая лекция о digital-брендинге, где выступил Дмитрий Еремеев, диджитал директор Depot. Он поделился своим опытом и взглядами на то, как строить и развивать сильный бренд в цифровой среде. Дима подсветил следюущие аспекты: ✅ В целом, Digital branding не существует — это тот же самый брендинг, и абсолютно неважно, в какой среде он обитает ✅ Важно понимат

3👍3🔥3🤮2

15 Nov 2025, 10:23 UTC320 views13 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас нахожусь на Dprofile Fest & Awards. Пара наблюдений: — Вот уже третье мероприятие разных дизайн комьюнити показывает похожие цифры при опросе: 40-45% фрилансеры, 20-25% свои студии и мелкие артели, остальные от бизнеса и агентств. Это про мотивацию и деньги на билеты — На глаз, добрая пятая часть молодых дизайнеров, тех, кто не в мерче своем, предпочли прийти в черном пиджаке. Да, оверсайзы, модные, на футбу

🔥6👍43

11 Nov 2025, 19:37 UTC298 views20 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @netology_degreePhoto

Новая экскурсия в копилку! Отложили учебную рутину, вышли за пределы экранов ноутбуков и отправились с комьюнити студентов на очную экскурсию в офис агентства Depot. На встрече посмотрели на работу компании, а ещё стали участниками воркшопа от digital-директора Дмитрия Еремеева, на котором узнали, как брендинг живёт в цифровом продукте. 👍 Дмитрий дал простой фреймворк, который позволит командам смотреть за рамками

12👍4🔥4

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @narliesteam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Афедрон” (@narliesteam), 145 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/narliesteam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.