Channel
@najafielnaz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
557subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001447642881 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @najafielnaz |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/najafielnaz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 557 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:20 | 550 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 548 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 December 2025 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 996 |
| Reactions total | 84 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
366 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 316 | 86.3% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 3.55% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 2.73% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 2.19% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 1.64% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 1.09% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.82% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.546% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.546% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.273% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.273% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 366reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌍همهٔ ما شیرینترین شادیها را در جایی یافتهایم که هیچچیز نویدش را نمیداد... (سنتاگزوپری، زمین انسانها) جواهری دورافتاده، ملاده، شهمیرزاد، مرداد۱۴۰۵ @najafielnaz
❤25🔥2
Signed Elnaz Najafi
سال ۱۳۰۲ روزنامهی شفق سرخ فراخوانی همگانی برای پاسخ به پنج پرسش زیر دربارهی آینده را داد: ایدهآل ما چیست؟ چه میخواهیم؟ چه باید بخواهیم؟ به چه طریق و از چه راه و از کی باید بخواهیم؟ چهل نفر به این پرسشها پاسخ دادند که از آن میان مقالهی نوزده نفر از جمله ملکالشعرای بهار و عبدالله بهرامی در روزنامه منتشر شد. میتوان حدس زد که در سال ۱۳۰۲ چنین فراخوانی با بزنگاه تغییر سلطنت از قاجار به پهلوی مربوط بود اما در اصل م…
❤15👏2
Signed Elnaz Najafi
«فکر کردن به آیندۀ دور چه معنایی دارد وقتی یک ملت چشماندازی بلندتر از یک هفته ندارد؟» الناز نجفی دراین پرسش پیشفرضی مستتر است و آن اینکه فکر کردن به آیندۀ نزدیک لازمۀ اندیشیدن به آیندۀ دور است، و استعارهای در این پیشفرض محلول است و آن اینکه آینده را میشود با اندیشیدن «ساخت»؛ و طبیعتا ساختن از آنچیزیکه نزدیکتر است شروع میشود تا به آنچه دورتر است برسد. در این پیشفرض مخصوصا اعتباری بیش از حد به عاملیتِ افراد جام…
❤12👏3🔥2
Signed Elnaz Najafi
رویداد دیدار با نویسنده در ماه اخیر کتاب «نمکنامه» اثر دکتر الناز نجفی در گروه سپیدار باشگاه ازتا جمعخوانی شد و حالا در این رویداد میزبان نویسنده هستیم برای گفتگو دربارهی تجربههای سپیدار از مطالعهی این کتاب و همچنین شنیدن از این نویسنده دربارهی فرهنگ ایران. کتاب نمکنامه با تمرکز بر فرهنگ و هنر ایران در سویههای مختلف از قبیل شعر، معماری، غذا، عطر و بو، نقاشی، خطاطی، کاشیکاری، و خاطرات تاریخی به نکات ظری…
❤17❤🔥5👍1
Signed Elnaz Najafi
پرسش از ایران بر اساس کتاب ایران کجاست ایرانی کیست دوشنبه، ۲۵ خرداد ساعت ۱۷ @najafielnaz
❤11
Signed Elnaz Najafi
نگذشتنیترین اشاره به گذراییِ همه چیز! تبدیل گذراییِ زمان به چیزی ناگذرنده، چیزی ماندنی، چیزی ستودنی... @najafielnaz تصویر: قطعهای به خط میرزا غلامرضا اصفهانی
❤25
Signed Elnaz Najafi
کتاب ایران کجاست، ایرانی کیست؛ در گفتگوی مهری بهفر با نویسندگان @najafielnaz زمان: دوشنبه ۱۸ خرداد، ساعت ۱۸ مکان: شهر کتاب نیاوران
👍8❤6
Signed Elnaz Najafi
📝 درستی از شکست آینههای عمارت چهلستون اصفهان در حین ساختهشدن نیز به ریزترین قطعات خرد شده بود؛ این شکستگیایست پیش از هر انفجار احتمالی یا خرابیای مقدمۀ آبادانی؟¹ تَرَکهای ایوان مسجد کبود تبریز از درزِ کاشیهای لاجوردیاش قابل تشخیص نیست. سطحِ کاشیپوشِ معرّق به کاسۀ چینیای بندزده میماند: پیشواز کاشیکار از زمینلرزهای محتمل! هنرهای ایران شرح شکستهبسته ساختن است.² مُعرّقِ چوب و خاتم تردستی در خرد کردن و سر…
❤22💯2
Signed Elnaz Najafi
📝 «درستی از شکست» @najafielnaz
❤9
Signed Elnaz Najafi
💧 به باوری کهن هدهد پرندهای است که در پروازش بر فراز بیابانها قادر است وجود آب را در اعماق زمین (زیر هفت طبقه زمین) تشخیص دهد و حتى ژرفا، کیفیت و میزان آن را دریابد و منشأ آن که گسل است یا چشمهای مدفون ببیند. این همان معرفتی است که زیستن در فلات ایران را ممکن کرده بود. دشواری اصلی حفر قنات، نه شاید کندن ده ها چاه به عمق چند ده متر و نه حتی کندن کورهای زیر زمینی به طول چند کیلومتر که رسیدن به همین یقین است؛ اطمینا…
❤32
Signed Elnaz Najafi
مهمان میخورد و با لذت میگوید بسیار عالی بود. شما در جواب چه میگویید؟ میگویید: «نوش جان». نوش یعنی چه؟ یعنی جاودانه. (انوشیروان یعنی روانِ جاودانه). نوش جان یعنی: «باعث جاودانگیت بشود.» ببینید، ما یک غذا پختهایم، ولی از این غذا انتظار داریم که باعث جاودانگی طرف مقابل بشود. یعنی انگار ما مثل خدا بشویم، آفریننده بشویم، عمرش را دراز کنیم و باعث شویم او جاودانه بشود. در روایت هم دقیقاً همین اتفاق میافتد. قهرمان وار…
❤18🔥2
Signed Elnaz Najafi
متن کامل سخنرانی خانم دکتر الناز نجفی: سلام عرض میکنم خدمت همه حضار این جلسه. من هم مثل آقای بهشتی خیلی حیرتزدهام از اینکه ما آنقدر تابآوریم که میتوانیم بعد از این روزهایی که از سر گذراندیم، دور هم جمع بشویم و راجع به غذاهای آیینی صحبت کنیم؛ هرچند که فکر میکنم شاید یکی از مرتبطترین موضوعها به اوضاع و احوال فعلی ماست. من میخواهم صحبتهایم را با یک سؤال شروع کنم. اگر من از شما بپرسم که «دیروز ناهار چه خوردید؟…
❤9👏4
Signed Elnaz Najafi
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @najafielnaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 912,430 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حظّیات” (@najafielnaz), 557 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/najafielnaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.