Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

남동이가 간다

@namdongX

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,085subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002786509957
TypeChannel
Username@namdongX
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/namdongX

Growth

1,0851,0901,087.57 August 2026 — 1,090 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,090 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,089 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,085 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,084–1,091 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 20:431,085-4
8 Aug 2026, 16:361,089-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:051,090no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:301,090first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7661.3%
😭1310.5%
😁129.68%
👍97.26%
🖕75.65%
🥰54.03%
💩21.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 30 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @namdongX. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 January 2026 to 30 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Apr 2026, 08:14 UTC≈3,090 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

미장 진짜 신임? 어제밤에 입금해서 최고점에 긁어도 다먹여주네 이래서 다 코인으로 안돌아오는거구나..

👍93

16 Apr 2026, 03:31 UTC≈1,060 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Tmi) 이거 배너이미지 내가 만들었음

8

16 Apr 2026, 03:31 UTC920 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @edge_alertPhoto

⬆️ EDGE $1.20 @edge_alert

5

17 Mar 2026, 22:19 UTC≈2,380 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

이제부터 진짜 엣지엑스

9🖕6💩2

17 Mar 2026, 21:44 UTC≈6,770 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🪡 edgeX 코베 로드맵 발표 https://x.com/coinbasemarkets/status/2034020550930997322

12

17 Mar 2026, 21:40 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @NewListingsFeed

$EDGEX added to Coinbase roadmap

10 Feb 2026, 15:36 UTC≈4,320 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

x지x스 포당 10불가는 세계선

😭13

2 Feb 2026, 20:58 UTC≈1,730 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

이와 같은 생각을 계속 하고있음 그동안 몇번 말했지만 지금같은 시장에서 저점을 잡아보려고 노력하는 손익비보다 그냥 현생을 보살피면서 가족 친구 애인과의 시간에 집중하는게 인생에나 리스크관리에나 더 낫겠다는 생각임 중국애들은 춘절도 있고하니 나도 시기 맞춰서 3월 첫째주까지 약속이랑 여행으로 일정을 꽉 채워놨는데 그때 쯤엔 어느정도 시장이 정리돼있음 좋겠네 코인과는 최대한 거리를 두는중 갔다오고나서 올해 상반기 안으로는 모든걸 수확하고나서 완전히 인생에서 지워버리고 현생으로 돌아갈듯

11

2 Feb 2026, 20:49 UTC≈1,170 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @xiticlePhoto

고무공과 유리공: 인생이라는 저글링 오늘 처음 알게 된 비유인데, 정말 유용한 관점이라고 생각합니다. 원작자는 코카콜라의 CEO였던 것으로 알고 있습니다. 인생을 다섯 개의 공을 공중에 띄워 유지해야 하는 저글링 게임이라고 상상해 보십시오. 이 공들은 우리 삶의 핵심 요소인 일, 가족, 건강, 친구, 그리고 영혼을 상징합니다. 여기서 핵심적인 통찰은 이것입니다. '일'은 고무공이라는 사실입니다. 만약 바닥에 떨어뜨려도 다시 튀어 오릅니다. 회복이 가능하다는 뜻이죠. 다른 직장을 구할 수도 있고, 사업을 다시 일으키거나 프로젝트를 새로 시작할 수도 있습니다. 하지만 나머지 네 개의 공인 가족, 건강, 친구, 영혼은 유리로 만들어져 있습니다. 만약 이 중 하나라도 떨어뜨린다면, 돌이킬 수 없을 정도로 긁히거나 금이 가고, 심지어는 산산조각

3

2 Feb 2026, 04:02 UTC≈1,520 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

비트 97k -> 75k 하리 21불 -> 32불 펖덱대장님 비트 곱버스 돼가는중ㄷㄷ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @namdongX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,199,311 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“남동이가 간다” (@namdongX), 1,085 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/namdongX.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.